HWZ Forums

Login Register FAQ Mark Forums Read

Do Cables MAtter and other related chat

Like Tree27Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 16-07-2020, 11:06 PM   #76
High Supremacy Member
 
wwenze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 44,216
I have friend can see ghosts
A bad analog video connection causing signal reflection does result in ghosting

__________________
"You guys need to work because you are essential workers"
"Pay us more then"
"No"
wwenze is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2020, 11:08 PM   #77
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,434
Or in humans some variant of schizophrenia and hallucination heheh
benedium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2020, 11:24 PM   #78
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,395
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/f...onnects.14732/
https://www.audiosciencereview.com/f...-cables.14728/

I suppose escksu is Clearnfc then....

Last edited by lxXXxl; 16-07-2020 at 11:31 PM..
lxXXxl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-07-2020, 11:36 PM   #79
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,434
Hahaha... good one.
I admire his perseverance though.
benedium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 12:11 AM   #80
Senior Member
 
LiLAsN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,786
Post by LiLAsN (I guess he is reputable in here). He said it made a big difference to him after he switch to WE (should be western electric) cables.

He also said Thus why when I went to a 9AWG WE cable (2m) the audio seem to be able to flow easily without much resistance especially in the high frequencies thanks to the pure copper cabling
I gave an explanation as to why I notice the highs were more pronounced. Like ear fatiguing type of pronounced while the mids and the bass become very muddy. And the soundstage was so huge. Things were not where they were supposed to be kind of huge (distorted soundstage).

It was all explained in a video I posted from the Dirac interview. Where they mentioned how going out of phase (due to less resistance I presume and my cables having mismatch lengths. So the correction that Dirac has done was no longer applicable to the new speaker cables.)

For example, let's pretend my old speaker cables, together with the resistance resulted in a 3ms delay. Dirac comes in and corrects the speaker delays so that by the time all the audio meets up at the first microphone position, your main listening seat, all the sound will come at the same time. So Dirac software makes some audio come out faster on some speakers and slower on the others and by the time the sounds all reach that listening seat, they are all now at 0ms. No delays between each speaker.

Now, I've replaced my speaker cables. But due to less resistance, the signal can reach the speakers at just a 1ms delay. But my Dirac still employs the same amount of phase correction (timing delay) based on my old cables. The result is now the front speakers are playing audio at a -2ms faster than my surround speakers. The result of having the other speakers too having different delays results in what I experienced. The muddy bass and mids and very pronounced highs as well as causing the sound stage to either increase or decrease. In my case, it was increase.

It explained why I got that pronounced highs. And it wasn't because some frequency signals were able to be transferred, my measurement graph that I showed the before and after proved that there's not much change to the frequency. In the end, it was because of the phase difference (timing distortion). As seen here.



You can read more to my finding that explained what I heard here in the full post.
https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/1...40-post24.html


Btw, now that many people understand how different cables with different level of resistance that leads to the timing for each speaker starting to play the audio defers from every cable, it explains a lot of why people say how cables can make the sound feel more open or that the highs were more pronounced or that the soundstage has increased.

In fact, the funniest part is when you watch this latest SpareChange video (linked below). They both talk exactly all the points that I mentioned that the gauge and the resulting resistance causes delays in when the audio plays and without any sort of Room Correction to properly sync the timing of all the speakers, this is the result. Their findings changing from 1 cable to another is the same as mine. But what they don't know is that the frequency measurement should remain the same. But it was the phase difference (timing distortion) between each speaker that caused the soundstage to increase or decrease and therefore making the mids and bass muddier and the highs still maintaining their clarity under the more muddy bass resulting in the more "pronounced highs" that people experience with a change of cables.

It is really funny to watch once you understand the science of what is causing this don't you think?
Not because the cables bring more frequency information that was 'missing' but because the length and resistance of each individual cable (even a simple difference in length of the cables between the cable meant for the right speaker and the other for the left speaker or the slight different in resistance on the right and left speaker cables) can cause the speakers to go out of phase, thus altering the soundstage.

Here. Have a look at the video. Exactly what I had experienced and exactly what was explained in the Dirac interview powerpoint slide.

The full Dirac interview.


Here's the cable comparison video that will give you a laugh as they think that the cables made any sonic difference or frequency changes to the audio when it was actually just a phase difference (timing distortion) that is changing their soundstage and muddying their mids and bass that the highs became clearer.



And as mentioned, my frequency chart of before and after. And my before once was done weeks before the 'after' chart as this was when I was doing my room correction. So they are weeks apart but ultimately, frequency wise, sound wise, sonically wise, they sound the same on paper. But phase wise, it resulted in us hearing this change in soundstage and having certain frequencies that are not easily 'fazed' (pun intended) like the high frequency sounds thus why they got more pronounced while their mids and low frequencies became muffled in all these timing distortions.

Last edited by LiLAsN; 17-07-2020 at 08:08 AM..
LiLAsN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 12:21 AM   #81
Moderator
 
petetherock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,510
To TS, I've merged your various cable related chat since it's still encircling the same areas.
A reminder to all:
Let's stick to tech talk and avoid personal attacks or trolling.

