HWZ Forums

Login Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Trade War is easy, someone got duped...

Like Tree2Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 17-05-2019, 05:48 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
Trade War is easy, someone got duped...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...KCN1SE0WJ?il=0

The document was riddled with reversals by China that undermined core U.S. demands, the sources told Reuters.

In each of the seven chapters of the draft trade deal, China had deleted its commitments to change laws to resolve core complaints that caused the United States to launch a trade war: theft of U.S. intellectual property and trade secrets; forced technology transfers; competition policy; access to financial services; and currency manipulation.

__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:49 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
schlong schlong schlong

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-...owest-bidcover

Overall, a very ugly auction, and if China wanted to send a message to the US, it clearly succeeded judging by the violent repricing in the 10Y whose immediately yield promptly blew out by over 2 bps.
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:50 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
https://www.scmp.com/economy/global-...gn-investments

There was little fanfare last month when China’s central planning agency quietly had its remit expanded to govern whether inward investments threaten national security.

However, experts are suggesting that the new powers, together with a new article in its foreign investment law, gives China a legitimate platform to make a strong legal case against US firms investing in the country, as the trade war escalates.

__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:50 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnbri.../#43a103a15b9c

On July 25 of last year, President Trump and European Union President Jean-Claude Juncker agreed to start negotiations toward a U.S.-E.U. trade agreement that would reduce or eliminate tariffs on non-automotive industrial goods. In a joint statement, they agreed that agriculture would not be discussed, except that the E.U. would increase the volume of American-grown soybeans it buys.

Either Trump and his trade officials have forgotten the no-ag agreement or they’re worried that American farmers’ patience with Trump’s trade war, and thus Trump himself, is running out. Or, they’re worried that Congress won’t ratify an agreement that excludes agriculture. Whatever the reason, Trump has reneged on that commitment;the administration is now seeking “secure comprehensive market access for U.S. agricultural goods in the EU by reducing or eliminating tariffs.”


just an example of trump, so many more case history, leave u to find.

moral of the story,

screw him first before he chut pattern and screw u

__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:51 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/13/this...get-worse.html



“New evidence on the effects of the 2018 tariff rounds from two detailed academic studies points to larger effects on US consumer prices than we had previously estimated, admitted Goldman Sachs Chief Economist Jan Hatzius, in a note to clients Saturday. “First, the costs of US tariffs have fallen entirely on US businesses and households, with no clear reduction in the prices charged by Chinese exporters. Second, the effects of the tariffs have spilled over noticeably to the prices charged by US producers competing with tariff-affected goods.”

ndnt no data no talk.
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:51 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
trump is the best president for china...

https://www.axios.com/donald-trump-u...a6f370238.html

I've asked several current and former administration officials whether Trump actually believes that China pays the tariffs — rather than the reality that U.S. importers and consumers do.

The consensus is "yes": That's what he actually believes.
And as one former aide said: There’s little point trying to persuade Trump otherwise, because his belief in tariffs is "like theology."
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:52 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471


long preparation made for the time when the dragon cannot hide its claws.
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:53 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
and banning huawei is a nuclear option ...

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/healt...s-drug-n900716

FDA recalls are a reminder that China controls much of world's drug supply
"If we were ever in an international incident with China, they would literally have their hands around our necks in terms of critical drugs."
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 05:55 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKCN1SK1R5

U.S. leaves rare earths, critical minerals off China tariff list
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 06:29 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
xjp shows he lacks blood spirit.
but he and liu are alone...

https://asia.nikkei.com/Editor-s-Pic...ual-trade-deal

How Xi Jinping's colleagues rejected an 'unequal' trade deal
MAY 16, 2019

TOKYO -- Early this month, the Chinese government sent the U.S. a trade deal draft that had been slashed from 150 pages -- painstakingly assembled by both sides over five months of negotiations -- to 105.

The move riled U.S. President Donald Trump and brought progress on the trade talks to a screeching halt, as Beijing surely knew it would.

To understand why China went ahead anyway, we must go back to late April, when Chinese President Xi Jinping's schedule was packed with events in and around Beijing. The first was the second Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation, on April 25-27, which brought together leaders from more than 30 countries.

While it was a moment in the sun for Xi, his disposition was far from sunny.

