[Club Discussion]AMD Ryzen Members Club

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,346
Reaction score
1,139
39249556_10155850377235172_1050707214311882752_o.jpg

Atas components!
 

Encrypted11

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
5,731
Reaction score
116

concept_fuel

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
102
At his setting of secondaries and tetiary timings I'd say it's pretty good already.
No point really going higher unless your going for highest benches:o as memory scaling going higher with same timings would yield less than 1% improvement even with real world memory sensitive apps let alone cinebench.
 

Encrypted11

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
5,731
Reaction score
116
At his setting of secondaries and tetiary timings I'd say it's pretty good already.
No point really going higher unless your going for highest benches:o as memory scaling going higher with same timings would yield less than 1% improvement even with real world memory sensitive apps let alone cinebench.
Yeah samsung-b doable subs & latencies are in a different league compared to other ICs on any platform.

You've seen it 1st hand too :s34:
 

ikkozilla

Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
8,563
Reaction score
1
Wah. I also have. X370 Gaming K7 + 1600x w/ Wraith Max

Sent from 10kkj using GAGT
 

concept_fuel

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
102
That was the hard wall (gsat stable terms), even 30 Ohms on CAD Bus or more vddsoc couldn't overcome. Surprising they haven't started using agesa 1004 when it was here ard late june/early july time frame.


Yeah samsung-b doable subs & latencies are in a different league compared to other ICs on any platform.

You've seen it 1st hand too :s34:

:) yes.....I forgot to ask did you try lowering procodt maybe to 53 or 48.

Mine's gsat stable at 3466 on 48 not on 60 and 53 though but tbh though I'm getting lazy and lazier to tweak nowadays and like I said it's scales less than 1% so...


l698zjN.png
 

Encrypted11

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
5,731
Reaction score
116
Btw the memory copy rate is likely in the 2XXXXMB/s stock or 3XXXXXMB/s rate overclocked
If you do not manually allocate the memory to be used it will likely eat into the swap file stress test your SSD also and end up in a 4 digit to low 5 digit number, might not be adequately testing the memory hehe :o
(Side note: AMD Robert made this mistake on his own C7H build)

At 16GB I think specifying maybe 14000-14500MB works well. (stressapptest -M 14500 -W -s <time>)

But looking promising if more mhz+ geardown performs better than less mhz no geardown!

I tested 53.3 and 60 Ohms for ProcODT they both seem close than 48, stilt mentioned this is about getting the most correct value than higher lower
 
Last edited:

concept_fuel

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2007
Messages
1,145
Reaction score
102
Not sure what's up with gsat or that test run but I did specify using the -M option but it does not matter as I don't really run mine at that speed anyway. There's even some delay in completion of about 87 seconds due to gsat pausing worker threads due to power spike:s22:

Anyway for procodt there is no correct value if you're trying for higher speeds or 4 sticks of ram, just curious to see if you've tried that and you have:o. As long as it's within 40 to 60 and it's stable for your system than that is all that matters....mine is stable with 48 at higher speeds. It's still trail and error though as it differs from system to system even slot to slot due to varying distances of traces, temps and interferences or the alignment of the moon or what not:s13:.
 

Encrypted11

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
5,731
Reaction score
116
The general concensus for gsat seems like 1H recommended (per Raja@Asus and that they also use it for validation in house), but quite a number have observed 2H helps to catch edge cases for stability (e.g. extended hrs PC use, everything including DRAMs already running at an elevated temp).

You did 2 hr no errors, very good! :s34:
 

kenneth0601

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2008
Messages
5,344
Reaction score
0
39700613_550964845336808_2610721168230973440_o.jpg


39605735_550964992003460_5468249342181638144_o.jpg


Using for nearly a month, smooth sailing so far. Photo exports on Capture One Pro is noticeably faster, looking forward to render longer length videos on Da Vinci Resolve with this setup.
 

Psycovirus

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
1,756
Reaction score
332
2700X. Good la. Much less issues.

1700X gave me so much troubles, glad AMD got the issues ironed out for Ryzen 2 series.

Sent from Samsung SM-G965F using GAGT
 

Honeydewz

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
10,204
Reaction score
2,839
2600/2400/1600 which should i buy?

zIl82uv.jpg



For Gaming(most modern game), Streaming and Editing.

SCPmNnG.jpg
 

Cryogenist

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
1,702
Reaction score
72
2600/2400/1600 which should i buy?

For Gaming(most modern game), Streaming and Editing.
6c12t anytime over 4c8t 2400G unless you need the Vega IGPU for your described workload.

2600 over 1600. No point getting Ryzen Gen 1 now.

Sent from Samsung SM-G955F using GAGT
 

royfrosty

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 23, 2009
Messages
27,346
Reaction score
1,139
Get the 2600 if you can. Slightly better in performance, better ram support.
 

Red_herring

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2000
Messages
1,973
Reaction score
21
Anyone experience major improvements moving from Intel to ryzen for the below type of usage?

Handbrake - mainly converting my blu rays/DVD (30% usage) - blu rays sometimes takes about 1 1/2 hr to finish....
Gaming - 40% of the time
Doing simple ms office work - 10%
Surfing net / youtube - 20%

Currently using i7 6700 but motherboard giving problems. Was thinking whether to just change m/b or take chance to switch to ryzen 5/7.
 

haylui

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
29,806
Reaction score
92
Anyone experience major improvements moving from Intel to ryzen for the below type of usage?

Handbrake - mainly converting my blu rays/DVD (30% usage) - blu rays sometimes takes about 1 1/2 hr to finish....
Gaming - 40% of the time
Doing simple ms office work - 10%
Surfing net / youtube - 20%

Currently using i7 6700 but motherboard giving problems. Was thinking whether to just change m/b or take chance to switch to ryzen 5/7.

more threads on Ryzen can greatly improve on the converting time.
 

Ferolare

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
48,275
Reaction score
114
Anyone experience major improvements moving from Intel to ryzen for the below type of usage?

Handbrake - mainly converting my blu rays/DVD (30% usage) - blu rays sometimes takes about 1 1/2 hr to finish....
Gaming - 40% of the time
Doing simple ms office work - 10%
Surfing net / youtube - 20%

Currently using i7 6700 but motherboard giving problems. Was thinking whether to just change m/b or take chance to switch to ryzen 5/7.
idk about handbrake but using x264 cli and x265 cli i typically see the following average figures for transcoding bah

~33fps for x264 1080p
~11fps for x265 1080p

also, 1700 o/c'd to 3.7ghz all core (basically a fake 1800X)
max cpu usage
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top