Thanks
__________________
POST YOUR QUESTIONS INSTEAD OF SENDING A PM



Use the Search Button and Read the Stickies!




My home theatre gear and my blog:

https://peteswrite.blogspot.com/2020...tup-22020.html
petetherock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 07:43 AM   #82
Master Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,751
To TS, I've merged your various cable related chat since it's still encircling the same areas.
A reminder to all:
Let's stick to tech talk and avoid personal attacks or trolling.

Thanks
Thanks!! I am glad things are getting more constructive now.
Clearnfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 07:48 AM   #83
Master Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,751
I gave an explanation as to why I notice the highs were more pronounced. Like ear fatiguing type of pronounced while the mids and the bass become very muddy. And the soundstage was so huge. Things were not where they were supposed to be kind of huge (distorted soundstage).

It was all explained in a video I posted from the Dirac interview. Where they mentioned how going out of phase (due to less resistance I presume and my cables having mismatch lengths. So the correction that Dirac has done was no longer applicable to the new speaker cables.)

For example, let's pretend my old speaker cables, together with the resistance resulted in a 3ms delay. Dirac comes in and corrects the speaker delays so that by the time all the audio meets up at the first microphone position, your main listening seat, all the sound will come at the same time. So Dirac software makes some audio come out faster on some speakers and slower on the others and by the time the sounds all reach that listening seat, they are all now at 0ms. No delays between each speaker.

Now, I've replaced my speaker cables. But due to less resistance, the signal can reach the speakers at just a 1ms delay. But my Dirac still employs the same amount of phase correction (timing delay) based on my old cables. The result is now the front speakers are playing audio at a -2ms faster than my surround speakers. The result of having the other speakers too having different delays results in what I experienced. The muddy bass and mids and very pronounced highs as well as causing the sound stage to either increase or decrease. In my case, it was increase.

It explained why I got that pronounced highs. And it wasn't because some frequency signals were able to be transferred, my measurement graph that I showed the before and after proved that there's not much change to the frequency. In the end, it was because of the phase difference (timing distortion). As seen here.



You can read more to my finding that explained what I heard here in the full post.
https://forums.hardwarezone.com.sg/1...40-post24.html


Btw, now that many people understand how different cables with different level of resistance that leads to the timing for each speaker starting to play the audio defers from every cable, it explains a lot of why people say how cables can make the sound feel more open or that the highs were more pronounced or that the soundstage has increased.

In fact, the funniest part is when you watch this latest video. They both talk exactly all the points that I mentioned that the gauge and the resulting resistance causes delays in when the audio plays and without any sort of Room Correction to properly sync the timing of all the speakers, this is the result. Their findings changing from 1 cable to another is the same as mine. But what they don't know is that the frequency measurement should remain the same. But it was the phase difference (timing distortion) between each speaker that caused the soundstage to increase or decrease and therefore making the mids and bass muddier and the highs still maintaining their clarity under the more muddy bass resulting in the more "pronounced highs" that people experience with a change of cables.

It is really funny to watch once you understand the science of what is causing this don't you think?
Not because the cables bring more frequency information that was 'missing' but because the length and resistance of each individual cable (even a simple difference in length of the cables between the cable meant for the right and the other for the left or the slight different in resistance on the right and left) can cause the speakers to go out of phase, thus altering the soundstage.

Here. Have a look at the video. Exactly what I had experienced and exactly what was explained in the Dirac interview powerpoint slide.

The full Dirac interview.


Here's the cable comparison video that will give you a laugh as they think that the cables made any sonic difference or frequency changes to the audio when it was actually just a phase difference (timing distortion) that is changing their soundstage and muddying their mids and bass that the highs became clearer.



And as mentioned, my frequency chart of before and after. And my before once was done weeks before the 'after' chart as this was when I was doing my room correction. So they are weeks apart but ultimately, frequency wise, sound wise, sonically wise, they sound the same on paper. But phase wise, it resulted in us hearing this change in soundstage and having certain frequencies that are not easily 'fazed' (pun intended) like the high frequency sounds thus why they got more pronounced while their mids and low frequencies became muffled in all these timing distortions.
Oh phase difference!! I didnt know that. Good one!! Learn something new today. WE 9awg cables looks good...

I would say the only downside with such thick cables would be the weight and they are extremely hard to use!! I ever use AFA cables before. Its very thick and heavy. The speaker posts on my amp came off!! Feel like trying it out.
Clearnfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 08:05 AM   #84
Supremacy Member
 
hmsweethm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,238
@LiLAsN, your that graph showing Western electric is similar to Audyssey multieq Software?
I thinking of going to SLT and hoot 1 pair of cables to replace for my front spk & run the software to see see.
Just out of curiosity and got spare cash.
hmsweethm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 08:07 AM   #85
High Supremacy Member
 
mypillowtalks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 32,290
Anyone here calculate how much power is lost/voltage drop through the speaker cables? So to size them appropriately?

For my work in real life, i often need to size power cables and calculate voltage drop and short circuit capacity for electrical installation (so to comply to code of practice).

But i am not sure what should be taken into account if i were to calculate for speaker and amplifier.