At the first forum two years ago, a large display at the event's media center followed Xi's every step as he strutted around the venue alongside other world leaders, with a confident smile befitting the head of a global superpower.

This year, images of Xi strolling were nowhere to be found. When the president began his address, at an unannounced time, the display abruptly popped up in the media center -- almost as if the organizers did not want to show his gloomy countenance for long.


At the time, the world's hopes were still high for a speedy U.S.-China trade deal, but Xi was no doubt aware that a tense domestic situation made a quick compromise extremely unlikely.

The night after the event, Xi, clad in a heavy coat, watched a lavish display of fireworks outside Beijing. Again he was alongside other world leaders and VIPs. The show was part of the opening ceremony of the International Horticultural Exposition, one of a string of big events organized as a lead-up to the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics.

The fireworks did not put Xi's mind at ease. The U.S. had not sent a delegation to either the Belt and Road forum or the gardening expo.

Voices within the Chinese Communist Party, growing louder day by day, were insisting that "an unequal treaty that codifies meddling in our domestic affairs into law is unacceptable."

These cries came not only from the party's conservative left but also from the rank and file -- from the core of workers and management at state-owned companies, from industries that rely on subsidies for survival and from the bureaucratic institutions that protect them. The proposed deal threatened their interests.

When modern China was established seven decades ago, the party denounced the "unequal treaties" China signed under imperial rule, exemplified by the 1842 Treaty of Nanking with Great Britain, which ended the First Opium War, and the 1895 Treaty of Shimonoseki, which ended the first Sino-Japanese war.


The Shimonoseki agreement forced the Qing dynasty to pay an indemnity to Japan and hand over Taiwan. The dynasty would not last two more decades.

Whether the proposed deal between the U.S. and China really qualified as an "unequal treaty" is debatable, but regardless, it cut to the communist government's heart. It would forbid forced technology transfers by a variety of both public and private means, theft of foreign technology or intellectual property, subsidies to state-owned enterprises and export subsidies given to all companies.

It is easy to understand the argument that the legal measures demanded by Washington were an unacceptable form of interference that violated China's principles.


In late April, Xi was forced into an about-face in his negotiating tactics. The negotiating team, led by Vice Premier Liu He, one of Xi's close aides, had focused too much on reaching an amicable resolution and stepped outside the bounds of the discretion granted by party leadership.

But the Xi-Liu axis would never compromise on the most vital points -- those intertwined with Communist Party rule. This is "the last 10%" that U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin have said stood in the way of a deal.

The talks broke down not over that 10% but over the 90% that had already been agreed to by Liu and Lighthizer. Shuttling back and forth between Beijing and Washington for multiple rounds of talks, the two teams had collaborated on that 150-page document, which covered seven areas.

Liu must have felt some attachment to the draft. The text was carefully constructed, with the Chinese and English versions meticulously compared. Lighthizer, who negotiated successfully with Japan in the 1980s, examined it with an international lawyer's eyes. The Chinese side even grew sick of his constant scrutinizing of the wording, sources familiar with the talks said.

Even so, the deal moved 90% of the way to its goal. Given Liu's closeness with Xi, it should stand to reason that at least the overall outline of the agreement had the approval of China's leadership.


Yet the text went back to the U.S. gutted. From Washington's point of view, the agreement was now nothing more than 105 pages of words, with nearly all of the legal and other mechanisms to ensure compliance ripped out. It was proof that Beijing had given up on reaching a quick conclusion.

The first sign that the negotiations had hit a wall came on May 5, when U.S. President Donald Trump tweeted about tariffs on imports from China going up to 25%. But by that time a heightened trade war was a foregone conclusion. China had already informed the U.S. of the significantly watered-down draft.

Chinese media have reported that Xi said he will take responsibility "for all consequences."

Xi is believed to have made this pledge to either the seven-person Politburo Standing Committee or the full 25-member Politburo. Those gatherings would have taken place after the two big events, most likely at the end of April or the first days of May.

The Politburo Standing Committee consists of Xi, who has the power to convene a meeting and chair it; Li Keqiang, the premier; and five other top party figures. If the seven cannot come to a unanimous decision, a vote is taken, with each member, including Xi, having one vote each.

