luci3l
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2008
- Messages
- 1,546
- Reaction score
- 0
Working for WP now!
Those no job one, or complain FT steal their jobs one should work for WP TC!
Yes, Sylvia Lim said she will take PERSONAL responsibility. That is a powerful statement. But it also meant that all the mismanagement is due to her own mistakes. Instead of just saying, she has to show that as well. She has to go. Resign from her role as chairman. That is what taking responsibility is all about.
Some people don't understand the concept of fairness and equality, justice for the nation...
The people made a democratic choice, not once but 3 times (including the 2 by-elections) and the message should be loud and clear but little people still want to play schoolyard politics...
If THEY spend their listening and showing that they are not resting on past achievements, maybe, the people might just vote them back...
With all these childish games (MND, hawker centres, PA 'leaders'), they have probably made the 20-30% into hardcore supporters and helping to influence the decision of those on the fence.
Personally, I would rather support a team which makes mistakes but is humble enough to learn and change from them than a team which spends its time 'fixing' others and stubbornly refuse to listen to different opinions....
I think good move by WP.. this new approach means WP MPs are really the ones running the estate, not managing a company that manage the estate. This way overall responsibility is with the MPs and cannot pass the buck to managing agent.
So if WP MPs begins to run their own Town Council, like a full-time MP.. this will exceed many PAP MPs.
To me this is up the ante, can PAP MPs do this?? or even willing to take on a more involved role? already once a week meet the people session is taxing.
I am not saying running estate versus having a managing agent run is good or bad, but it does show some difference, running own estate requires more commitment on time and effort.
I think good move by WP.. this new approach means WP MPs are really the ones running the estate, not managing a company that manage the estate. This way overall responsibility is with the MPs and cannot pass the buck to managing agent.
So if WP MPs begins to run their own Town Council, like a full-time MP.. this will exceed many PAP MPs.
To me this is up the ante, can PAP MPs do this?? or even willing to take on a more involved role? already once a week meet the people session is taxing.
I am not saying running estate versus having a managing agent run is good or bad, but it does show some difference, running own estate requires more commitment on time and effort.
So are you speaking up for the silent majority in the online forum or u are just mocking them ?
Talk until got dragon got tiger in ST, but behave a ****
Singapore has already divided... rip Singapore... it will soon get annexed
The questions were not about WP/AHPETC.
They were about FMSS.
They seem to be only working for AHPETC and set up soon after GE2011 to take on AHPETC work.
Now they did not bid when LTK said before "no one wants to work for him".
FMSS will almost certainly get the contract if they bid.
Why didn't they?
Pretty strange, isn't it?
Just because I am a new member means I must be clone of someone?
Hard truth 1: Aljunied have a contract with CPFG whom cannot unilaterally cancel the contract without Aljunied permission meaning WP cancelled that contract. LTK is lying about this
Hard Truth 2: Even if it was true they could have run the TC themselves like how Potong Pasir and Toa Payoh GRC is run.
Hard Truth 3: The judge of the AHPETC vs MND case have stated that LTK and gang lie in Parliament
I find it incredible how their supporters can still blindly believe them
Both, those who hate the PAP and are jobless because of the FT issue, should go and apply for the job. You get a chance to earn some money and give a _|_ to the PAP.
On the other hand, those csb, whole day only kbkp say low paying job, behkan job, no job cause of the PAP but then asked to do something concrete for their lives but refuse to, then