HWZ Forums

Login Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Compensation for punitive damages should not flow into plaintiff pockets.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 13-08-2018, 12:13 AM   #1
Master Member
 
cherry6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,275
Compensation for punitive damages should not flow into plaintiff pockets.

Compensation for punitive damages should not flow into plaintiff pockets.

I read with concern in the report that Monsanto will be paying UDS250M in punitive damages but only $39M in actual "compensatory damages and other costs".

Punitive damages should accrue to society and should the plaintiff request for punitive damages to be paid, then the plaintiff (/ assisting voluntary welfare organisation etc) should also make a statement of case warranting the penalty: i.e. documenting the currently unfair practise corporates and how such funds will be used to assist and protect victims against such forms of corporate violence etc.

Plaintiff victims of corporate misdeeds should only receive the compensatory damage portion of claims which should accurately compensate for any relevant damage they suffered, society and its protective voluntary welfare organizations (VWOs) shouldn't be short changed of funds arising from such 'punitive damages ' just as speeding ticket summons accrue funds to the state towards providing for necessary social goods. VWOs should be invited to submit requests for punitive damages should the defendent lose but any request will be scrutinized by the courts and society at large for its purpose and reasonableness in the light of the egregiousness of the offending corporate misconduct.

Usually, such corporates when found guilty of such harmful and egregious misconduct, have cause damage to multitudes of other victims besides just the plaintiff who sued. By channeling the necessary funds towards VWOs, more members of society can be helped and society will be stronger and more robust for that.
=======
Monsanto Ordered to Pay $289 Million in World's First Roundup Cancer Trial




More

FILE PHOTO: Monsanto Co's Roundup is shown for sale in Encinitas, California, U.S., June 26, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File PhotoREUTERS

BY TINA BELLON

(Reuters) - A California jury on Friday found Monsanto liable in a lawsuit filed by a man who alleged the company's glyphosate-based weed-killers, including Roundup, caused his cancer and ordered the company to pay $289 million in damages.

The case of school groundskeeper Dewayne Johnson was the first lawsuit to go to trial alleging glyphosate causes cancer. Monsanto, a unit of Bayer AG following a $62.5 billion acquisition by the German conglomerate, faces more than 5,000 similar lawsuits across the United States.

The jury at San Francisco's Superior Court of California deliberated for three days before finding that Monsanto had failed to warn Johnson and other consumers of the cancer risks posed by its weed killers.


It awarded $39 million in compensatory and $250 million in punitive damages.

Monsanto in a statement said it would appeal the verdict. "Today’s decision does not change the fact that more than 800 scientific studies and reviews...support the fact that glyphosate does not cause cancer, and did not cause Mr. Johnson’s cancer," the company said.

Monsanto denies that glyphosate, the world's most widely used herbicide, causes cancer and says decades of scientific studies have shown the chemical to be safe for human use.

Johnson's case, filed in 2016, was fast-tracked for trial due to the severity of his non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, a cancer of the lymph system that he alleges was caused by Roundup and Ranger Pro, another Monsanto glyphosate herbicide. Johnson's doctors said he is unlikely to live past 2020.

A former pest control manager for a California county school system, Johnson, 46, applied the weed killer up to 30 times per year.

Brent Wisner, a lawyer for Johnson, in a statement said jurors for the first time had seen internal company documents "proving that Monsanto has known for decades that glyphosate and specifically Roundup could cause cancer." He called on Monsanto to "put consumer safety first over profits."

Over the course of the four-week trial, jurors heard testimony by statisticians, doctors, public health researchers and epidemiologists who disagreed on whether glyphosate can cause cancer.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in September 2017 concluded a decades-long assessment of glyphosate risks and found the chemical not likely carcinogenic to humans. But the World Health Organization's cancer arm in 2015 classified glyphosate as "probably carcinogenic to humans."

(Reporting by Tina Bellon; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

Copyright 2018 Thomson Reuters

https://www.usnews.com/news/top-news...p-cancer-trial

Last edited by cherry6; 13-08-2018 at 12:18 AM..
cherry6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Terms of Service for more information.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On