This car looks good esp interior & review was pretty good. 1.5T @ 9.9s to 100kmh is quite decent. Only thing is whether people can get pass the MIC.U can try MG HS
This car looks good esp interior & review was pretty good. 1.5T @ 9.9s to 100kmh is quite decent. Only thing is whether people can get pass the MIC.U can try MG HS
This car looks good esp interior & review was pretty good. 1.5T @ 9.9s to 100kmh is quite decent. Only thing is whether people can get pass the MIC.
From test drive I was really impressed with forester suspension. Over bumps and drain covers the forester really shines in terms of comfort.
The low CG (boxer engine and AWD) allows them to use softer springs without sacrificing on body roll.
Also if you prefer agent servicing, Mazda definitely not the cheapest. For example, 60k servicing for mazda3 is about $800. Regular service is about $300. May be good idea to negotiate for servicing package until warranty over.
Spare parts wise I hear from mechanics that mazda parts tend to be more expensive. But couldn't verify as the parts seem to last very long.
It’s very true Mazda AD servicing is expensive and IMO not worth it. Do outside workshop can easily save 50%. Subaru AD servicing also expensive but not as crazy.
What really turns me off at Mazda is that my service officer who dgaf, some others are much better and can plainly see the difference.
Why ppl say awd not useful in Sg?
Unless u go offroad.. else awd or 4wd is practically not useful
not sure if you have driven a subaru before
1) take off feels different. it feels like the whole car move together, instead of head pulling the tail. more obvious on slopes are expressways.
2) on wet weather, which is not uncommon in Sg, given same tyre between AWD and non AWD, those who drive Subbies will know how stable it is to drive.
these practical points are something that when you drive subbies, then u go back drive FF, you know
E only subaru i drove before is Legacy for a short trip..
Yeah i know good for slippery road due to more traction provided by awd but most cars today aredy have e relevant tech to deal with it.. n how slippery is sg road to begin with and we dun snow. So personally i find it not practical.
e set up of awd or 4wd is more complex than 2wd.. i.e. u may need pay more for repair if smthg happen (touchwood)
Also it increase ur fc cos e engine need more power to move 4 instead of 2 wheels
FC deltas prolly result in $20-40 a month?
on the greater scale of things, that amount really doesn't translate much to most car owners who drive not for livinghood.
SG don't really need 4WD/AWD, good tyres matter the most.Should consider outlander too. Me from wish to sienta to outlander...
Specs, FC, power is sufficient. But would be good if they hv 4wd for the 2.0 sg version.
SG don't really need 4WD/AWD, good tyres matter the most.