Hi, is there any reason why you recommended Andy over Manfred? I heard a lot of mix reviews about Andy and not v sure should I choose him instead since I’m hoping to secure an A for micro (with my efforts as well)!
Manfred took me for intro to econs for bridging and I didn't rly understand (maybe bc my econs weak) his method of teaching. Altho he is very straight forward and detailed, I don't rly like when he go off subject and talk about some stories or some jokes.... then when I ask him questions like during break/after class he won't help. Like he thinks I should know so he won't entertain my questions. So from there I was struggling with econs since nobody to ask for help from.
And also Manfred teaches his way, he isn't as in depth as other for example Sovan. So if the exam comes up with a very different question from the PYP, if under Manfred's teaching you may not be able to do the question. Whereas if you took Sovan, who makes you understands econs and even if the question ask in any form, you will be able to answer.
Not sure if you get what I'm trying to say, and so that's why I decide to go for Andy instead of Manfred (IF I'm able to find his schedule). This is my personal opinion, best is if you go attend both lecturer's class and see which you are able to understand better.