i would blame the lappy, not HDD .. cos due to the lappy service center should forsee the stock level for replacement, they should order once the stocks is ALMOST low, to encouner any kind of hdd replacement that should be the way.. thus without letting the consumers to wait.... cos they were suppose to provide the whole service. they . with the lappy did said sorry and inform the consumers what is going on will be alright.
That is the root of the issues most are us here is facing is mainly ON. You can't really pre-order as you don't know where and who the customers are, thus the forsee part can never be materialised unless MR or any of the ISP is the sole provider and thus they can assume everyone will be on them install for everyone.
The root cause for most of the cases users faced is with ON follow up being slow and inconsistent. This is ignoring the fact that ON didn't do a good job for quite a lot of TP installation and yet on their system put the site and point as ready. As you might know provider like MR can't really access the customer ON cabinet and thus they cannot perform any pre-installation testing without ON involvement, thus MR can only act on good faith based on ON words that the site/TP is ready.
Just like the HDD example I used, the restriction to a specific brand is not a hidden secret and just in the case of ON, it is the government mandate that all provider has to use ON and no other. Thus just like in the example, the laptop manufacturer is caught dead in the middle. The next best thing to do for them is ensure communication channel are setup proper and keeping the affected customers on the next best schedule, even if it tentatively which is what MR had failed to do.
Last edited:
