moi ish didn’t know there ish anything rong with pale wrinkle sparse hairPale wrinkled with sparse hair shot
]https://i.imgur.com/gO2RAa6.jpg[/img]
Bro... ppl r buying 1680 at 11-13K USD now!
You could trump ur friend in % returns..
If u had a little bit more patience
May I know what functional use has it got for you?
To me, zero, useless. Waste of effort.
And how is that noob when it not functional to me?
Mai cock leh. Don't force it down on me that if it's functional to you then it must be functional for everyone. Everyone MUST loves AR.
MUST know the scientific terms of every single compounds or methods of AR.
If it's not, noooooooooooob
Lol joker
It's very much okay for me. I can stand on my own two legs thank you very much.chiu better prepare before his mob of supporters put chiu down...here chiu cant haf different opinion than tis ill mannered nut otherwise rike mad dog bite chiu no let go
moi ish didn’t know there ish anything rong with pale wrinkle sparse hair
ish it peepur gorilla dark smooth and hairy af?
First, someone said the external AR on tool watches is useless.Some days this place quite sian. Full of clowns and NASA qualified spacemen lording it over everyone
First, someone said the external AR on tool watches is useless.
I came in to say that, no, there is a use for them.
Bam, it becomes I'm possibly the AR inventor, having conflict of interests, and that someone insisting that I'm forcing everyone to love AR coatings. Now I'm a clown.
It's alright. It's better to be a clown who knows something anyway, than a wannabe who knows nothing yet takes pride in his ignorance.
Edit: The English comprehension of some here is simply... egregious. This is GP 101, someone makes a blanket statement, and every single JC student is supposed to know that it is untenable, and the standard response is to come up with a counter-example. While I might not have provided for a direct example, it is a curious matter that some view the bearer of news and technical expertise as being the overbearing one.
I'm not specifically NASA qualified, but I've worked on NASA projects before and now I work closely with colleagues who work on space-qualified hardware.I'm pretty sure the clown refers to the idiot with the broken english, but i'm not sure if you are the NASA qualified spacemen though?
I'm not specifically NASA qualified, but I've worked on NASA projects before and now I work closely with colleagues who work on space-qualified hardware.
First, someone said the external AR on tool watches is useless.
I came in to say that, no, there is a use for them.
Bam, it becomes I'm possibly the AR inventor, having conflict of interests, and that someone insisting that I'm forcing everyone to love AR coatings. Now I'm a clown.
It's alright. It's better to be a clown who knows something anyway, than a wannabe who knows nothing yet takes pride in his ignorance.
Edit: The English comprehension of some here is simply... egregious. This is GP 101, someone makes a blanket statement, and every single JC student is supposed to know that it is untenable, and the standard response is to come up with a counter-example. While I might not have provided for a direct example, it is a curious matter that some view the bearer of news and technical expertise as being the overbearing one.
"Tool watch having external AR is useless."
It may have been useless to you, but that's not useless. I was just pointing out that there are superior AR coating technologies around, of which you are oblivious, and that there's a group of niche users who needs the AR to be on both sides.
Just like dive bezels, or inner soft iron cage, or NASA space qualifications, they serve a very specific purpose. Then now I have jokers telling me that nah, because of aesthetics I don't want to have it. They are built for a purpose, if you don't like them, no one is forcing you to get it. Don't whine so much.
TL;DR: We need it, we get it. You don't like it, too bad.
Also, English lesson here: When you have no need for something, but that something serves an external purpose that is known to you, that is not considered useless. A misapplication of "useless" would be: gaoxing84 is useless because I don't buy new Rolexes above retail price.
I would like to add something:
Horology is about the hard work that's put into designing a watch. Besides the design itself, hand-finishing, technical construction and materials research all go into the execution of a watch.
It is perhaps a pity that there is a paucity of coverage on most watch blogs on the technical discussion of the interaction of different watch components. I agree it may have been a difficult and boring subject to most, but compare this with the fervor of passionate vintage car lovers (the different types of cylinder design etc).
Behind the use of better materials (thermal invariance, magnetic susceptibility, elasticity etc), there is a lot of scientific and engineering input that is just as important as aesthetics.
To appreciate a watch is to acknowledge the watch in whole.
I would like to add something:
Horology is about the hard work that's put into designing a watch. Besides the design itself, hand-finishing, technical construction and materials research all go into the execution of a watch.
It is perhaps a pity that there is a paucity of coverage on most watch blogs on the technical discussion of the interaction of different watch components. I agree it may have been a difficult and boring subject to most, but compare this with the fervor of passionate vintage car lovers (the different types of cylinder design etc).
Behind the use of better materials (thermal invariance, magnetic susceptibility, elasticity etc), there is a lot of scientific and engineering input that is just as important as aesthetics.
To appreciate a watch is to acknowledge the watch in whole.
It's okay don't be insecure please.Satki. Engineer, then AR inventer, then English lecturer then suddenly spaceman.
Why you butt hurt sia?
It's useless to me. Serve no purpose to me.
If your English is damn Satki, then do you understand the meaning "to me"?
I clarified many times, what's your ***** problem?
Lol funny leh.
You can share knowledge, good for everyone.
But don't need to flaunt it and throw jargon around.
Annoying af
It's okay don't be insecure please.
Mea culpa, I usually only speak to my intellectual peers. Pardon my inexperience.
Well, you're entitled to your views.First, someone said the external AR on tool watches is useless.
I came in to say that, no, there is a use for them.
Bam, it becomes I'm possibly the AR inventor, having conflict of interests, and that someone insisting that I'm forcing everyone to love AR coatings. Now I'm a clown.
It's alright. It's better to be a clown who knows something anyway, than a wannabe who knows nothing yet takes pride in his ignorance.
Edit: The English comprehension of some here is simply... egregious. This is GP 101, someone makes a blanket statement, and every single JC student is supposed to know that it is untenable, and the standard response is to come up with a counter-example. While I might not have provided for a direct example, it is a curious matter that some view the bearer of news and technical expertise as being the overbearing one.