HWZ Forums

Login Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

[BREAKING] SPH Chinese Media Group APOLOGISE to Mr Quah

Like Tree31Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 13-05-2020, 03:46 PM   #1
Great Supremacy Member
 
s-ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 70,587
[BREAKING] SPH Chinese Media Group APOLOGISE to Mr Quah

Open letter to readers concerning news article "NTU Student perplexed at how he contracted COVID virus"
Lianhe Wanbao published an article on 7 May, titled "NTU Student perplexed at how he contracted COVID virus despite not having left the house during circuit breaker period". The content of the article was later refuted by Mr Quah Zheng Jie, the subject of the article, in his social media post.

As zaobao.sg carries the content of SPH's three Chinese news dailies, readers and the public alike assumed that the article was carried in Lianhe Zaobao, which was not the case.

Firstly, let me explain the rationale for reporting this story.

Our reporter had worked on this story since mid-April, during the circuit breaker period. At that time, there remained a number of COVID cases in the community that could not be traced. This was a concern to our readers, and therefore became a focus of our reporting. Our reporter, who is acquainted with Mr Quah, saw his Instagram post which read: "If by the end of the few stories and you still don't get it I got the covid even I stayed home".

Our reporter contacted Mr Quah via IG and struck up a conversation. When our reporter made it clear that he was a journalist and requested an interview with Mr Quah, Mr Quah turned down the request.

Notwithstanding the unwillingness of Mr Quah to be interviewed, our reporter used the wrong method to report on the story, by framing the article as an interview when it was actually written based on Mr Quah's IG posts and his personal understanding of Mr Quah. He did not inform his immediate supervisor that he had not obtained Mr Quah's consent for the interview.

The newsroom has in place strict protocols and procedures to ensure that our news reporting standards are upheld. In this instance, the reporter had not followed the procedures and protocols expected of all our journalists. As Mr Quah had declined to be interviewed, the reporter could still have written the article, making reference to the facts publicly available, e.g. public social media posts, but should not portray it as an interview piece.

In addition, Mr Quah's family circumstances and surname were changed in an attempt to obscure the real identity of Mr Quah. No permission was granted to do so and the reporter also did not indicate, as our protocol requires, that an alias was used to protect the identity of the newsmaker. These actions also constituted a deviation from our protocols.

On 7 May 2020, Mr Quah took to social media accusing our reporter for behaving unethically. He followed up with an email to our newsroom on 8 May 2020. The newsroom management took his accusations seriously, and after confirming that the reporter in question did not interview Mr Quah, we replied to Mr Quah saying that "we have taken down the report from our website and social media after an internal investigation".

We further explained to Mr Quah that the reporter had written the story based on Mr Quah's social media posts, and that the reporter "had made a mistake and a wrong judgement to mention in the article that you were interviewed despite the fact that you said you were not willing to. We apologise for the wrong attribution and the inconvenience caused".

On Sunday 10 May, Mr Quah posted an article on his facebook page: "National Newspaper fabricates interview based on my COVID-19 experience".

The article accused Lianhe Zaobao of fabricating his experience and alleged that, "This is misleading because it suggests and perpetuates the idea that people can get COVID-19 even if they stay home."

This news in fact ran on Lianhe Wanbao and not Lianhe Zaobao. In addition, the story was not fabricated. The details were based on extracts from Mr Quah's social media posts.

The reporter is relatively new to the job, having just joined the newsroom two months ago. In his second email to the newsroom on 11 May, Mr Quah urged the newsroom to consider dismissing the reporter. Although the reporter has indeed made a mistake, the reporter has been truthful in admitting his mistake and expressing his remorse for misleading readers and impacting the newspaper's reputation. We need to carefully consider if there are mitigating factors for someone who is just starting off his career.

The company has a disciplinary system in place, and if a reporter or staff is alleged to have violated any protocols or code of conduct, he or she has the right to a proper investigation process and hearing. We have set up an independent disciplinary committee to review the case, and will decide on the penalties to be imposed. SPH, as the employer of the reporter, will take responsibility by addressing the mistake, and take measures to avoid further recurrences.

We sincerely apologise to Mr Quah, as we should not have attributed the story we ran to an interview with him when he expressly declined the interview request. This incident serves as a timely reminder to us, that we should constantly review our working procedures and reiterate to our colleagues the importance of adhering to journalistic principles and processes.

Han Yong May
Editor, NewsHub
SPH Chinese Media Group
13-05-2020

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/znews/sing...box=1589354955
Tanya K. Chin likes this.
s-ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:49 PM   #2
Arch-Supremacy Member
 
jerichoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 21,605
IN FIRST PAGE


ARE THERE OTHER CASES LIKE THIS!?


158 IS REALLY 158


LOL
jerichoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:51 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Kunkka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,017
Waiting for MOH to answer why foreign workers dont count
daylight likes this.
Kunkka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:51 PM   #4
Master Member
 
education's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,745
Jsm, make 158 apologise.
Clapping.gif
ponpokku and niefeng80 like this.
education is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:51 PM   #5
Master Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,932
The guy gg already,career end
whitecabbage is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:54 PM   #6
Supremacy Member
 
yaucs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,813
My England no good, so case closed?

Sent from somewhere using GAGT
yaucs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:54 PM   #7
High Supremacy Member
 
starry_starry_night's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 35,862
Mr Quah can sleep well already!
starry_starry_night is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:54 PM   #8
Supremacy Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,162
They apologise. Need to frame up sia.
furyoo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:54 PM   #9
High Honorary Member
 
addict951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 152,643
The ginnapis reporter over-zealous liao la.


