HWZ Forums
| Login | Register | FAQ | Mark Forums Read |
SIM UOL students lip lais! - Part 4
![]() |
Page 146 of 665
|
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#2176 |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
Any hero taking macro gonna skip economic growth like me? My maths too lousy to even decipher the solution, the most memorise the derivation if really no choice and get some marks. -.-
Last edited by Cerius; 19-04-2012 at 08:06 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
#2177 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 233
|
Any hero taking macro gonna skip economic growth like me? My maths too lousy to even decipher the solution, the most memorise the derivation if really no choice and some marks. -.- Haven't tried it but no point starting something new when most other topics aren't even covered well yet. |
|
|
|
|
#2178 |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
I'm skipping that chapter entirely. |
|
|
|
|
#2179 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 233
|
wow, high risk taker like me, lets just hope the other question won't be too hard that we are left with no choice. Like last year's paper really lol. Anyways: Universities roll out 'MRT delay plan' during exams - Channel NewsAsia |
|
|
|
|
#2180 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 95
|
Feel sorry for our seniors really, studied so hard using PYPs then when they flipped open the paper they find themselves facing that.. |
|
|
|
|
#2181 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 554
|
Feel sorry for our seniors really, studied so hard using PYPs then when they flipped open the paper they find themselves facing that.. |
|
|
|
|
#2182 |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
last year cf was a shocker? |
|
|
|
|
#2183 |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
Feel sorry for our seniors really, studied so hard using PYPs then when they flipped open the paper they find themselves facing that.. ![]() Right now the macro is.... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#2184 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,252
|
last year got NPV question, which I can say is already a savior for those taking CF to pass. but for those seeking 2nd upper and above, really bad luck. ![]() so how about the capital allowance thingy? shld we follow the commentary? |
|
|
|
|
#2185 |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
ish jin sian |
|
|
|
|
#2186 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,252
|
i don care already, I will just state straight line depreciation = xxx amount every year until blabla, i am very sure they won't mark u down for it, they are testing us on the capital allowance and tax concept, not depreciation anyway. If everything is shown i am sure full marks is still awarded. |
|
|
|
|
#2187 |
|
Master Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2,606
|
straight line depreciation for that question is easier than the commentary's reducing balance method.
Initial cost - residual value (25000 disposal value) / no. of years. 250000 - 25000 / 4 = 56250 each year. As depreciation is always at the end of year, capital allowance is stated to compute the beginning of year value. So for year 1 beginning of year before depreciation is the initial value. 0.25 x 250000 = 62500 Year 2's asset value is (250000 - 56250 depn) x 0.25 capital allowance = 48437.5 Year 3's asset value is (250000 - 56250 - 56250) x 0.25 capital allowance = 34375 Whereas what they are doing is reducing balance, 4 years = 25% depreciation each year. Year 1 is the same as above. Year 2 [250000 - (0.25 * 250000)] * 0.25 capital allowance = 46875 Value of asset here at bgn is in bold = 187500 Year 3 = [187500 - (0.25 * 187500) ] * 0.25 capital allowance = 35156.25 figures quite close but still =.= no idea why they keep doing reducing balance when asked for straight line for 2011 and 2010 paper! Last edited by Cerius; 19-04-2012 at 11:10 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
#2188 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 233
|
yeah the way they increase the benchmark is ridiculous, just a few years ago like 2009 and 2008 paper, there are such easy questions on ISLM like substituting figures into Y = C + I + G and straight forward adjustments such as telling you an increase in taxes directly I think now the biggest concern for macro is whether will still have the closed economy qn telling us to find equilibrium price and output. If like prelim liddat dun have then alot of us will have a very hard time liao.. straight line depreciation for that question is easier than the commentary's reducing balance method. NBV(t0) = CA(t1) + NBV(t1) So just follow zigzag pattern in working can get answer. |
|
|
|
|
#2189 |
|
Arch-Supremacy Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 18,491
|
Who is taking IM?
What to study? 1st time taking
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#2190 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 72
|
hi guys,i want to ask if i can take a risk by skipping ratios, cash budget and variances for POA? focus only on p&l, cashflow, npv, balance sheet, thats all
|
|
|
![]() |
Page 146 of 665
|
Important Forum Advisory Note
|
| This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.
Please refer to our Terms of Service for more information. |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|

