Im thinking whether the drop in voltage due to small cable size between amp and speaker will have an impact or not.

In the past, i estimate the power sent to my speaker by measuring the voltage at the speaker terminal, then square the value and divide by the nominal resistance. Then i set the limiter on my processor to limit power. But the impedance of speaker coil varies with frequency.
Maybe when im free i think about this.

Just some thinking.

Sent from Your Favourite Non-Biting Talking Pillow using GAGT

Last edited by mypillowtalks; 17-07-2020 at 08:23 AM..
mypillowtalks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 08:12 AM   #86
Arch-Supremacy Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 12,517
Good perspective LiLAsN!
Public forum means opposing views and discussions / debates.
Closed forum / Private facebook groups can have better control of singular ideas and rejection of opposing views. Good real life examples include churches / mosques / temples.
To be sure, audiophiles are really no different from some religious fanatics... who believe what they like to believe... Lol...

.. as for speaker cables, I'll just stick to my trusty gold/silver ones...
__________________
.
🌼 ...Savour The Divine Fragrance... 🌼
yoyokid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 08:34 AM   #87
Master Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,751
Btw, even if at the end of the test, user insists he can hear the difference, no one can really say he's wrong, because no one else has his ears.

But the captured data will help to narrow down all the guessing. Another person can look at the data and decides it's not worth his time and money. Yet another person may decide the cables' looks matches his audio system. Like Porsche car need to match Porsche wheels and not monster truck wheels...

But from a cable seller pov, I can understand their reluctance...
For this, it is still impossible to tell by looking at the data. Like what you have mentioned, matching is important. No matter how good the cable seems on paper, it may not be suitable for your system. Certain cables may sound too bright on some systems and its really horrible. But on some its sounds great.

Using porsche as an analogy. You replace the suspension of the porsche. It looks awesome on paper, spring rate, damping rate etc...the springs and dampers are carefully matched to ensure they are the same (yes, not joking, me also into cars). But without driving the car, how do you tell it is indeed better??

I originally thought that multi-link is the best. Till cruze changes my thinking. Their torsion beam with watts link beat the bmws...me speechless ...

Also matching, it doesnt mean good or racing springs and dampers is good for the car. You might find your car too bumpy because road is uneven. Then too stiff also causes wheel lift due to uneven road surface. Then later, its the chassis flexing instead. Lowering ride height looks good, lower cg. Supposed to be better in corner. Not so, too low affects your suspension arm angle and hence roll center, could make things worse instead.
Clearnfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 08:43 AM   #88
Master Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,751
Anyone here calculate how much power is lost/voltage drop through the speaker cables? So to size them appropriately?

For my work in real life, i often need to size power cables and calculate voltage drop and short circuit capacity for electrical installation (so to comply to code of practice).

But i am not sure what should be taken into account if i were to calculate for speaker and amplifier.

Im thinking whether the drop in voltage due to small cable size between amp and speaker will have an impact or not.

In the past, i estimate the power sent to my speaker by measuring the voltage at the speaker terminal, then square the value and divide by the nominal resistance. Then i set the limiter on my processor to limit power. But the impedance of speaker coil varies with frequency.
Maybe when im free i think about this.

Just some thinking.

Sent from Your Favourite Non-Biting Talking Pillow using GAGT
Regarding this, voltage drop due to resistance is very little. But other factors like phase would be more apparent. Regarding a sweet spot, ASR mentioned about 12AWG. Thicker is better but may be hard to work with.
Clearnfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 08:45 AM   #89
Master Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 3,751
@LiLAsN, your that graph showing Western electric is similar to Audyssey multieq Software?
I thinking of going to SLT and hoot 1 pair of cables to replace for my front spk & run the software to see see.
Just out of curiosity and got spare cash.
Where to get this we 9awg?? Thinking of giving it a try... Hopefully my speaker posts wont come off...lol
Clearnfc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-07-2020, 08:57 AM   #90
High Supremacy Member
 
wwenze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 44,216
Careful with talking about phase shift in cables... Wouldn't want to go into the same thinking trap we did with skin effect i.e. it exists but not at the amount where you think it matters.

Phase shift vs frequency is measurable with impulse response. You can also calculate it since it is due to RC or R(whatever the speaker complex load is). I mean if we are too arsed to calculate like most engineers are we can just measure. Any mic will do, too.

BTW here's the kicker: Your speakers have phase shifts by themselves. That's why newer speakers are more and more anal about time alignment.

Also your tweeter usually has resistors in series, it's in the crossover.

You know what else actually matters more when we talk about delay? The distance between you and your speaker.

This distance is also what causes time alignment to screw up when the distance between tweeter and woofer is different i.e. small vertical sweet spot. Notice how some speakers purposely put the tweeter slightly behind the woofer to fix this.

That's why the often mentioned head-vice joke in diyaudio.

Sound is 343m/s, so 0.1ms it travels 3.4cm. 0.1ms is also one whole cycle at 10kHz. How easy is it to find 3.4cm worth of difference in real life?

Last edited by wwenze; 17-07-2020 at 09:10 AM..
wwenze is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Terms of Service for more information.


Thread Tools

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On