For discussion - Will most singaporeans be able to achieve FRS?

THEMIKOS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
587
Reaction score
0
Was wondering if majority of Singaporeans will be able to achieve FRS when they turn 55.

Example
Let's say a 30 year old is earning a salary of $3500 a month with $0 balances across all 3 of his CPF accounts.
In 20 years time his balances will be as follows:
OA: 209033
SA: 183540
MA: 57200

This calculation is based on a flat salary of $3500 over 20 years excluding bonuses and pay increments. What more, he still has another 5 years of compounding interest to reach 55.

Based on this, will it be safe to say that majority of singaporeans (those who work consistently) will be able to meet the min sum? Why then do we always read about complains of seniors unable to withdraw their savings because they can't hit minimum sum? I have yet to read a story of anyone who says that CPF is good and he is now a rich man due to the govt's forced savings. Lol. Anyone has any stories or opinions to share/discuss?
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,220
Reaction score
3,059
Was wondering if majority of Singaporeans will be able to achieve FRS when they turn 55....
A slight majority of today's Singaporeans, yes, probably. Older cohorts are different. For perspective, the $3,500/month figure you picked is a little below the 2018 median of $3,792. (Note: The Ministry of Manpower reports median wages inclusive of the employer's CPF contribution. Take that MOM reported figure and divide by 1.17 if you want the more common wage figure that most employees talk about.)

Based on this, will it be safe to say that majority of singaporeans (those who work consistently) will be able to meet the min sum?
I think you mean the Full Retirement Sum.

Today's Singaporeans, probably. However, there are significant numbers of stay-at-home parents, self-employed individuals, and disabled adults. These individuals often end up with low or zero CPF balances (except for MediSave for self-employed individuals, which is compulsory).

I have yet to read a story of anyone who says that CPF is good and he is now a rich man due to the govt's forced savings.
Actually, there are such stories. Look for stories about Loo Cheng Chuan, for example.
 

Oldnerd79

Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2018
Messages
364
Reaction score
126
There is such a man. Ak71, his CPF is loaded. I followed his suggestion to top up cpf Special account via cash and also tRF from OA, after a few years of doing so I managed to hit FRS at age 39.

Without topping up and TRF from OA, it is still possible but maybe not easy for low income earners.
 

rrr2015

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
7,453
Reaction score
1,597
love reading these real life stories. but by the time we reach 65, worried 1M may not mean much
Actually, there are such stories. Look for stories about Loo Cheng Chuan, for example.

he also very successful investor himself. wish i have read it earlier
There is such a man. Ak71, his CPF is loaded. I followed his suggestion to top up cpf Special account via cash and also tRF from OA, after a few years of doing so I managed to hit FRS at age 39.

Without topping up and TRF from OA, it is still possible but maybe not easy for low income earners.
 

henrylbh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
15,781
Reaction score
704
Was wondering if majority of Singaporeans will be able to achieve FRS when they turn 55.

Example
Let's say a 30 year old is earning a salary of $3500 a month with $0 balances across all 3 of his CPF accounts.
In 20 years time his balances will be as follows:
OA: 209033
SA: 183540
MA: 57200

This calculation is based on a flat salary of $3500 over 20 years excluding bonuses and pay increments. What more, he still has another 5 years of compounding interest to reach 55.

Based on this, will it be safe to say that majority of singaporeans (those who work consistently) will be able to meet the min sum?

Now FRS is 176,000. 20 years later, SA would be $317,000 if annual increment is 3%, to meet prevailing FRS.
 

henrylbh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
15,781
Reaction score
704
Was wondering if majority of Singaporeans will be able to achieve FRS when they turn 55.

Example
I have yet to read a story of anyone who says that CPF is good and he is now a rich man due to the govt's forced savings. Lol. Anyone has any stories or opinions to share/discuss?

Have you not read or heard one MP who said he always happy and laughing whenever he receives his CPF statement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxOgjmcGJ6g

He receives his CPF statement every month compare to lesser mortals?
 
