Fastest ISP?

bert64

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2020
Messages
1,027
Reaction score
539
Easy to say settlement free peering, but how many local companies in SG have the backbone and capacity to 1:1 peer with Singtel? Thats why you only see the Tier1 ISPs or large CDNs having this arrangement with Singtel. Unfortunately at the end of the day, it is a business not a charity. If not happy with Singtel's quality, can always change to another ISP to serve your needs.
Other ISPs are businesses too, it all depends on the business model...

If your business model is primarily to provide connectivity to your customers, then settlement free peering is what you want because it improves the service as well as reducing costs.

If your primary business model is to sell peering then you don't want settlement free peering. Your customers paying for connectivity are effectively being used as a product which is sold to your peering customers.

The other providers all have open peering arrangements on SGIX, so they are prioritising the service being provided to their existing paying customers, and not trying to open a second revenue stream at the expense of existing customers.

This only works because most of the customers are unaware of this customer-hostile model, and the fact that it provides an inferior service to them. It also seems to be rather specific to singtel as large isps in other countries (including MUCH larger ones like comcast etc) do have settlement free peering.
 

xiaofan

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
31,770
Reaction score
9,078
Everyone and anyone can claim they are fastest...

fastest can be highest bandwidth during speedtest with their own server :s13:
or to me, fastest means lowest latency to destination

Just discovered this website (pretty much china focus but test the rest of the world as well)

Come test and show us your result - https://tools.ipip.net/newping.php

Here's moi result based on my home router IP

3kpJVuJ.png

Results on 3-Feb-2024
MR and Singtel seem to be good. M1 and VQ seem to be bad. Starhub may be good based on MR result. Not so sure about SIMBA.

Here is my result -- Singtel 1Gbps plan. Tested using the Asus RT-AX86U router using IPv4.

hhhUNLy.png

Here is my other homenetwork using OpenWRT, Singtel 1Gbps plan.

The China results are almost comparable to the above result if we just look at the colours.
Two worse results: HeiLongJIang and Taiwan
One better result: SiChuan.

gnusvzE.png

Rereun the test again, Singtel 5Gbps, IPv4, WiFi 7 connection to Asus TUF-BE6500 (lazy to use wired). The results are more or less the same as previous Singtel 1Gbps.
https://tools.ipip.net/newping.php

kijT2HP.png
 
Last edited:

xiaofan

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
31,770
Reaction score
9,078
M1 500Mbps
Ping to my 2nd hop
3fWj6FG.png

区域最快/最慢平均
全网新加坡(Zeofast) 1.0ms/瑞典哈兰省法尔肯贝里市(glesys.se) 1311.6ms215.1ms
移动山东滨州(联通) 189.4ms/辽宁沈阳LM2(移动) 495.9ms434.0ms
联通山东青岛(联通云) 71.8ms/安徽滁州(电信) 383.3ms246.9ms
电信福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 56.3ms/陕西西安(移动云) 516.8ms359.6ms
华南广东湛江(联通云) 249.9ms / 广西南宁(电信) 455.2ms344.1ms
华北北京(阿里云) 214.3ms / 内蒙古呼和浩特(移动云) 488.8ms335.9ms
华东福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 56.3ms / 江苏盐城(移动) 486.1ms324.4ms
华中河南郑州(联通云) 204.5ms / 湖北襄阳(移动云) 479.8ms327.7ms
东北辽宁沈阳(联通云一区) 186.5ms / 辽宁沈阳LM2(移动) 495.9ms339.1ms
西北宁夏银川(联通云) 262.5ms / 陕西西安(移动云) 516.8ms356.1ms
西南重庆(联通) 96.2ms / 云南昆明(移动云) 464.6ms360.2ms
港澳台香港(zeofast) 32.2ms / 台湾台北市(ZENLAYER-TPE2) 199.3ms64.7ms
亚洲新加坡(Zeofast) 1.0ms/哈萨克斯坦阿拉木图(ishosting.com) 610.6ms75.6ms
欧洲法国普罗旺斯-阿尔卑斯-蓝色海岸大区马赛(ZENLAYER-MRS1) 138.3ms/瑞典哈兰省法尔肯贝里市(glesys.se) 1311.6ms215.1ms
非洲南非约翰内斯堡(misaka.io) 116.8ms/尼日利亚拉各斯 427.5ms296.1ms
北美洲美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶(linode) 161.8ms/美国佛罗里达州迈阿密(linode) 477.0ms213.9ms
南美洲波多黎各圣胡安(oneprovider.com) 267.0ms/巴西圣保罗(VULTR) 592.1ms333.3ms
大洋洲澳大利亚西澳大利亚州珀斯 47.6ms/澳大利亚新南威尔士州悉尼(linode) 237.8ms102.9ms

