PDA

View Full Version : D-Link DIR-655 - QoS vs WISH

MrJacky
14-05-2009, 05:39 PM
The D-Link DIR-655 provides both QoS and WISH, but what's really the difference between the two?

From what I see WISH seems to be QoS for wireless clients, so does that mean the QoS engine in the DIR-655 doesn't work for wireless clients?
liangtam
14-05-2009, 06:53 PM
The D-Link DIR-655 provides both QoS and WISH, but what's really the difference between the two?

From what I see WISH seems to be QoS for wireless clients, so does that mean the QoS engine in the DIR-655 doesn't work for wireless clients?

You haven read the manual yet?
What it covers is stated actually, or u still prefer me to tell u the answer?
MrJacky
14-05-2009, 09:10 PM
I haven't purchase the product, I'm trying out the DIR-655 control panel emulator.

Some QoS searches on Google led me to WISH, but none of those results tell me the real difference between both.
richneo
15-05-2009, 09:08 AM
I also curious to know. Let me go to school library download the manual from internet to see. Using hp to post this.
liangtam
15-05-2009, 09:17 AM
ftp://ftp.dlink.com/Gateway/dir655/Manual/dir655_manual_140.zip
pg 43
MrJacky
15-05-2009, 01:20 PM
ftp://ftp.dlink.com/Gateway/dir655/Manual/dir655_manual_140.zip
pg 43
That's exactly what I read in the DIR-655 control panel emulator here (http://support.dlink.com/Emulators/dir655/Internet.html).

Perhaps you may be able to explain it better. :)
liangtam
15-05-2009, 06:57 PM
That's exactly what I read in the DIR-655 control panel emulator here (http://support.dlink.com/Emulators/dir655/Internet.html).

Perhaps you may be able to explain it better. :)

Ahh, you haven't been reading...
Well, that is...
ish....ish.... :s34:

err, somehow ish dunch feel safe telling chiu reh, dunch scroll down hokays? :crazy:

























































































Actually, moi ish oso dunch noes reh, LOL :o
just jking =:p

Std QoS for WAN traffic
WISH/WMM for WLAN traffic

What does WMM/WISH mainly covers? Video, audio/voice.
http://kb.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/221

Example: There are currently two application running for the WAN(Internet) side, VoIP and P2P; and ms file transfer taking place on wlan side. Assuming the VoIP in question is a WiFi SIP/Skype phone, and one of the either prioritizer is disabled. What will happen?

Closing thoughts: You really haven been reading!!(no matter how u claim otherwise) :s22:
MrJacky
16-05-2009, 10:33 PM
Ahh, you haven't been reading...
Well, that is...
ish....ish.... :s34:

err, somehow ish dunch feel safe telling chiu reh, dunch scroll down hokays? :crazy:

























































































Actually, moi ish oso dunch noes reh, LOL :o
just jking =:p

Std QoS for WAN traffic
WISH/WMM for WLAN traffic

What does WMM/WISH mainly covers? Video, audio/voice.
http://kb.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/221

Example: There are currently two application running for the WAN(Internet) side, VoIP and P2P; and ms file transfer taking place on wlan side. Assuming the VoIP in question is a WiFi SIP/Skype phone, and one of the either prioritizer is disabled. What will happen?

Closing thoughts: You really haven been reading!!(no matter how u claim otherwise) :s22:
I did read the help section in the control panel (emulator) and the manual you provided.

Both are exactly the same (at least for the page you specified).

My understanding after reading the help section is that WISH controls the traffic for WiFi, but where does that leave QoS? Would that mean that QoS cannot control the traffic that goes to wireless clients?

However, I will check out the latest link you provided.
liangtam
16-05-2009, 11:52 PM
its clearly stated in my example.
to be frank, i never rly wanted to reply u actually.
MrJacky
18-05-2009, 02:34 PM
its clearly stated in my example.
to be frank, i never rly wanted to reply u actually.
So, from the link you specified, WISH is only applicable to audio, video and voice applications?

Then what's stopping me from using QoS to control those instead? If I could use QoS for that wouldn't that make WISH useless?
liangtam
18-05-2009, 02:36 PM
So, from the link you specified, WISH is only applicable to audio, video and voice applications?

Then what's stopping me from using QoS to control those instead? If I could use QoS for that wouldn't that make WISH useless?

Haiz...

*10 char*
MrJacky
19-05-2009, 08:30 PM
Haiz...

*10 char*
"Haiz" won't answer any question.
liangtam
20-05-2009, 09:23 AM
"Haiz" won't answer any question.

Cos its already shown

Or u prefer me write it in abc style for u? The logical effect of having QoS and not having it.
MrJacky
20-05-2009, 03:07 PM
Cos its already shown

Or u prefer me write it in abc style for u? The logical effect of having QoS and not having it.
Yes, since I have sent my brain for warranty servicing.
liangtam
20-05-2009, 06:32 PM
Yes, since I have sent my brain for warranty servicing.

Ahh, no wonder, you wasted my time... :s22:

Example 2: A road of cars and buses is about to enter from a 4 lane to 2 lane road. Assuming the destination is Y somewhere around the end of the 2-lane road.

If you want a specific group of vehicles such as buses to travel at faster speeds(especially when they drive slowly due to timebelt restriction). What do you do?
Implement a special bus lane lor.

If you apply it on a 4-lane road, bus travel will be smooth, until the entrance to 2-lane road. Hence reaching Y will have to depend on the real road condition of the 2-lane.
If you apply it on the 2-lane road only, then the bus will be delayed by the earlier vehicles. It speds up after entering 2-lane road. Ultimately, its still slowed.

Can u not have both roads having bus lane if your intention is for a specific vehicles to move faster instead of hogging a road?