seowweekeong
Junior Member
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2010
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
Please add me into the chatgroup. Thanks.
LineID : seowweekeong
LineID : seowweekeong
HELLO ACTIVE PLAYER PLEASE ADD ME TO THE TSUM GROUP !!!
Line id: hihihihihihihihihiii
hi,any forum members can gif me the link for auto sending of hearts? and do we need to download the bluestack in order to use it?
hi,plz add me in group chat at genie ong ..will send hearts often.
Wah I never notice increasing MyTsum requirements for Sully.When we connect string after string of Tsum Tsums at high speeds it sometimes takes the game a few seconds to "catch up" and "refill" the screen with Tsum Tsums so we can go on connecting them again. One way to avoid this wait and save precious seconds is to pop any bubble after making several combos of long chains and cause the game to instantly (almost) refill the screen again.
Sulley, at skill level 5, creates four big Sulleys each time he is activated. It usually takes 19 small Sulleys to activate his power, but when you have four big ones, it means that each time you activate his ability you instantly get four more to connect and thus activate him again.
The problem with this is that the game takes 2 to 3 seconds to "count" the 20+ Sulleys (each big Tsum Tsum is equal to 5 small ones) before refilling the screen and making his skill available again. To avoid this wait, one can just tap on any magic bubbles on the screen to quickly settle the count, refill the screen and reactivate his skill.
The issue I've been experiencing is that when I use this "trick" to activate his ability repeatedly at a rapid pace, the number of Sulley Tsum Tsums needed to prime his skill for use goes up, from an initial 19 to 20+ and eventually 30+. This increase usually happens after the 5th or 6th use of his power with the bubble speed up but doesn't manifest itself if I just allow it to settle and refill at its own pace.
Has anybody else experienced this? Is this some bug with Sulley? I do almost the same thing with Eeyore but have never seen this happening.
![]()
![]()