Dear moderator-in-charge,
Firstly, would it be alright for you to identify yourself? I believe it's extremely impolite and disturbing for one to condemn another without even revealing his identity.
Forgive me for being crude but it feels like rape, where the victim is assaulted without knowing the perpetrator.
I believe an esteem member like yourself, who had been entrusted the responsibility of "upholding the mannerism and social standards" of this forum, wouldn't be a rapist, or are you?
Secondly, it has come to our attention that there may be a possible link between you and the "victim".
The victim claimed in a previous post that he has a family member who is in a position of authority within the organization itself.
http://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/71943650-post39.html
As such, it isn't too far-fetched for a common member to suspect that you may be related to the "victim" and thus relying on such drastic measures to assist the "victim" in reclaiming whatever dignity and esteem he had left. For as the saying goes, blood is thicker than water. Furthermore, I strongly believe that a sense of justice isn't part of the job requirement.
Lastly, I would like to highlight to you the severity of the implications of this issue. With over 30 members infracted and more than 5 members banned, you're risking the destruction, for the lack of a better word, of this established online community.
Not to mention the possible repercussions the victim may face for his scrupulous actions.
Perhaps you should ask yourself, are such actions really professional and beneficial in assisting the "victim"?
I believe the first action agreeably required by you is to simply identify yourself. It'll make communication must smoother and civilized.
For ultimately, everyone prefers to talk to a person and nobody enjoys being raped.
Regards,
crimsontactics
