You are fucking kidding me. Even up to this point, you still want to argue and defend your position, without even using any point of reference as well, instead of taking a step back and start reconsidering your position. I know you are already into pharmacy school, but it isn't too late to change course or plan for an alternative route the moment you graduate. But instead you want to come here and defend your stance to assuage your cognitive dissonance?
You have no idea how employment rate is calculated. Pharmacy employment rate used to be 100% only just a while back. Does this means no one go study, no one go start business, etc? No, these people are considered 100% gainfully employed, so doctors who do these things do not affect their employment rate at all. The low employment of pharmacist only shows that these fresh grads are unable to find a gig after graduation and also are unable to find an alternate path be it go study, go start business etc.
I don't know why you are comparing a doctor and lawyer's work hours vs a pharmacist. The whole point here is that as a lawyer and doctor, you will be well compensated for the hard work you put in. As a pharmacist, you work real hard for peanuts.
You posts are not at all consistent with anyone who have any experience. Only your cognitive dissonance can see this as consistency when just about every message posted goes against you. You see why I have to be totally crude with my online postings? If I simply posted harsh messages here, your lame brain will simply twist it as if I am agreeing with you. I have to attack your character for you to get the shock you need to wake the fuck up.
This also goes to show your weak mindset and your inability to adapt and make adjustments with changing information. Being such a strawberry, you will be pwned easily by foreigners.
The only point that they brought up would be employment rate.(which I did agree with them with regards to the increasing oversaturation of Pharmacists) They didn't comment on other points that I have brought up.
And you don't get compensated fairly for being a Pharmacists? You have a decent job, a relatively high starting pay. $3k+ to you may be peanuts for a starting pay but it may mean the world to someone else. Not everyone is as privileged as you.
Why do I bring in Lawyers? I ain't comparing their work hours, but the similarity of the situation that Pharmacists and Lawyers are both facing. They are straight A students as well, but they are having difficulty finding law firms to aid them in their training contract or employment. Their training contract isn't 100% anymore, employment isn't 100% for fresh grads, no guaranteed employment after training(Doesn't this case sound similar) Is that any fair for them? Only those who worked their ass off get compensated fairly.
Many Straight A students still apply for law because of their passion and interests. It is perfectly alright to do that and it would help prospective students by being supportive of their decision. As such, I used an encouraging tone in my previous post but neither did I force them to join pharmacy Nor did I feed them with incorrect, inconsistent information without any sources. This is if you let go off your judgemental biasness.
Last edited: