*** HWC OFFICIAL SHOW YOUR RIGs/Desktops thread ***

koroshiya8

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
37,687
Reaction score
496
finally repainted my room last wekend.

Before
rYsWrxb.jpg

Now
ueEthn2.jpg


O0dNyng.jpg
 
Last edited:

Techronix Computer

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2019
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So the g1 distro plate is not a reservoir
but just act as a fancy piping to carry water to various pt

Lian Li O-11D Distro-Plate G1 with DDC pump is more on reservoir + pump combo. I'm not sure about the capacity of the reservoir as I have not ask from the distributor yet regarding this product.
 

5star_pundit

Banned
Joined
Aug 11, 2015
Messages
26,742
Reaction score
5
The big portion on the right acts as a reservoir, just not as much as what a normal res would hold.

Lian Li O-11D Distro-Plate G1 with DDC pump is more on reservoir + pump combo. I'm not sure about the capacity of the reservoir as I have not ask from the distributor yet regarding this product.

Where is the installation manual ?
 

pikoman

Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Thermaltake riing trio. Looks good, performance average, enough for such a small case. The only disadvantage is bad TT software, I can't control the PWM using the motherboard, only via software.
 

ayuluv

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
1
Thermaltake riing trio. Looks good, performance average, enough for such a small case. The only disadvantage is bad TT software, I can't control the PWM using the motherboard, only via software.

Thanks alot for sharing mate
Really love your color style haha


I will try to do without it and see if I can take it as I need to deal with 7 fans
 

ayuluv

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
9,715
Reaction score
1
A more proper image for my Lian Li PC-O11D XL Ryzen 9 Rig with Color Cycle

u2Efc6g.png


h4IUVvk.png
 

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
5,894
Reaction score
1,107
My New Custom Loop

So I was offered a very good price for my old 9700k setup that I decided to go for a full custom loop this time around with my partner.


20191120-085250.jpg



20191120-085235.jpg



20191119-201350.jpg

20191120-005545.jpg


20191112-193917.jpg


vyhzMdM.jpg
 
Last edited:

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
5,894
Reaction score
1,107
oic, nice :)
btw, i no idea abt ibt test but strange that ur gflops are lower than 6700k 4.9ghz abt 136 gflops, https://www.overclock.net/forum/5-i...ocking-guide-statistics-183.html#post24428686

Yeah even my 9700k was faster not sure if it has anything to do with hyper-threading. But I was running 4.7Ghz uncore overclocked compared to 4.3Ghz uncore on the 9900KS which is stock setting. IntelBurnTest is heavily dependent on your memory subsystem more than CPU. I have issues with stability at 4.7Ghz on the 9900KS so I just left it at stock first. Maybe will try to push slowly at a later time.

3Dmark CPU test my 9700K @ 5.0Ghz was 8803 points but my 9900KS @ 5.3Ghz is 11.860 so I think everything is working as it should.

How much uncore you think I should increase from 4.3Ghz without increasing voltage?
 
Last edited:

hlots123

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
5,213
Reaction score
11

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
5,894
Reaction score
1,107
https://www.3dmark.com/newsearch#ad...Mode=false&showInvalidResults=false&max=11860
^ most 11860 scores are 5.0-5.1 for 9900k, so its hard to say

i rem some suggest cache to be abt -3 from core, while some suggest it doesn't matter & can leave at stock - i'll try for the former, but if can't then as long as ur stable...
Can't tell how much u can raise cache w/o more volts, perhaps try 4.5-4.6 1st...

Yeah good idea. I'll probably try 5.2Ghz at 1.35V and try 4.6Ghz for cache. 4.7Ghz cache for my 9900KS definitely not stable but then again many 9900k overclockers also have the same issue. Not able to run 4.5-4.6 at 5.1Ghz/5.2Ghz clock speed.
 
Last edited:

hlots123

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2006
Messages
5,213
Reaction score
11
Yeah even my 9700k was faster not sure if it has anything to do with hyper-threading.
yeah since ibt is old, maybe it does not register all 16 threads properly either in the results or the run.
i see more pple run linpack xtreme instead of ibt nowadays (tho i dun dare run either, hehh):

euHgQop.png


Not able to run 4.5-4.6 at 5.1Ghz/5.2Ghz clock speed.
shucks, hmm i dunno...
 

elmariachi

Supremacy Member
Joined
May 30, 2005
Messages
5,894
Reaction score
1,107
yeah since ibt is old, maybe it does not register all 16 threads properly either in the results or the run.
i see more pple run linpack xtreme instead of ibt nowadays (tho i dun dare run either, hehh):

euHgQop.png


shucks, hmm i dunno...

I just comapred my 3Dmark timespy CPU scores and they fall in line with those that are running similar memory speeds. Those running >4,000Mhz DDR4 speeds are all hitting high 11k's and low 12's at 5.2/5.3Ghz.

I have since dropped my overclock to 5.2Ghz at 1.35V and actually my uncore can now run at 4.7Ghz! I think at 5.3Ghz my uncore at 4.7 was very stable but I did not want to add any more voltage at 1.42V.

So anyway now happy with 5.2Ghz at 1.35V and 3Dmark CPU score I am getting around 11,600 points. :)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top