Singapore: A model judgement for the United States?
Just thought I did share an interesting article on Havard Biz Review for your discussions
Quote:
We often talk about judgment with regard to individuals, but organizations and countries can have good and bad judgment as well. I was recently in Singapore for a SAS customer event. Every time I visit, it has struck me as a country with good judgment. Singapore just celebrated its forth-fourth birthday as an independent country, and it deserves to congratulate itself (although it rarely engages in self-congratulation — another aspect of good judgment). In fact, I'd argue that in many ways Singapore is a great example for the United States. Why? Here are a few reasons:
1. Singapore is a hardworking, disciplined country. It decides what it needs to do, and then does it. Every year for National Day, for example, the government publishes a list of challenges it needs to overcome. This year's list included such bracing issues as "How to maintain high economic growth and improve living standard?" and "How to stamp out new diseases and keep health-care costs down?" There is also the lighter, but sociologically problematic challenge of "How to get younger Singaporeans to marry and have children?" The list of challenges is enormously appealing in its clarity and directness.
2. Singapore is obsessed with education — not just for children, but throughout life. Another of its declared challenges is, "How to design job-training programmes and wage supplement schemes for low-income older workers?" The country tops the ranks of educational achievement regularly. While it was once justifiably criticized for emphasizing rote learning, it has introduced programs that encourage creativity.
3. Singapore is a highly capitalist society, but its government plays a strong guiding role. Some of the country's smartest citizens go into government. The government creates industrial policy and actively facilitates growth and capability-building in those areas. It did a masterful job emphasizing IT and building up that industry, and now it's actively pushing biotech and services. For example, in services the government wanted to build on organizations with great service like Singapore Airlines and Raffles Hotel. So it encouraged Singapore Management University (a private university that was established by the government) to start an Institute for Service Excellence, and stimulated the development of a Singapore Customer Satisfaction Index that would be applied to all service industries.
4. Like the US, Singapore is a highly diverse society, with lots of citizens with Chinese, Malay, Indian, and Arab backgrounds. Yet they all seem to get along pretty well, and the country's culture is greatly enriched by the diversity. Public housing is ethnically and religiously integrated. Other countries could probably use a version of its "Maintenance of Religious Harmony Act," which prohibits religious rabble-rousing.
5. Singapore invests heavily in infrastructure — housing, roads, IT, airport (only one, but Changi is a very impressive facility). 83% of its citizens live in public housing, but it's clean and well-maintained. The country is rolling out a new high-bandwidth fiber optic network. Buses and subways are clean and run on time.
6. Singapore's economy is doing pretty well. It does anticipate a decline in GDP of about 5% this year, but there are signs of a strong recovery. Its stock market is booming. Its banks didn't go crazy with subprime lending or bizarre derivatives. One economist told me that the Asian financial crisis of 1997 was worse than the current recession for Singapore.
Okay, it's not a Utopian society. The government is a bit authoritarian for my tastes, but not as much as in the Lee Kuan Yew (its first prime minister from 1959 to 1990) days. The prohibitions against spitting and selling chewing gum are a little much — though I really like the clean streets. Yes, you may be caned if you misbehave, but it might be better than locking up the world's highest proportion of citizens in jails. I feel that Singapore destroyed much of its interesting architecture in the headlong rush to modernize. And it seems to me that too many of its citizens are obsessed with luxury brands and conspicuous consumption. These are relatively minor concerns, however, compared to the country's strengths. And many of the seemingly autocratic regulations might be justified by the ethnic diversity and high population density of the country.
Singapore is tiny compared to the United States (and most other countries, for that matter), but that doesn't mean it can't be a model. Barack Obama keeps saying that we need to buckle down and work hard to build an economy based on real production, not hollow financial chicanery. We need a little more social order, and a little less individualism. Singapore has already pulled off both objectives, and continues to provide a good example of good judgment for the United States and the rest of the world.
Singapore just celebrated its forth-fourth birthday as an independent country, and it deserves to congratulate itself (although it rarely engages in self-congratulation
Stopped reading there.
__________________
[i]"We are all at a table together, deciding which rules to adopt, free from any vague constraints, half-remembered myths, anonymous patriarchal texts and murky concepts of nature. If I propose something you do not like, tell me why it is not practical, or harms somebody, or is counter to some other useful rule; but don't tell me it offends the universe."[/i] -Jonathan Wallace
CORRECTION: ONE American thought Singapore is so good.
I think that our style of fascist government suits certain people better than others. The pro-big government types would like it, especially the special interest groups.
The fiercely independent like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates would hate it.
__________________
Persistence in one opinion has never been considered a merit in political leaders. - Marcus Cicero
Singapore just celebrated its forth-fourth birthday as an independent country, and it deserves to congratulate itself (although it rarely engages in self-congratulation)
Stopped reading there too.
Either he is blind, ill-informed, or he is paid to write this.
It doesn't come as a surprise to me. Many Americans laud our social control and some Australians I know would love to impose things like NS on their wayward youth too.
__________________
"Word games," I dismissed. "Every army needs a flag."
— Haruki Murakami
There and good and bad in all systems, the US can use some of our ways and we can use some of theirs... maybe the grass is always greener on teh other side.
There and good and bad in all systems, the US can use some of our ways and we can use some of theirs... maybe the grass is always greener on teh other side.
Yeap, I'd definitely agree with you on that.
__________________
"Word games," I dismissed. "Every army needs a flag."
— Haruki Murakami
"We need a little more social order, and a little less individualism. "
Yes breed more clones.
Agreed thats one really messed up statement.. its like saying "give me all your rights and freedom if not there will be social disorder" and i would say that its the opposite that is happening especially in the US now.. that in fact because of the big govt and their continuing meddling in everything that is causing social disorder.
And i disagree completely with point 3. Govt "encouragement" to go into certain sectors are never good.. things like that shd be left to the individuals to decide.. if an individual wants to start his own business naturally he would do research on which sector best to go into, no one would want to go into an unprofitable sector. Govt "encouragement" spoils this logic by 1:because they are somewhat endorsing it, ppl become negligent in doing their own research. 2: how can the govt do a better job at identifying which is best to go into compared to an individual whose very own wealth is at stake here and whos aware of their own unique situation. 3:Govt "encouragement" tends to oversupply that sector with capital and labour when those capital could very well be put somewhere more profitable. I certainly wldnt call the building up of our IT masterful, it was expected. With so much emphasis on that sector what did he expect other then a buildup? but whether our country has benefitted more(question that the author SHD BE discussing) from govt involvement vs non involvement still remains an open question and a very impt question which seems to nv surface.
Channels
TECH GUIDES
1 googol = 1.0 × 10^100 
