First AMD Ryzen 7 1700X benchmarks are here

[ondooy]

https://videocardz.com/65825/first-amd-ryzen-7-1700x-benchmarks-are-here

It’s worth noting that Turbo mode for Ryzen CPU is currently disabled (or undetected), so the performance could still theoretically increase. The Ryzen 7 model that was used for this test has a base clock of 3400 MHz. Judging from what we know so far, this means Ryzen 7 1700X, so it is not the fastest Ryzen model out there.

What’s also quite interesting is the fact that Ryzen 7 CPU was tested on .. MSI A320 motherboard, which looks like this. This is an entry-level AM4 motherboard, so we don’t know how did that affect performance, maybe that’s why Turbo mode was undetected in the first place.

Finally the last important thing to note are memory timings (17-17-17-39 2T) @ 2400 MHz. This also could’ve negatively affected the performance, as those timings are not very good.

 

[haylui]

If the performance vs retail selling price is true then it is very attractive.

 

[yusoffb01]

So a 6 core 12 threads intel processor from 2016 beat AMD 8 core 16 thread processor.

 

[manyu882]

Finally the last important thing to note are memory timings (17-17-17-39 2T) @ 2400 MHz. This also could’ve negatively affected the performance, as those timings are not very good.

Anyone knows what memory timing is good for Ryzen.

 

[IcYFl4mEz]

So amd fail again? I can go ahead n buy the 7tg gen cpu liao? Hmm

 

[ragnarok95]

So amd fail again? I can go ahead n buy the 7tg gen cpu liao? Hmm

Out of the 6 tests, 7700K lose 5 and only win 1.

 

[haylui]

So amd fail again? I can go ahead n buy the 7tg gen cpu liao? Hmm

Can la. Your choice ma.

 

[raysusan]

So amd fail again? I can go ahead n buy the 7tg gen cpu liao? Hmm

I don't think so

 

[MacClipper]

Out of the 6 tests, 7700K lose 5 and only win 1.

For some, 7700K again win.

See only what you want to see.

 

[exodiver]

As long their 8 core can touch the lower end of 8 core haswell xeon can Liao.....

Newer xeon cpu+mono are overpriced unless it is the es version.....

 

[Entry Level PC]

tan gu gu for actual gaming benchmarks.

 

[Crimson_FURY]

For some, 7700K again win.

See only what you want to see.

Not really a fair fight comparing to 4 core 7700K in CPU benchmarks. compare to 8 core intels makes more sense with just cpu benchmarks. Though i would like to see how it compares in gaming benchmarks to 7700K

 

[killer]

Unless its price significantly less than its intel counterpart or far less battery comsumption, it will be tough to gain much traction. This isn't like in the days of K7. For most people, processor tech is already at good enough. Many people don't have desktop anymore, and for most people battery life is more important than performance beyond a certain level when using a laptop. Also it will depend on laptop makers to push amd inside, which I don't see happening unless amd provide superior margins

 

[exodiver]

Unless its price significantly less than its intel counterpart or far less battery comsumption, it will be tough to gain much traction. This isn't like in the days of K7. For most people, processor tech is already at good enough. Many people don't have desktop anymore, and for most people battery life is more important than performance beyond a certain level when using a laptop. Also it will depend on laptop makers to push amd inside, which I don't see happening unless amd provide superior margins

Well, the new amd chip is good news for ppl who are into building home virtualization labs....

No longer we have to go all the way back to 6-7 yrs old xeon chip or even es chip.

 

[darkarn]

Well, the new amd chip is good news for ppl who are into building home virtualization labs....

No longer we have to go all the way back to 6-7 yrs old xeon chip or even es chip.

I hope this is the case

This reminds me of that guy who created ESXi hosts using Opterons; so powerful that can host two gaming computers and many other VMs

 

[Elijahonli]

i think for most consumers that are using it to game, the core count doesnt matter actually....

u give me 10 core, 20 core, as long its cheaper or similar price to a intel 4C/8thread cpu and
performs about the same or better, thats all that matters ?

 

[watzup_ken]

Not really a fair fight comparing to 4 core 7700K in CPU benchmarks. compare to 8 core intels makes more sense with just cpu benchmarks. Though i would like to see how it compares in gaming benchmarks to 7700K

It is not a fair fight to compare 8 vs 4 cores, but it all boils down to which is of better value. Intel have limited consumers to 4 core chips for a very long time by charging substantially more for their 6 and 8 core solutions. Even the mobo supporting these Intel 6 and 8 core chips cost more than their mainstream parts. Therefore, if AMD is capable of delivering higher core count solution that is highly competitive to Intel's solution, it is a win for consumers.

At this point, I believe most games are optimized for quad cores with higher clockspeed since quad core processors are the most common. Eventually, games may start optimizing for higher core count.

 

[kimsix]

This is my 5960X at 4.5ghz vs Ryzen at 3.4Ghz scores with same Sisoft version. Aggregate upwards using 1.323 multiplier. Ryzen 1700 should beat 7700K easily and the price is at USD320, AMD is back!

http://ranker.sisoftware.net/show_run.php?q=c2ffcee889e8d5e3d4e0d0e8d1f785b888aecbae93a385f6cbfb

 

[LonelyMan]

Exciting time for AMD and consumers. Pray hard AMD pulls off a few OEM design wins as well in Apple, HP, Lenovo and Asus etc.

 

[longsiew]

Me only interested in gaming benchmark....but I got a hunch that GPU still most significant in gaming........