Tabulated results for @cyberet

The above results were from @Mach3.2 on 3-Feb-2024 (M1 second hop).

Just did the test again with the same M1 IP 175.156.64.1 today (13-Oct-2025).

Looks like M1 is still very bad to China.

MWuEo9g.png


区域最快/最慢平均
全网新加坡(GCP) 0.9ms/巴西维涅杜(oracle.com) 658.9ms205.9ms
移动江苏南京(移动) 184.2ms/广东广州(移动) 476.3ms232.2ms
联通香港(联通云) 37.3ms/河北石家庄(联通-xf) 475.0ms360.3ms
电信陕西西安(移动云) 206.8ms/西藏拉萨(天翼云) 436.9ms276.1ms
华南广东广州(移动) 191.0ms / 广东广州(移动) 476.3ms332.4ms
华北山西晋中(天翼云) 214.4ms / 河北石家庄(联通-xf) 475.0ms287.0ms
华东江苏南京(移动) 184.2ms / 江苏宿迁(移动) 457.5ms290.5ms
华中湖南长沙(移动云) 207.3ms / 湖南湘潭(联通云) 399.1ms308.5ms
东北辽宁沈阳(移动云) 217.8ms / 黑龙江大兴安岭(联通云) 382.6ms282.5ms
西北陕西西安(移动云) 206.8ms / 新疆和田地区(联通云) 430.6ms313.9ms
西南贵州贵阳(移动-xf) 205.6ms / 西藏拉萨(天翼云) 436.9ms308.1ms
港澳台中国香港(dogyun) 29.8ms / 香港(腾讯云) 175.6ms56.4ms
亚洲新加坡(GCP) 0.9ms/哈萨克斯坦阿斯塔纳(ps.kz) 331.5ms75.9ms
欧洲俄罗斯哈巴罗夫斯克边疆区哈巴罗夫斯克/伯力(misaka.io) 101.4ms/荷兰北荷兰省阿姆斯特丹(DIGITALOCEAN-AMS2) 532.3ms192.4ms
非洲南非约翰内斯堡(VULTR) 116.1ms/南非约翰内斯堡(gcorelabs) 530.7ms276.6ms
北美洲美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶(zenlayer.com) 161.1ms/美国加利福尼亚州圣何塞(oracle.com) 543.5ms218.1ms
南美洲危地马拉危地马拉省危地马拉市(oneprovider.com) 245.1ms/巴西维涅杜(oracle.com) 658.9ms332.8ms
大洋洲澳大利亚西澳大利亚州珀斯 48.7ms/新西兰奥克兰大区奥克兰(the.hosting) 228.8ms109.0ms
 
Last edited:

xiaofan

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
31,770
Reaction score
9,078
simba gateway- 210.10.78.1
end user (at home) should be 2 to 3ms more at least

