I already mentioned earlier in this thread:
Capgemini's World Weath Report defines
High Net Worth as $1m investible assets, and excludes value of your residence, similar definition can be found in investopedia:
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/h/hnwi.asp
Knight Frank Wealth report defines
High Net Worth to include value of residence (they are a property company after all).
There are some who think there is only one right answer, either Capgemini is right or Knight Frank is right, the other
must be wrong.
My world is not black and white. My view is both are free to use which definition they choose, as long as they make it clear. I really don't get this '
I am right, therefore you must be wrong' mindset.
So if someone has set themselves a target of achieving VHNW status (it really is up to them), they are free to measure their investible assets only and exclude their residence value.