WuRenJi
Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2018
- Messages
- 6,671
- Reaction score
- 724
Both using Singtel data to test. No comparison on Simba Vs Singtel.
Can only say Singtel is unstable?
Both using Singtel data to test. No comparison on Simba Vs Singtel.
Huge differences in speed sia, meaning that downloading and uploading of data connection are much faster thus apps run faster and smooth.
Using apple too but install all Google app, hated the double app on phone though, like what android used to be. And the charging cable, urrggg no USB C.Buy Apple phones to save money.
Apple to apple comparison Simba lost in all aspect.Huge differences in speed sia, meaning that downloading and uploading of data connection are much faster thus apps run faster and smooth.
Both same same $10. Which one would you go for?
Just whack. For me i do online than came back fr boleh land open letter box sim card waiting for me to activate. U go personally collect need pay 5sgd. Gd luck in your porting over.thank you so much for your feedback guys! looks like i'm porting over to Simba!
Which one is Zym & SIMBA?Both using Singtel data to test. No comparison on Simba Vs Singtel.
Can only say Singtel is unstable?![]()
Self collection has a fee of $5? - didn't read this anywhere.Just whack. For me i do online than came back fr boleh land open letter box sim card waiting for me to activate. U go personally collect need pay 5sgd. Gd luck in your porting over.Pls update abit if u free
Life is v short. Ai song song kao tuas & Changi.
Thing is, Google cannot make good hardware. My house 2 pixel phone, no one want to use liao. And want to sell also no value.
IMHO.Thing is, Google cannot make good hardware. My house 2 pixel phone, no one want to use liao. And want to sell also no value.
obviously, Singtel is the one with the faster speed...dunno why it's showing both as singtel.Which one is Zym & SIMBA?
I only see Singtel
Semantically, Google does make the hardware.IMHO.
I think should be Google don't make hardware.![]()
IMHO.Semantically, Google does make the hardware.
Previously, I recall HTC and LG making many of their Nexus and Pixel phones. It should all be Foxconn now - but Foxconn is a 3rd party manufacturer who makes for many brands including Apple, Huawei, Sony, HMD (which Nokia falls under), Xiaomi, etc... However, I recall Google acquired HTC, so it should be the HTC team doing the designing in-house then outsourcing to Foxconn for the actual manufacture.
https://techcrunch.com/2018/01/29/google-htc/
Yep. But Google still is in the hardware business, only because of HTC. And HTC has never made fantastic QC phones. Their phones were okay, but not brilliant in terms of QC. I still remember my TyTN II fondly. It was built like a brick, but it still had issues with its build and QC.IMHO.
I would say Google still have a long way to go to be like Apple.
Contract manufacturers usually just manufacture, good or bad your design, I doubt they care.
Contract manufacturing with design is price vs performance.
Just like donkey years back, Lucky Goldstar manufacture some of Apple monitors. They are good because of Apple stringent QC.
IMHO.Yep. But Google still is in the hardware business, only because of HTC. And HTC has never made fantastic QC phones. Their phones were okay, but not brilliant in terms of QC. I still remember my TyTN II fondly. It was built like a brick, but it still had issues with its build and QC.
You're right about contract manufacturers not caring - it's not their job.
Frankly, I doubt Google cares about its phones tho. I feel the Pixel, while decent, remains lower priority for them. Google is a software company after all - their hardware offerings were never that great.
I still like my Pxel 4a and 6a though. FWIW, what I do enjoy is that I don't have copies of many apps. My biggest gripe is that 3rd party Android phones always have bloatware in their own duplicated apps - Phone, Messages, Calendar, Contacts, Camera, Photo Gallery, etc....IMHO.
I look at the person who heads the hardware and roughly gives myself the idea where things will lead.
Even now, Google needs Samsung because people see Apple vs Samsung and not IOS vs Android.
If no need, why bothered by TizenOS.
I recently ventured into plain Android OS... find it a bit illogical to use vs Samsung OneUI ... perhaps it is me.
Still looking for compelling reasons to get Google.
But Google Home is great.
IMHO.I still like my Pxel 4a and 6a though. FWIW, what I do enjoy is that I don't have copies of many apps. My biggest gripe is that 3rd party Android phones always have bloatware in their own duplicated apps - Phone, Messages, Calendar, Contacts, Camera, Photo Gallery, etc....
Noted. So no one can talk about phones on the network, but can only talk about network. Got it.Guys, stick to topic of Simba la..
IMHO. My apologies. Peace.Guys, stick to topic of Simba la..