[Lest We Forget] Our CV19 Story: When Complacency Meets Indecisiveness; S'pore & Singaporeans Suffer

Transcendent

Master Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2006
Messages
2,761
Reaction score
382
Personally noticed the lack of any IBs in this thread. All speechless and unable to give any rebuttal. Up for TS.
 

Savantrainmaker

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
12,124
Reaction score
434
Countries and places that did not treat CV19 lightly from the onset and did well against preventing the enter and spread of the virus are now reaping the economic benefits.

Case in point, Taiwan. Both its manufacturing exports were minimally disrupted and its internal economy are continued undisrupted because the people could still go out and about freely to work and spend on consumption to drive the economy.

Believe it is also one of the few places on earth that had a positive smartphone sale/growth in the 1H of 2020.

Rest of the world dropped by a massive 20% on the average.
 

tokiya

Banned
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
9,021
Healthy no need wear mask.

Jalan Jalan local attractions.

After 0 community cases, we now have rising cases again. Is this complacency?
 

tokiya

Banned
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
9,021
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/new...ne-better-gan-kim-yong-lawrence-wong-14012404

Looking back on the fight against the pandemic in the past year, co-chair of the COVID-19 multi-ministry taskforce and Education Minister Lawrence Wong admitted there were "certainly many things" that could have been done better.

"At the start of the year, when we were fighting this virus, there was so much uncertainty, so many things we didn't know. We didn't know about the asymptomatic nature of transmission; we didn't know how infectious it was," Mr Wong said in an interview with the media on Tuesday (Jan 19), alongside his co-chair, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong.

The interview was conducted just ahead of Singapore marking a year since it identified its first case of COVID-19 on Jan 23, 2020. Mr Wong added that if they had had "a better picture then", authorities would have "taken different measures", without detailing any specific instances. "Not everything we'll get right, that's for sure. The key, as I've said before, is that we have to be quick to adapt to adjust, to be nimble, put things right, recover from setbacks and move forward. And that's the attitude we've had," he said.

Mr Gan acknowledged that the possibility of asymptomatic transmission - where patients could be infectious even before showing symptoms - was an important characteristic about the virus they did not expect.

"If you remember in the very beginning, we said if you're unwell with flu-like symptoms, go back, take five days MC and if you don't recover, come and see the doctor again then we'll test you," Mr Gan said.

Authorities later realised that would not work, and decided to swab everyone who was symptomatic "so as to catch them earlier", he said.

"Even then, that's not enough, because by the time you're symptomatic and see a doctor, you've already gone few days as infectious. Therefore, even our contact tracing had to move backwards much longer so as to catch and detect more people who could have been exposed," he added.

Responding to another question on how authorities could have avoided or mitigated the dramatic rise in cases in migrant worker dormitories, Mr Wong said: "We would have done what we're doing today in the dorms. We'd be putting everyone on regular testing regimes. We would have taken far more measures that we had at that time, obviously.

"The challenge is if you were to think back at that time - it's one thing to say I hope we can do it. But we didn't have testing capabilities to test to the level we have today.

"So it's also a question of wanting do something, but do you have the ability to carry it out and execute it?"

Mr Wong added that there were limited resources in terms of manpower as well, and deploying one resource to a particular area would have meant channelling it away from another.

Both ministers reiterated an earlier pledge to conduct a full review of how the pandemic was handled, to see how processes and systems may be improved.

CIRCUIT BREAKER WAS TOUGH JUDGMENT CALL: MINISTERS

Singapore's partial lockdown from Apr 7 to Jun 1 last year, which came to be known as the "circuit breaker", was one of the most difficult decisions authorities had to make, the ministers said.

According to Mr Wong, they knew it would be "quite drastic", with a significant impact on livelihoods and people's mental wellbeing.

"How will it impact the vulnerable and elderly, and on balance, will it do more harm than good, or will we be able to address and effectively slow down transmission? That was a very tough decision to make, and there was a lot of uncertainty," he added.

And if the decision to implement the circuit breaker was tough, questions on how and when to end it were no less difficult.

"It's so easy to say: 'Be tight'. But for how long? Forever? One year, everyone cannot see each other? I think we will all go crazy," said Mr Wong. "So what's the right balance, and how to make such calibrations amid such great uncertainty?"

Mr Gan echoed that the move was very tricky because it also needed to be timed precisely.

"If you do it too soon, it's not going to be effective. Then if you lift the circuit breaker and everything crops up, you must do it a second time … If you do it too late then it's not going to help because you're going to already have a big cluster in your hands.

"So we needed to time it, but we can never be perfect in timing, so you just have to have a sense and make a judgment," he said.

Breaking into a small smile, Mr Gan added: "That's why I said Lawrence was very decisive, said if we have to move, then move."

He was referencing an earlier question posed to the ministers about what it was like working so closely with each other throughout the pandemic.

"Once the facts are clear, there are no ifs and buts, just move and get it done, so I think I'm very happy to be working with him, and it's even enjoyable working with him - a very decisive co-chairman," he said.

