Workers’ Party’s response to the appointment of independent accountants raises eyebrows

gwzc_mk2

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
22,209
Reaction score
56
This has nothing to do with kicking them when they are down. This issue have been ongoing because they useless incompetent WP have been screwing up since taking over AHTC back in 2011. This is a pre-GE2015 issue. One that needs to be resolved
so had the losses in lehman brothers been recovered?
or just swept under the carpet?
this is pre GE2011 issue till now still no one took responsibility
 

CAShop

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,412
Reaction score
0
so had the losses in lehman brothers been recovered?
or just swept under the carpet?
this is pre GE2011 issue till now still no one took responsibility

Issue was discuss in PARLIAMENT. How can something that was discussed in Parliament be called sweep under carpet. Just because U only read opposition propaganda does not mean the issue was not addressed
 

CAShop

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2012
Messages
8,412
Reaction score
0
Still got that AIM? :D

There was no issue with AIM in the first place

1)Recommendation to sell and leaseback the software was done by neutral 3rd party auditor
2)Went through proper tender process, AIM was the only one who bid and that was AFTER the deadline happened when no one bid
3)No issue with low pay up capital as the money to purchase the software was paid up front
4)Bulk of the profit from maintenance went to NCS, AIM made only around $10-20K from the entire deal

http://www.voiddecker.com/2013/01/a-different-look-at-this-aimishambles

U should ask WP what happened to FMSS instead
1)No proper tender
2)Company owned by their good friends
3)Charged the highest per household rate
4)Screw up accounts from 2011-2015
5)Subcontract to own company. Ownself give ownself business
6)Payment approval goes through the boss who owns both companies, ownself check ownself
 

Kinetic88

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2007
Messages
65,180
Reaction score
5
Issue was discuss in PARLIAMENT. How can something that was discussed in Parliament be called sweep under carpet. Just because U only read opposition propaganda does not mean the issue was not addressed

"discussed" in parliament means the money had been pay back or just write off and no one ish responsible for the loses ?

public monee just vanished like that ?
 

whatmeworry

Greater Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2015
Messages
82,242
Reaction score
7,777
Transparency is good for sinkies!
To learn the truth of these lousy opposition tactics!

Heng ah. I voted with the 70% team!
 

figo16

Banned
Joined
Dec 6, 2010
Messages
26,919
Reaction score
5,466
WP need to hire more people with accounting and finance background as MP candidates and not lawyers and professors who only NATO. I realise that wp professor candidiate only know how to talk but no action one. Who doesn't know how to criticise?
 

sadsad123

Banned
Joined
Aug 8, 2006
Messages
12,488
Reaction score
189
Machiam the other party is very transparent lydat...please lar...you think we stupid is it?
 

shinkuaku

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2010
Messages
18,714
Reaction score
24
Show bank account then talk lar **

Sent from Sony C6603 using GAGT

Open the books for all tcs... Don't need such childish pickering.

We as citizens will then judge who can handle their funds better. We know oppo's wards had their funds withheld but were expected to run their towns as per normal, while some other tcs had almost unlimited funds...

The oppos did a better job imo, if they say it is otherwise, please open the books of all tcs. Let the public be the judge.

And the case of the deficit becoming surplus after they won? How is the case now? Closed? So is it deficit or surplus?
 
Last edited:

cran87

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
17,122
Reaction score
289
i wonder why WP would spend tons of money on lawyers to go to high court, and not on the big 4 auditors?

surely lawyers fee are higher?
 

gwzc_mk2

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2004
Messages
22,209
Reaction score
56
Issue was discuss in PARLIAMENT. How can something that was discussed in Parliament be called sweep under carpet. Just because U only read opposition propaganda does not mean the issue was not addressed
so who took responsibility?
any punishment handed out?
who approved the investment in the first place?

btw. typing in caps does not mean u are right
 

penholder

Master Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Messages
4,152
Reaction score
0
There was no issue with AIM in the first place

1)Recommendation to sell and leaseback the software was done by neutral 3rd party auditor
2)Went through proper tender process, AIM was the only one who bid and that was AFTER the deadline happened when no one bid
3)No issue with low pay up capital as the money to purchase the software was paid up front
4)Bulk of the profit from maintenance went to NCS, AIM made only around $10-20K from the entire deal

http://www.voiddecker.com/2013/01/a-different-look-at-this-aimishambles

U should ask WP what happened to FMSS instead
1)No proper tender
2)Company owned by their good friends
3)Charged the highest per household rate
4)Screw up accounts from 2011-2015
5)Subcontract to own company. Ownself give ownself business
6)Payment approval goes through the boss who owns both companies, ownself check ownself

Lol who owns AIM? Ownself can do, other people cannot do?
 

skytan13

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
30,788
Reaction score
202
at least put source mah TS.

One cut and paste screenie

boh date boh anything...

so is old shyt or new stuff?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top