so you are saying after he spent 400m , most players he bought arent performing, after 3 years the team looks like they just met each other. however its not his fault. nothing to do with SAF, SAF's tactics meant that even if u sub somebody out, the standin can do a job. however what is our style now?
vickyboi wrote:
so on that note are you saying during SAF's time he always played the duds (there have been a few btw) while depending on the strengths of his other areas to win? i don't think so. he ensures he gets better replacements or able multi-functioning players.
the vitriol against JM is seriously unfounded. everyone is targeting him instead of the root of the problem which so many people can see.