Last edited:

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,220
Reaction score
3,059
Now FRS is 176,000. 20 years later, SA would be $317,000 if annual increment is 3%, to meet prevailing FRS.
Right, but it’s at least fairly likely the BRS/FRS/ERS increases won’t be as much as 3% per year for 20+ years (the government has explained they’re only in “catch up mode” right now), wages are subject to inflation and career progression effects, and most people work longer than 20 years. Also, this forecast assumes zero bonuses (evidently not even a “13th month”), zero cash top ups for tax relief, zero government top ups, zero extra employer contributions to MediSave, and zero OA to SA transfers for higher interest.
 

THEMIKOS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
587
Reaction score
0
Yup, its a little sick to be honest to know that future generations are gonna have to meet ever increasing FRS. I wonder when will this ever stop. Cannot be it keeps increasing till a million dollars right (though we wont be affected coz we would mostly be six feet under).

Now FRS is 176,000. 20 years later, SA would be $317,000 if annual increment is 3%, to meet prevailing FRS.
 

havetheveryfun

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
26,313
Reaction score
3,439
Was wondering if majority of Singaporeans will be able to achieve FRS when they turn 55.

Example
Let's say a 30 year old is earning a salary of $3500 a month with $0 balances across all 3 of his CPF accounts.
In 20 years time his balances will be as follows:
OA: 209033
SA: 183540
MA: 57200

This calculation is based on a flat salary of $3500 over 20 years excluding bonuses and pay increments. What more, he still has another 5 years of compounding interest to reach 55.

Based on this, will it be safe to say that majority of singaporeans (those who work consistently) will be able to meet the min sum? Why then do we always read about complains of seniors unable to withdraw their savings because they can't hit minimum sum? I have yet to read a story of anyone who says that CPF is good and he is now a rich man due to the govt's forced savings. Lol. Anyone has any stories or opinions to share/discuss?

It's simple, because you forgot to take into account housing.

A lot of young people like to overspend on housing, buying a much more expensive house than they can afford to.

But then again, housing is still the killer, In your above example if the person buys a 4-room flat at 400k, and shares co-pay 200k with his other half, his OA would be wiped.

Also, there are quite a % of people whose salary never gets pass $3000 throughout their lives.
 

THEMIKOS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
587
Reaction score
0
U are correct. Thats why i did a comparison with the figure of $3500. So for those who are worried they cant reach FRS, all they need to do is play around with their bonuses and the figure of 1.17 to see if they ever hit 3500 monthly in whatever combinations they can think of.

Right, but it’s at least fairly likely the BRS/FRS/ERS increases won’t be as much as 3% per year for 20+ years (the government has explained they’re only in “catch up mode” right now), wages are subject to inflation and career progression effects, and most people work longer than 20 years. Also, this forecast assumes zero bonuses (evidently not even a “13th month”), zero cash top ups for tax relief, zero government top ups, zero extra employer contributions to MediSave, and zero OA to SA transfers for higher interest.
 

THEMIKOS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
587
Reaction score
0
Actually i purposely left housing out because i wanted it to be a "fair" comparison. Like u mentioned, ppl tend to buy bigger and more expensive houses. But u are right, perhaps i should have included housing in my calculations. 😢

It's simple, because you forgot to take into account housing.

A lot of young people like to overspend on housing, buying a much more expensive house than they can afford to.

But then again, housing is still the killer, In your above example if the person buys a 4-room flat at 400k, and shares co-pay 200k with his other half, his OA would be wiped.

Also, there are quite a % of people whose salary never gets pass $3000 throughout their lives.
 

undiscern

Master Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2005
Messages
3,863
Reaction score
449
Can be done. Low OA due to servicing house
3b095b59c14e06c1dbaf9e7b8ba1c63d-full.jpg
 
Last edited:

d9_lives

Senior Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2008
Messages
1,760
Reaction score
182
Frankly, it's quite easy to hit FRS.
I wish the SA ceiling is much higher.