Returning the compliment, Mr Wong said he was fortunate to have known Mr Gan through other organisations, such as the PAP Community Foundation and the Singapore Labour Foundation, even before working together on the task force.

"In many ways, he's been a great mentor … he has guided me along in the transition of chairmanship in these two positions … it has been a very pleasant and good working relationship because it was built on a relationship we already have."

With a laugh, Mr Wong added: "He's literally on my speed dial. I disturb him all the time."

THE BIGGEST CHALLENGES

The issue of uncertainty arose several times during the interview, with both ministers describing it as the biggest challenge in tackling COVID-19.

"As and when we needed to change our approach, we needed to move the whole-of-Government machinery to implement these changes," said Mr Gan.

"We have to explain to people, communicate with Singaporeans to let them understand why we are introducing these measures and why we need do certain things that are not very popular, very tough," he explained.


Another huge challenge was managing public sentiment. Mr Wong cited how at the start of the year, many people had clamoured for strict measures and believed the situation might "be over in a month", but authorities had to warn that it was going to be a "long fight, a marathon".

But when the number of local cases dipped, sentiment swung, said Mr Wong. "The mood was: Why don't we open faster, why are we still doing Phase 2 measures, when can we get to Phase 3?"

He added: "That's how (public mood) shifts so quickly and easily … to maintain a steady course and make sure that whatever we do, yes we have to take into account public opinion and feedback, but it ultimately has to be based on scientific evidence, data, expert opinion, and then explain that to the public and get public support for the measures. That's, to me, one of the biggest challenges."

"THEY MADE THE IMPOSSIBLE POSSIBLE"

Wrapping up the interview, the ministers also reflected on the most memorable parts of the past year's fight against COVID-19.

For Mr Gan, one such instance was witnessing how quickly community care facilities, such as the one at Singapore Expo, were put together. He said he was also moved by watching how people from different sectors - public and private - came together in a time of crisis to help.

Mr Wong added: "They made the impossible possible … If they had not done this, Singapore's trajectory through COVID-19 would've been quite different."

He also cited how students at a school he visited had been writing thank you letters to frontline and essential workers.

"That was very heartening too … Hopefully, emerging from this crisis, we will be able to become a more inclusive, more gracious society because of (how) there is a greater appreciation for the important contributions that these people make, and we will have a greater sense of respect for work they do," Mr Wong said.
 
Last edited:

tokiya

Banned
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
13,149
Reaction score
9,021
Only trust the PAP to do what is right for Singapore. Ignore the armchair critics.

Wong also touched on the online "experts" that have emerged during the crisis:

"We are also seeing the downgrading of expertise. Because experts are seen as out- of-touch elites, and expert knowledge is sometimes portrayed negatively as a conspiracy by the elites to perpetuate their dominance.

[...]

And with easy access to information, everyone can claim to be an expert. Let's look at how many armchair epidemiologists have emerged during this crisis. Virtually everyone thinks they can say something intelligent about how the virus spreads."

However, he also acknowledged that the pseudo-experts serve their own purpose:

"Nothing wrong with that. And in fact, it leads to more scepticism and questioning of expert advice, which is, in a way, healthy, because you know experts don't always get it right, you do need to have some level of questioning."

But he cautions against disregarding expertise or self-selecting information just to reinforce our own points of view without seeing things from another perspective.

This would make it very hard to "find consensus", and thus allow extreme views to gain ground and become a divisive point for society.

https://mothership.sg/2021/01/lawre..._yM9gdMXl_6JbQw-CTeBUqHWxSz5x0aLFQmeeAgGBUX2E
 

justice89

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
7,321
Reaction score
1,010
During SARs......we are swift, decisive and efficient! last recall they very fast make those prison to quarantine area.......instill authority tell people if quarantine will be in prison.........normal people where got botah boji want to live in prison.....indirectly minimise gathering, economic activities.......thou our economy suffered...but was short term pain and we recovered.


:s13::s13: now we like to drag.......look for short term economic benefits....ignoring the long term impact that will come :s13: machiam like betting vaccinations will save us all.....sibeh funny.

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/reg...rang-park-rehab-centre-to-hold--rule-breakers

https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB105112103482952500
 
Last edited:

standarture

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2009
Messages
46,375
Reaction score
9,684
The only way is ensure more records of this healthy no mask, jalan jalan local attractions, dorm fiasco, import FT are available online! Lest we forget our mistakes!
 

Savantrainmaker

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
12,124
Reaction score
434
The only way is ensure more records of this healthy no mask, jalan jalan local attractions, dorm fiasco, import FT are available online! Lest we forget our mistakes!

Actually, it would be interesting if they reveal the statistics of people served with SHN notices and COVID testing based on the three instruments of trace together, safe entry and temperature screening.
 

Horiv3

Master Member
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
2,866
Reaction score
1,012
Noticed that this thread has been moved to Current Affairs Lounge, how come?
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top