Reigns survived the first brogue kick, buy ate another and won the title. With so many guys out, I feel that they needed to just make a guy Instead of doing that, they Lex Lugered Reigns again and gave the belt to the mid-card loser that was making, “get jiggy with it” jokes earlier in the night. Also add in the fact that he had been repeatedly pushed (and hell I LIKE Sheamus) and not gotten over all that well and this feels badly laid out and executed. The Reigns win felt right, the spear on Triple H was right and if they had to run a cash in angle, they should have just had Reigns win and done the clean sweep to try and give him a go. I mean is anyone excited for Sheamus as “the guy” at this point? The worst part is that the feed continued, an showed Roman basically crying as people mocked and booed him.
WWE Creative team is really jin creative
I think now the fans are too much.
They want the matches to end in the result they expect.
You don't have this kind of fans in the 80s and 90s.
How fun will it be if every results goes your way?
I think the point is not the result going the fan's way, is more of a complaint to the current state of the product. This tournament is a huge opportunity for WWE to either build a new star in either Ambrose or Reigns but in the end they choose the most predictable and boring route in giving Sheamus the belt, the guy that couldn't get over with the fans even after multiple pushes.
Also, this is the third time Triple H has been involved in a successful Money in the Bank cash in, 2011 with Del Rio and Punk, 2013 with Orton and Bryan and this. This type of repetitive booking only shows us that WWE is running out of ideas and don't really know what to do with the product without Mr Hustle, Loyalty and Respect.
Money in the bank gotta be successfully cashed in. If not, it will make it lose its status as money in the bank thing.
I think only once or twice they did not cash in successfully and no doubt, it makes money in the bank loses its shine