HWZ Forums

Login Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

J3 users come here!

Like Tree2Likes
Share This Page
HardwareZone.com on Facebook
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 15-03-2012, 10:38 PM   #766
Great Supremacy Member
 
x3dnd3x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 50,707
Thanks x3dnd3x, I did some reading b4 this reply and bought a Zip. Did tried a Clip+ and Zip (from someone I happens to know and owns them) on a flat EQ and thought they sound very similar. I kind of like what I heard and it doesn't cost that much to own and know that it will eventually be passed on to my wife/daughter once I find my ideal player. Right now, the J3 is still in my shortlist will take my time to research on some other players before committing. In your opinion, what is the next step up to the J3? Thanks.
Frankly speaking , i never spend more than $300 on a DAP . If it passes that amount , i rather use the money to get other audio stuffs . I'm more of a headphone person than IEM . Took me awhile before jumping to IE8 with custom sleeve . Before that was using Atrios .

It depends on how you view it . I rather spend more and listen comfortably at home . Imo , J3 up onwards i would say something which is in the top tier league like DX100 and etc . I never tried DX100 before thou .
x3dnd3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2012, 11:04 PM   #767
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 339
Any tips on eq-ing on the J3? Have been using the J3 for quite a few months now and I've been using the preset EQs that came with the player ie. BBE Headphone and BBE Mach3Bass. I'm quite satisfied with the sound but is there any way to make it better? Any experts would like to shed light on this?
tomtan07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2012, 11:17 PM   #768
Great Supremacy Member
 
x3dnd3x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 50,707
Any tips on eq-ing on the J3? Have been using the J3 for quite a few months now and I've been using the preset EQs that came with the player ie. BBE Headphone and BBE Mach3Bass. I'm quite satisfied with the sound but is there any way to make it better? Any experts would like to shed light on this?
Go to Iaudiophile forum and look under Jet Effect 3.0 .

Use proxy .
x3dnd3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2012, 11:20 PM   #769
Member
 
Leo888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 162
Frankly speaking , i never spend more than $300 on a DAP . If it passes that amount , i rather use the money to get other audio stuffs . I'm more of a headphone person than IEM . Took me awhile before jumping to IE8 with custom sleeve . Before that was using Atrios .

It depends on how you view it . I rather spend more and listen comfortably at home . Imo , J3 up onwards i would say something which is in the top tier league like DX100 and etc . I never tried DX100 before thou .
I'm with you regarding being a headphone person and I do own the HD650 and M50. I have a young family with 2 kids and is quite impossible to listen comfortably with all the distractions around. Anyway, you have a point there regarding spending too much on a DAP and have read in other forums that most good quality DAP sounds quite similar on a flat EQ. Now you have trigger my urge to part money for the J3/Z2. About DX100, did thought about it but for the price, I'm not so sure about that.
Leo888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2012, 11:30 PM   #770
Great Supremacy Member
 
x3dnd3x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 50,707
I'm with you regarding being a headphone person and I do own the HD650 and M50. I have a young family with 2 kids and is quite impossible to listen comfortably with all the distractions around. Anyway, you have a point there regarding spending too much on a DAP and have read in other forums that most good quality DAP sounds quite similar on a flat EQ. Now you have trigger my urge to part money for the J3/Z2. About DX100, did thought about it but for the price, I'm not so sure about that.
Arh M50 . I'm either on DT990 or T1 . Currently considering to purchase a new headphone for studio monitoring . Considering M50 or MK240ii .
x3dnd3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-03-2012, 11:59 PM   #771
Supremacy Member
 
Mzeria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,144
Any tips on eq-ing on the J3? Have been using the J3 for quite a few months now and I've been using the preset EQs that came with the player ie. BBE Headphone and BBE Mach3Bass. I'm quite satisfied with the sound but is there any way to make it better? Any experts would like to shed light on this?
You have to know your IEM's weak and strong points to eq. As in which areas to boost in the Jet effect 3.0.
If you can do this properly, it will sound better than all of the preset eq's imo.
Mzeria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2012, 12:26 AM   #772
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 339
You have to know your IEM's weak and strong points to eq. As in which areas to boost in the Jet effect 3.0.
If you can do this properly, it will sound better than all of the preset eq's imo.
Hmm.. I'm currently using Shure SE215. Pretty modest setup haha.
tomtan07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2012, 01:00 AM   #773
Supremacy Member
 
Mzeria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,144
Shure SE215

I don't really understand the graph there, but it seems the bass on the 215 is lacking? Probably need to add a bit to it?

To start off, you could set the benchmark as "Normal" eq, and start to improve bit and bit from there. Usually the signature sound isn't too far off from Normal.
Mzeria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2012, 02:05 AM   #774
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 339
Shure SE215

I don't really understand the graph there, but it seems the bass on the 215 is lacking? Probably need to add a bit to it?

To start off, you could set the benchmark as "Normal" eq, and start to improve bit and bit from there. Usually the signature sound isn't too far off from Normal.
Haha the only thing I'm worried about is that the music will start to become unatural, not like how it was originally intended to be heard.
tomtan07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-03-2012, 03:06 AM   #775
Great Supremacy Member
 
x3dnd3x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 50,707
Haha the only thing I'm worried about is that the music will start to become unatural, not like how it was originally intended to be heard.
EQ-ing will definitely change the music alittle . You gain some , you lose some .
x3dnd3x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-03-2012, 12:07 PM   #776
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 55
If no amp , go for J3 .

If you plan to use dac/amp combo , use Iphone or your Ipod touch because got line out .
Thanks ah! Know what I want alr
tricraze is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2012, 01:18 PM   #777
Master Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 3,547
Some guys has no either how to mix and the end result is bad.

Haha the only thing I'm worried about is that the music will start to become unatural, not like how it was originally intended to be heard.
Abletron001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2012, 04:47 PM   #778
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 45
Shure SE215

I don't really understand the graph there, but it seems the bass on the 215 is lacking? Probably need to add a bit to it?

To start off, you could set the benchmark as "Normal" eq, and start to improve bit and bit from there. Usually the signature sound isn't too far off from Normal.
what i normally do is to fire up the equalizer to maximum values then i slowly lessen tremble and bass until i get the sound that i like, i takes some patience to customize your own sound though but its well worth your time once you got it. SE535 is quite good by the way.

Last edited by zaoltryence; 18-03-2012 at 04:50 PM..
zaoltryence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2012, 08:06 PM   #779
Supremacy Member
 
Mzeria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 6,144
what i normally do is to fire up the equalizer to maximum values then i slowly lessen tremble and bass until i get the sound that i like, i takes some patience to customize your own sound though but its well worth your time once you got it. SE535 is quite good by the way.
Hope you are actually increasing it to 12 on one band one at a time
Doing it on all 5 would be earsplitting
Besides that, there are also narrow/normal/wide and also the various frequencies to play with. I try never to go beyond 2 on any band.
Mzeria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-03-2012, 10:17 PM   #780
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 45
Hope you are actually increasing it to 12 on one band one at a time
Doing it on all 5 would be earsplitting
Besides that, there are also narrow/normal/wide and also the various frequencies to play with. I try never to go beyond 2 on any band.
frankly speaking i did but of course the volume level was at 16 i think is good that way because you could clearly notice every changes you did. So its much more easier for me to discern the sound output. Then i adjust frequencies and other stuff
zaoltryence is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Terms of Service for more information.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On