Compound interest is the eighth wonder of the world. He who understands it, earns it ... he who doesn't ... pays it.
Albert Einstein
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,220
Reaction score
3,059
Yup, its a little sick to be honest to know that future generations are gonna have to meet ever increasing FRS.
No, that's not correct. The government doesn't impose an obligation on anybody to hit a particular minimum(*), or to have even one dollar in their Retirement Accounts. The Full Retirement Sum is the default maximum level of Retirement Account funding on your 55th birthday, and that's pretty much all it is.

I wonder when will this ever stop.
Never, or at least not until the Singapore dollar ceases to exist. Inflation is real.

Cannot be it keeps increasing till a million dollars right (though we wont be affected coz we would mostly be six feet under).
At some point in the presumably distant future the Full Retirement Sum will be S$1 million, but that S$1 million won't have anywhere near the real purchasing power it has today. (Well, OK, those future dollars will be able to purchase an iPhone 68 which will be unimaginably incredible -- maybe it'll brush your teeth for you? -- but that's a different point.)

I wish the SA ceiling is much higher.
Me too.

(*) The government only has contribution requirements for citizens and PRs who work in Singapore in the labor market (not for those who work as homemakers, for example). If the compulsory contributions end up supporting a Basic Retirement Sum-sized Retirement Account or larger, then the BRS is the practical minimum. But if less, then that's the minimum.
 
Last edited:

mummy1234

Banned
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
17,124
Reaction score
31
Yup, its a little sick to be honest to know that future generations are gonna have to meet ever increasing FRS. I wonder when will this ever stop. Cannot be it keeps increasing till a million dollars right (though we wont be affected coz we would mostly be six feet under).

That is why some believe in topping up their children's cpf from young.
 

yoongf

Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2000
Messages
5,575
Reaction score
889
Are the numbers correct?

Allocation rates for SA is abt 5% abv MA. But numbers show SA is 4 times MA figures?

Yet to do any detailed calculations but the Numbers do look significantly optimistic.

Let's say a 30 year old is earning a salary of $3500 a month with $0 balances across all 3 of his CPF accounts.
In 20 years time his balances will be as follows:
OA: 209033
SA: 183540
MA: 57200

This calculation is based on a flat salary of $3500 over 20 years excluding bonuses and pay increments. What more, he still has another 5 years of compounding interest to reach 55.
 

THEMIKOS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
587
Reaction score
0
No, that's not correct. The government doesn't impose an obligation on anybody to hit a particular minimum(*), or to have even one dollar in their Retirement Accounts. The Full Retirement Sum is the default maximum level of Retirement Account funding on your 55th birthday, and that's pretty much all it is.

.

Why do u say the govt doesnt impose an obligation on anybody? I think they do actually, in a different way. What was promised was that CPF was gonna be the working man's pot of cash upon hitting a certain age. And then CPF Life came up where if u do not hit the FRS, u cannot withdraw anything more than 5k?

Now i do not have knowledge about the 20% that one can withdraw once or just before he starts to draw CPF Life payouts (just found out by reading this forum a few days ago) so let's not consider that as part of the payout one can withdraw after the initial 5k.

Let's consider a person who has a combined OA+SA balance of 174k now. He can only withdraw 5k instead of what he was "promised" of 174k (am guessing, dont know what cpf rules there were previously). Now isn't this considered an imposement by the govt for the man to not be able to use his money, aka save?
 

THEMIKOS

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2007
Messages
587
Reaction score
0
99% correct, used the CPF APP to get the numbers.

The parameters were, salary 3500, sa ma and oa acct start with $0.. 20 years compounding based on the birth year 1989
Are the numbers correct?

Allocation rates for SA is abt 5% abv MA. But numbers show SA is 4 times MA figures?

Yet to do any detailed calculations but the Numbers do look significantly optimistic.
 
Last edited:
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top