KxbbAUW.png



区域最快/最慢平均
全网新加坡(AMAZON-LIGHTSAIL) 0.7ms/印度尼西亚雅加达(阿里云) 532.1ms218.7ms
移动山东济南(移动云) 336.7ms/云南昆明(移动云) 437.3ms400.8ms
联通广东广州(联通云一区) 307.5ms/新疆和田(联通云) 427.1ms353.3ms
电信福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 56.7ms/陕西西安(移动云) 507.6ms379.6ms
华南广东广州(联通云一区) 307.5ms / 海南三亚(电信) 422.0ms364.2ms
华北北京(百度云) 307.6ms / 山西太原(天翼云) 408.6ms358.2ms
华东福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 56.7ms / 福建福州(移动-云端) 438.3ms369.4ms
华中湖北武汉(联通云) 322.3ms / 湖北咸宁(电信) 433.2ms365.6ms
东北黑龙江哈尔滨(天翼云) 343.8ms / 辽宁沈阳(移动云) 444.3ms380.9ms
西北青海西宁(联通云) 344.7ms / 陕西西安(移动云) 507.6ms389.8ms
西南贵州贵阳(联通) 334.5ms / 四川成都(阿里云) 465.0ms395.2ms
港澳台香港(腾讯云-轻量) 33.2ms / 香港(无忧云) 330.5ms86.5ms
亚洲新加坡(AMAZON-LIGHTSAIL) 0.7ms/印度尼西亚雅加达(阿里云) 532.1ms87.3ms
欧洲法国普罗旺斯-阿尔卑斯-蓝色海岸大区马赛(ZENLAYER-MRS1) 133.7ms/瑞典哈兰省法尔肯贝里市(glesys.se) 394.3ms173.7ms
非洲肯尼亚内罗毕(web4africa.com) 164.7ms/加纳大阿克拉地区阿克拉(web4africa.com) 345.9ms246.1ms
北美洲美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶(GCP) 170.6ms/美国纽约州纽约(DIGITALOCEAN-NYC3) 496.1ms226.4ms
南美洲智利圣地亚哥(GCP) 271.5ms/阿根廷圣菲省罗萨里奥 387.7ms336.8ms
大洋洲澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本(GCP) 86.0ms/澳大利亚南澳大利亚州阿德莱德 265.3ms128.8ms

The above test was done on 3-Feb-2024, for SIMBA gateway 210.10.78.1

Latest result today, 13-Oct-2025.

There seems to be some improvement, especially to China.

4duTa5o.png


区域最快/最慢平均
全网新加坡(misaka.io) 0.6ms/广东广州(联通) 979.1ms216.5ms
移动广东广州(移动云) 47.2ms/陕西西安(移动) 315.4ms129.5ms
联通香港(联通云) 33.4ms/重庆(联通) 427.5ms362.5ms
电信福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 60.3ms/广东广州(联通) 979.1ms344.8ms
华南广东广州(移动云) 47.2ms / 广东广州(联通) 979.1ms342.3ms
华北北京(青云3b) 194.9ms / 河北石家庄(联通云) 364.9ms320.5ms
华东福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 60.3ms / 福建厦门(联通-xf) 410.8ms300.1ms
华中湖南长沙(移动云) 64.0ms / 湖北武汉(联通) 391.3ms317.3ms
东北辽宁沈阳(移动) 94.3ms / 黑龙江大兴安岭(联通云) 388.8ms315.8ms
西北陕西西安(移动云) 92.7ms / 新疆和田地区(联通云) 406.3ms343.2ms
西南贵州贵阳(移动云) 65.0ms / 重庆(联通) 427.5ms305.7ms
港澳台中国香港(dogyun) 30.3ms / 香港(恒创科技) 174.2ms54.4ms
亚洲新加坡(misaka.io) 0.6ms/巴基斯坦信德省卡拉奇(lightnode.com) 379.2ms89.4ms
欧洲法国普罗旺斯-阿尔卑斯-蓝色海岸大区马赛(ouiheberg.com) 136.1ms/土耳其伊斯坦布尔(kapteyan.com.tr) 311.4ms211.8ms
非洲南非约翰内斯堡(ivecloud.co.za) 153.5ms/南非约翰内斯堡(gcorelabs) 404.8ms250.0ms
北美洲美国加利福尼亚州旧金山(DIGITALOCEAN-SFO2) 163.2ms/美国弗吉尼亚州阿什本(oracle.com) 283.8ms215.6ms
南美洲波多黎各圣胡安(oneprovider.com) 257.2ms/巴西维涅杜(oracle.com) 397.3ms332.2ms
大洋洲澳大利亚西澳大利亚州珀斯 47.3ms/新西兰奥克兰大区奥克兰(the.hosting) 224.4ms135.7ms
 

