Honestly, if cannot tell the difference, I would get the ideal diamond instead (probably will save at least 1.5-2k vs a super ideal). Can use the savings to do a nice ring setting.
I have also been looking at other websites (pricescope etc, saw KinoChoco there! ), and if you show them these scopes, they will tell you that it is a very nice diamond. Which it is. Honestly, having looked through some of the posts on other websites, even the experts there have a much higher tolerance for what constitutes a good diamond. If you go and look at websites that provide ASET images like whiteflash, GoodOldGold etc, and look at their top of the range premium diamonds, they will look similar or worse than the ideal diamond you have, and probably be similar price or even higher).
I've looked at a number of websites, and so far, I have not been able to find a diamond in similar price and quality to what JP offered me. The fact that your diamond was not accepted as JP super ideal stock goes to show how stringent their quality control is, because in any other establishment, it would have been regarded as a very good diamond which can be placed in premium stock.
Haha, I was actually very surprised when they told another forumer that their diamond looks very good when the scope images actually sucks in pricescope. I think expectation for most C are low, except carat which they generally go highest at. Oh well, but actually under certain lighting, it does have a little different between ideal and super ideal, so my choice will still be super ideal unless budget constrain
Last edited: