Jackygogogo
Great Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2005
- Messages
- 54,688
- Reaction score
- 1
Make america great again bor.
Mossad leading them isis? Might as well gong it's a pappy ministar leading them as well.
My toe ish laughing too, no wander these fuggers are easily brainwashed.
Hmmm so terrorism started with the hotel bombing in 1946?
Then this group of arabs operating before counted as what? Freedom fighters? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hand_(Mandatory_Palestine)
zEDMASTER COME OUT FROM CAVE LEOW. non 50 pages no talk here.
Count them as anything you like.
If count as terrorist then your claim that jews did the 1st act of terrorism gone liao leh
You need to be more discerning.
The ensuing terror campaign began with the ambush and murder of three members of Kibbutz Yagur, 11 April 1931, a failed bombing attack on outlying Jewish homes in Haifa, in early 1932, and several operations that killed or wounded some four members of northern Jewish settlements. It climaxed with the deaths of a Jewish father and son in Nahalal, from a bomb thrown into their home, on 22 December 1932
Come out from trash hole liao lol.
So the black hand who did this
Are not terrorists?
Only the jews who dressed up as arabs and bombed the hotel in 1946 are considered the 1st terrorists who committed the 1st act of terrorism?
If you want to call that man a terrorist, you must also call his enemies terrorist too because both sides committed violence.
The bombing of King David hotel, a Jewish hotel, was committed by Jews themselves.
Like I've said, you need to be more discerning.
No surprise.
The first ever act of terrorism in the world was made by the Israelis and they were caught bombing a hotel dressed as Arabs. If they were not caught, the deed would have been blamed on the Arabs.
That was the first one.
I never say the jewish guys who bomb are not terrorists.
I think if u go check most of the world back then also labelled them terrorists.
But you are the one that claimed that that was the 1st act of terrorism
So all other acts before it not counted as terrorism lor.
So by your definition these acts committed by these arabs not counted as terrorism even though they look 100% like terrorism leh.
You need to be more discerning.
LOL
So now an armed conflict between two parties is considered terrorism.
Like that everything also terrorism.
The ensuing terror campaign began with the ambush and murder of three members of Kibbutz Yagur, 11 April 1931, a failed bombing attack on outlying Jewish homes in Haifa, in early 1932, and several operations that killed or wounded some four members of northern Jewish settlements. It climaxed with the deaths of a Jewish father and son in Nahalal, from a bomb thrown into their home, on 22 December 1932.
By 1935, Black Hand had several hundred men - the figures differ from 200 to 800 - organised in cells of 5 men, and arranged military training for peasants. The cells were equipped with bombs and firearms, which they used to raid Jewish settlements and sabotage British-constructed rail lines.
LOL
Now then i know the father and son in Nahalal who died when a bomb is thrown into their home is part of armed conflict. Jewish settlements are all combatants. Like this hor why dun rename the jewish settlements as the jewish army camps since all is combatants? The father and son should not be in their homes. Should call it their barracks right?
Like this hor can i extend it to ISIS or not? Using your definition when ISIS attacks cities and civilians also can consider them part of armed conflict? So ISIS is not terrorist but actually combatants?
Yes, the settlers are all militants. They are all armed. They arrived with a Bible in one hand and a rifle in the other. One says "your land belongs to me according to the Bible" and the other says "get out our we will force you out".
Civilians are not armed.