xiaofan

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
31,770
Reaction score
9,078
Whizcomm gateway - 202.133.192.1
end user (at home) should be 2 to 3ms more at least

n1qJP8Z.png



区域最快/最慢平均
全网新加坡(VULTR) 1.7ms/陕西西安(移动云) 1417.4ms225.8ms
移动广东佛山(移动) 63.5ms/天津(移动) 268.6ms134.5ms
联通广东深圳(联通云) 44.7ms/安徽滁州(电信) 346.4ms92.8ms
电信福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 60.5ms/陕西西安(移动云) 1417.4ms360.0ms
华南广东深圳(联通云) 44.7ms / 广西南宁(天翼云) 380.3ms228.5ms
华北天津(联通) 77.9ms / 内蒙古呼和浩特(bgp) 422.9ms244.2ms
华东福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 60.5ms / 江西南昌(电信) 423.3ms209.7ms
华中湖南湘潭(联通云) 71.5ms / 湖北十堰(电信) 397.6ms187.9ms
东北辽宁沈阳(联通云一区) 92.4ms / 辽宁沈阳(天翼云三区) 362.8ms209.2ms
西北宁夏银川(联通云) 90.7ms / 陕西西安(移动云) 1417.4ms353.8ms
西南贵州贵阳(移动云) 84.5ms / 四川成都(阿里云) 463.0ms283.9ms
港澳台香港(CN2) 35.7ms / 台湾台中市(远传电信) 258.1ms73.8ms
亚洲新加坡(VULTR) 1.7ms/阿联酋迪拜酋长国迪拜(AMAZON) 439.8ms97.1ms
欧洲法国法兰西岛大区巴黎(Azure) 151.0ms/瑞典哈兰省法尔肯贝里市(glesys.se) 1353.5ms314.2ms
非洲南非约翰内斯堡(oneprovider.com) 117.3ms/南非约翰内斯堡(华为云) 518.9ms408.0ms
北美洲美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶(GCP) 167.6ms/哥斯达黎加圣何塞省圣何塞(oneprovider.com) 310.5ms222.7ms
南美洲波多黎各圣胡安(oneprovider.com) 269.0ms/阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯(oneprovider.com) 388.7ms340.7ms
大洋洲澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本(ZENLAYER-MEL1) 87.7ms/澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本(VULTR) 254.4ms142.4ms

The above test was done on 3-Feb-2024, for Whizcomm gateway - 202.133.192.1.

Latest result today, 13-Oct-2025.