Every important decision, by rule, must be approved by the wider Politburo.

The reports about Xi pledging to take responsibility smell of propaganda. The decision to show the U.S. the revised draft was made before Liu flew to Washington for trade talks late last week and would have been made collectively at the highest level.

Despite being positioned as the "core" of the party leadership, even Xi cannot overturn a collective decision without securing the consent of the party leaders.

The Xi-Liu duo, which has been leading the trade negotiations, was, in effect, shackled.

This is a sign that, seven years into his rule, Xi's political momentum is slowing. While garnering unrivaled power through an anti-corruption campaign that eliminated his rivals, the president has little to show the public in terms of economic achievement.

The credit of expanding China's economy into the world's second largest goes to Xi's predecessors.

When Liu appeared in Washington last week, he no longer had the title of being Xi's "special envoy." His sole mission was to convey to the world that negotiations had not collapsed and that they will go on.


On May 10, while Liu was still in town, the Trump administration imposed additional import tariffs on $200 billion worth of Chinese goods. China responded days later, announcing retaliatory tariffs on $60 billion worth of U.S. imports.

Adding to the pressure, the Trump administration then released details of a fourth round of punitive import tariffs, on about $300 billion worth of Chinese good, to be imposed after a public comment period that lasts until late June.

There is still time to talk, and Trump has said he will meet with Xi in Osaka, on the sidelines of the Group of 20 leaders summit. The two-day meeting begins June 28.

When the presidents sit down together, at stake will be the implementation of tariffs on all Chinese exports to the U.S.

The Chinese media is hardening its stance, pounding the argument that China can never compromise on principle issues.

Xi has no easy task.

Katsuji Nakazawa is a Tokyo-based senior staff writer and editorial writer at Nikkei. He has spent seven years in China as a correspondent and later as China bureau chief. He is the 2014 recipient of the Vaughn-Ueda International Journalist prize for international reporting.
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-05-2019, 06:31 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
xjp replacement in sight.

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/poli...e-president-xi

Man once ‘most likely’ to replace Chinese President Xi Jinping named as a vice-premier

Jun Mai
Published: 10:58pm, 19 Mar, 2018
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-05-2019, 07:39 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...t-block-huawei

“Our perspective is not to block Huawei or any company,” Macron said at a technology conference in Paris. “France and Europe are pragmatic and realistic. We do believe in cooperation and multilateralism. At the same time, we are extremely careful about access to good technology and to preserve our national security and all the safety rules.”

Macron’s remarks reflect the mood across the region. While Germany plans to tighten the rules governing the security of its telecom networks, Chancellor Angela Merkel has made it clear she won’t single out any one supplier.
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2019, 01:36 PM   #13
Arch-Supremacy Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 18,869
https://youtu.be/3ViYA_p4BTE
cscs3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2019, 06:16 AM   #14
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1150799.shtml

Diao told the Global Times on Monday the deal is related to the airworthiness certification of China's home-built C919.

"At least it can pave way for C919's entering the EU market in terms of normalization," said Diao.
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21-05-2019, 06:22 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
DFR6868's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,471
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...s-on-his-watch

The president also told Hilton he believed China wants to replace America as the world’s leading superpower, and it’s “not going to happen with me.”

“I think that’s their intention,” he said. “Why wouldn’t it be? I mean they’re very ambitious people, they’re very smart.”



some peepur now get know how naked they are

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion...hucydides-trap

There is no Thucydides Trap



https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/05/02...rump-doctrine/

The Slip That Revealed the Real Trump Doctrine
Talk of clashing civilizations reveals the racist, and dangerous, lens of the new U.S. statecraft.
BY PAUL MUSGRAVE | MAY 2, 2019

U.S. competition with China would be especially bitter, she argued, because “it’s the first time that we will have a great-power competitor that is not Caucasian.”

To the extent that there is a Trump Doctrine, Skinner nailed it: It’s the belief that culture and identity are fundamental to whether great-power relations will be cooperative or conflictual.
__________________
Tian You Yan 天有眼

dun just bark, trip the tripwire!

Last edited by DFR6868; 21-05-2019 at 06:34 AM..
DFR6868 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Terms of Service for more information.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On