Btw, should also reveal the name of the reporter. The entire apology 一直 Mr Quah Mr Quah, macam scare the public dun know the victim rike that.
__________________
HWZ's 2nd Honorary Member on Jan 28 2009
addict951 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:54 PM   #10
Great Supremacy Member
 
leaving_footsteps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 56,307
Aiya. Live and let live. Apologized liao. What more you want wor?
__________________
I can get you your answer but what is the point behind the question?
leaving_footsteps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:55 PM   #11
High Supremacy Member
 
ballastic90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 42,754
Can sleep well liao
ballastic90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:55 PM   #12
High Honorary Member
 
radish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 176,942
its quite defensive i dont dont see its really an apology more like a justification. and as usual the mistake is always the most junior guy. in the first place the editor reviewed and approved for publish isnt it.
peterpark3r likes this.
__________________
I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes.
radish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:55 PM   #13
High Supremacy Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 37,526
he is the only guy in NTU tio virus, so its easy to csi him
daylight is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:55 PM   #14
Master Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 3,947
Wall of text. The journalist should be sacked. Period.
crazycardriver is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13-05-2020, 03:55 PM   #15
High Supremacy Member
 
starmerck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 32,467
Open letter to readers concerning news article "NTU Student perplexed at how he contracted COVID virus"
Lianhe Wanbao published an article on 7 May, titled "NTU Student perplexed at how he contracted COVID virus despite not having left the house during circuit breaker period". The content of the article was later refuted by Mr Quah Zheng Jie, the subject of the article, in his social media post.

As zaobao.sg carries the content of SPH's three Chinese news dailies, readers and the public alike assumed that the article was carried in Lianhe Zaobao, which was not the case.

Firstly, let me explain the rationale for reporting this story.

Our reporter had worked on this story since mid-April, during the circuit breaker period. At that time, there remained a number of COVID cases in the community that could not be traced. This was a concern to our readers, and therefore became a focus of our reporting. Our reporter, who is acquainted with Mr Quah, saw his Instagram post which read: "If by the end of the few stories and you still don't get it I got the covid even I stayed home".

Our reporter contacted Mr Quah via IG and struck up a conversation. When our reporter made it clear that he was a journalist and requested an interview with Mr Quah, Mr Quah turned down the request.

Notwithstanding the unwillingness of Mr Quah to be interviewed, our reporter used the wrong method to report on the story, by framing the article as an interview when it was actually written based on Mr Quah's IG posts and his personal understanding of Mr Quah. He did not inform his immediate supervisor that he had not obtained Mr Quah's consent for the interview.

The newsroom has in place strict protocols and procedures to ensure that our news reporting standards are upheld. In this instance, the reporter had not followed the procedures and protocols expected of all our journalists. As Mr Quah had declined to be interviewed, the reporter could still have written the article, making reference to the facts publicly available, e.g. public social media posts, but should not portray it as an interview piece.

In addition, Mr Quah's family circumstances and surname were changed in an attempt to obscure the real identity of Mr Quah. No permission was granted to do so and the reporter also did not indicate, as our protocol requires, that an alias was used to protect the identity of the newsmaker. These actions also constituted a deviation from our protocols.

On 7 May 2020, Mr Quah took to social media accusing our reporter for behaving unethically. He followed up with an email to our newsroom on 8 May 2020. The newsroom management took his accusations seriously, and after confirming that the reporter in question did not interview Mr Quah, we replied to Mr Quah saying that "we have taken down the report from our website and social media after an internal investigation".

We further explained to Mr Quah that the reporter had written the story based on Mr Quah's social media posts, and that the reporter "had made a mistake and a wrong judgement to mention in the article that you were interviewed despite the fact that you said you were not willing to. We apologise for the wrong attribution and the inconvenience caused".

On Sunday 10 May, Mr Quah posted an article on his facebook page: "National Newspaper fabricates interview based on my COVID-19 experience".

The article accused Lianhe Zaobao of fabricating his experience and alleged that, "This is misleading because it suggests and perpetuates the idea that people can get COVID-19 even if they stay home."

This news in fact ran on Lianhe Wanbao and not Lianhe Zaobao. In addition, the story was not fabricated. The details were based on extracts from Mr Quah's social media posts.

The reporter is relatively new to the job, having just joined the newsroom two months ago. In his second email to the newsroom on 11 May, Mr Quah urged the newsroom to consider dismissing the reporter. Although the reporter has indeed made a mistake, the reporter has been truthful in admitting his mistake and expressing his remorse for misleading readers and impacting the newspaper's reputation. We need to carefully consider if there are mitigating factors for someone who is just starting off his career.

The company has a disciplinary system in place, and if a reporter or staff is alleged to have violated any protocols or code of conduct, he or she has the right to a proper investigation process and hearing. We have set up an independent disciplinary committee to review the case, and will decide on the penalties to be imposed. SPH, as the employer of the reporter, will take responsibility by addressing the mistake, and take measures to avoid further recurrences.

We sincerely apologise to Mr Quah, as we should not have attributed the story we ran to an interview with him when he expressly declined the interview request. This incident serves as a timely reminder to us, that we should constantly review our working procedures and reiterate to our colleagues the importance of adhering to journalistic principles and processes.

Han Yong May
Editor, NewsHub
SPH Chinese Media Group
13-05-2020

https://www.zaobao.com.sg/znews/sing...box=1589354955
158 will increase in Freedom of Press rankings to 154 next year?

Since 158 apologies wor
starmerck is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Terms of Service for more information.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On