wng5RKZ.png


区域最快/最慢平均
全网新加坡(VULTR) 2.5ms/重庆(联通云) 1029.6ms209.6ms
移动湖南长沙(移动) 67.1ms/浙江杭州(移动云) 326.5ms181.4ms
联通广东珠海(联通云) 45.4ms/重庆(联通云) 1029.6ms122.2ms
电信福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 65.0ms/河北石家庄(电信-xf) 629.6ms361.1ms
华南广东珠海(联通云) 45.4ms / 海南海口(天翼云三区) 371.4ms211.8ms
华北北京(移动) 89.8ms / 河北石家庄(电信-xf) 629.6ms227.1ms
华东福建厦门(CN2-咕咕云) 65.0ms / 山东青岛(电信-xf) 471.0ms219.3ms
华中湖南长沙(移动) 67.1ms / 湖北襄阳(电信-香香云) 449.6ms200.6ms
东北吉林长春(移动云) 104.1ms / 辽宁沈阳(天翼云三区) 366.8ms259.7ms
西北甘肃兰州(联通云) 75.3ms / 新疆乌鲁木齐(天翼云二十七区) 404.6ms240.8ms
西南贵州贵阳(移动-xf) 86.0ms / 重庆(联通云) 1029.6ms303.8ms
港澳台香港(hostKVM) 35.7ms / 台湾台北市(hostinginside) 132.2ms65.9ms
亚洲新加坡(VULTR) 2.5ms/阿联酋迪拜酋长国迪拜(AMAZON) 492.4ms98.6ms
欧洲俄罗斯哈巴罗夫斯克边疆区哈巴罗夫斯克/伯力(misaka.io) 110.4ms/波兰滨海省格但斯克(oneprovider.com) 410.7ms230.6ms
非洲南非约翰内斯堡(ZENLAYER-JNB1) 170.3ms/南非约翰内斯堡(rackzar.com) 511.3ms386.0ms
北美洲美国华盛顿州昆西(Azure) 166.3ms/美国弗吉尼亚州马纳萨斯(gcorelabs) 341.3ms230.8ms
南美洲波多黎各圣胡安(oneprovider.com) 257.4ms/乌拉圭蒙得维的亚省蒙得维的亚(hostingenlaweb.com) 462.3ms345.8ms
大洋洲澳大利亚维多利亚州墨尔本(Azure) 88.3ms/新西兰奥克兰大区奥克兰(the.hosting) 350.1ms175.9ms
 

xiaofan

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
31,770
Reaction score
9,078

@Mach3.2 will like this test very much.

Your VQ results are quite decent.

Singtel is so so so bad with this test. You can see my test results below, using WiFi (but WiFi should not be the real issue here -- got good connection using RT-AX86U router at 3m distance only.
https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-35860-9cfdc6
2KuX4Ow.png

The above test was done on 15-August-2024.

Now it is 28-Dec-2024. Still using wireless, 4m away from Asus TUF-BE6500. The results look better now.

Singtel ZTE F8648P ONR bridged 10G LAN port --> Intel N100 OpenWRT virtual router --> 2.5G/10G switch --> TUF-BE6500 router --> wireless --> Acer 2021 Laptop running Windows 11 24H2 (Intel Core i5-1135G7 CPU, 16GB/512GB, Intel AX201 WiFi 6 adapter)

Tested twice.
https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-149276-9d03a2
FIhC7QE.png


https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-149283-9af745
BDylW2S.png

Today's results (13-Oct-2025), 9:30pm on a Sunday evening.

Singtel results will always look bad for this test -- probably due to bad peering policy.

Similar wireless setup, just a new laptop.

Singtel ZTE F8648P ONR bridged 10G LAN port --> Intel N100 OpenWRT virtual router --> 2.5G/10G switch --> TUF-BE6500 router --> wireless --> Acer Swift Go 14 2024 Laptop running Windows 11 25H2 (Intel Core Ultra 5 125HCPU, 16GB/1TGB, Intel Killer BE1750 WiFi 7 adapter)

https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-442290-bd2b45
8AOTp71.png
 

ieatcable

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
69
Reaction score
87
The problem with china is they mostly only have settlement free peering in Frankfurt, sometimes LA, and will carry traffic to their own network more freely from those places. But that path is very congested and leads to a lot of packet losses. Most tier 1 networks will choose to route the traffic from SG to Europe even if it sounds crazy it is actually a lot cheaper for them this way

It will be very difficult for our ISPs to offer China direct egress as the pricing for China Mobile transit are quite exorbitant from what I hear. That's why usually you pay a premium (like MR Gamer) for direct china routes. As for how ST can afford to offer this CM SG to China route to all subscribers we can only speculate. Might be an agreement they have with each other.

If you see those sub 150ms pings coming from non-ST or china optimised plans like M1 or SIMBA, those are an exception as some of CM IP blocks are advertised to PCCW, Tata and Lumen in SG and we can use those routes without paying a premium
 

ieatcable

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
69
Reaction score
87
The above results were from @Mach3.2 on 3-Feb-2024 (M1 second hop).

Just did the test again with the same M1 IP 175.156.64.1 today (13-Oct-2025).

Looks like M1 is still very bad to China.

MWuEo9g.png
My IP block (138.75.192.1) has a bit better average :D

pVNbAw6.png


Edit: Very nice looking graph from a VPS provider with CM routes.

TfLTWTc.png
 

ieatcable

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
69
Reaction score
87
Today's results (13-Oct-2025), 9:30pm on a Sunday evening.

Singtel results will always look bad for this test -- probably due to bad peering policy.

Similar wireless setup, just a new laptop.

Singtel ZTE F8648P ONR bridged 10G LAN port --> Intel N100 OpenWRT virtual router --> 2.5G/10G switch --> TUF-BE6500 router --> wireless --> Acer Swift Go 14 2024 Laptop running Windows 11 25H2 (Intel Core Ultra 5 125HCPU, 16GB/1TGB, Intel Killer BE1750 WiFi 7 adapter)

https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-442290-bd2b45
8AOTp71.png

Let me contribute M1. Wireless also.

https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-442802-06bd0d
QSgAjnJ.png


Partial GSL
tlmghYc.png


Partial Hurricane Electric
yOhZg6y.png

Other users of Starhub/MR, Simba, VQ are welcome to share their results from https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/
 
Last edited:

ieatcable

Junior Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2024
Messages
69
Reaction score
87
Today's results (13-Oct-2025), 9:30pm on a Sunday evening.

Singtel results will always look bad for this test -- probably due to bad peering policy.

Similar wireless setup, just a new laptop.

Singtel ZTE F8648P ONR bridged 10G LAN port --> Intel N100 OpenWRT virtual router --> 2.5G/10G switch --> TUF-BE6500 router --> wireless --> Acer Swift Go 14 2024 Laptop running Windows 11 25H2 (Intel Core Ultra 5 125HCPU, 16GB/1TGB, Intel Killer BE1750 WiFi 7 adapter)

https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-442290-bd2b45
8AOTp71.png
Let me contribute M1. Wireless also.

https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/#0-442802-06bd0d
QSgAjnJ.png


Other users of Starhub/MR, Simba, VQ are welcome to share their results from https://www.meter.net/tools/world-ping-test/

What is interesting to me is the top right most SG server which M1 and ST are bad at. Upon digging, I found the server "sgsg-bluevps.metercdn.net" is only homed by Cogent network and nothing else.

Code:
~: mtr -rw sgsg-bluevps.metercdn.net
HOST:                                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  2.|-- 1.x.75.138.unknown.m1.com.sg         0.0%     4    2.9   3.3   2.7   3.9   0.5
  3.|-- 182.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg       0.0%     4    7.3   4.0   2.5   7.3   2.2
  4.|-- 181.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg       0.0%     4    3.1   3.0   2.6   3.3   0.3
  5.|-- 38.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg        0.0%     4    4.0   4.1   3.9   4.2   0.2
  6.|-- 162.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg       0.0%     4    4.5   4.1   3.7   4.5   0.3
  7.|-- sng-b4-link.ip.twelve99.net            0.0%     4    4.6   4.6   4.4   4.8   0.2
  8.|-- sng-b6-link.ip.twelve99.net           25.0%     4    6.5   7.1   6.5   7.4   0.5
  9.|-- tky-b7-link.ip.twelve99.net            0.0%     4  173.1 172.8 172.4 173.1   0.3
 10.|-- lax-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net           0.0%     4  170.7 170.4 170.1 170.7   0.3
 11.|-- lax-b22-link.ip.twelve99.net           0.0%     4  170.6 170.3 169.9 170.6   0.4
 12.|-- lax-bb2-link.ip.twelve99.net           0.0%     4  170.3 170.2 170.0 170.4   0.2
 13.|-- lax-b22-link.ip.twelve99.net          75.0%     4  170.4 170.4 170.4 170.4   0.0
 14.|-- cogent-ic-352552.ip.twelve99-cust.net  0.0%     4  171.3 170.5 170.0 171.3   0.5
 15.|-- be9040.ccr81.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com  0.0%     4  172.5 172.1 171.1 172.7   0.7
 16.|-- be8752.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com  0.0%     4  171.2 171.2 170.9 171.5   0.3
 17.|-- 154.18.35.201                          0.0%     4  171.3 171.4 171.1 171.8   0.3
 18.|-- 91.242.241.89                          0.0%     4  171.0 171.8 170.9 173.4   1.1

In this case I would expect Starhub to pass this latency test as they have Cogent connected directly. M1 should actually be able to pass this test if they re-route traffic to SH as M1 purchased transit from SH.
 

xiaofan

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2018
Messages
31,770
Reaction score
9,078
What is interesting to me is the top right most SG server which M1 and ST are bad at. Upon digging, I found the server "sgsg-bluevps.metercdn.net" is only homed by Cogent network and nothing else.

Code:
~: mtr -rw sgsg-bluevps.metercdn.net
HOST:                                         Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  2.|-- 1.x.75.138.unknown.m1.com.sg         0.0%     4    2.9   3.3   2.7   3.9   0.5
  3.|-- 182.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg       0.0%     4    7.3   4.0   2.5   7.3   2.2
  4.|-- 181.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg       0.0%     4    3.1   3.0   2.6   3.3   0.3
  5.|-- 38.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg        0.0%     4    4.0   4.1   3.9   4.2   0.2
  6.|-- 162.246.65.202.unknown.m1.com.sg       0.0%     4    4.5   4.1   3.7   4.5   0.3
  7.|-- sng-b4-link.ip.twelve99.net            0.0%     4    4.6   4.6   4.4   4.8   0.2
  8.|-- sng-b6-link.ip.twelve99.net           25.0%     4    6.5   7.1   6.5   7.4   0.5
  9.|-- tky-b7-link.ip.twelve99.net            0.0%     4  173.1 172.8 172.4 173.1   0.3
 10.|-- lax-bb1-link.ip.twelve99.net           0.0%     4  170.7 170.4 170.1 170.7   0.3
 11.|-- lax-b22-link.ip.twelve99.net           0.0%     4  170.6 170.3 169.9 170.6   0.4
 12.|-- lax-bb2-link.ip.twelve99.net           0.0%     4  170.3 170.2 170.0 170.4   0.2
 13.|-- lax-b22-link.ip.twelve99.net          75.0%     4  170.4 170.4 170.4 170.4   0.0
 14.|-- cogent-ic-352552.ip.twelve99-cust.net  0.0%     4  171.3 170.5 170.0 171.3   0.5
 15.|-- be9040.ccr81.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com  0.0%     4  172.5 172.1 171.1 172.7   0.7
 16.|-- be8752.ccr31.sin01.atlas.cogentco.com  0.0%     4  171.2 171.2 170.9 171.5   0.3
 17.|-- 154.18.35.201                          0.0%     4  171.3 171.4 171.1 171.8   0.3
 18.|-- 91.242.241.89                          0.0%     4  171.0 171.8 170.9 173.4   1.1

In this case I would expect Starhub to pass this latency test as they have Cogent connected directly. M1 should actually be able to pass this test if they re-route traffic to SH as M1 purchased transit from SH.


So VQ and MR Gamer are both fine with BlueVPS/Cogent.

SingTel and M1 are not.

Starhub is supposed to be okay.

I guess MR non-gamer plan will be okay as well.

Not so sure about SIMBA.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top