[magnus]

Those sets from mustafa are sealed with plastic wrap and have a hologram sticker on the box surface. Wondering any difference from those in fareast retail shops.

[kennyboy]

Vulpix wrote:

73% Android OS over 6 hours and 4% battery drain.

Eh....u got no right to talk hor.... You ish always the one to play both sides of the fence. Sometimes say it doesn't affect, but also the first to post kernels/news that supposedly decreases it, then claim miracles after changing routers etc etc etc....

Be consistent can or not boh.....

[ym901s]

magnus wrote:

Those sets from mustafa are sealed with plastic wrap and have a hologram sticker on the box surface. Wondering any difference from those in fareast retail shops.

I bought from that famous fareast retail shop that starts with "W" before and can confirmed that their handsets are definitely NOT plastic wrapped

[Vulpix]

kennyboy wrote:

Eh....u got no right to talk hor.... You ish always the one to play both sides of the fence. Sometimes say it doesn't affect, but also the first to post kernels/news that supposedly decreases it, then claim miracles after changing routers etc etc etc....

Be consistent can or not boh.....

You don't believe me what can I do? I change router and the Android OS really drop. Then I switch back it went up, don't believe me I also don't benefit from you believing me. If there is a fix to the high AOS % got wrong to post about meh? Siyah kernel did decrease the AOS % what.

I think maybe my england not good enough, but I've only been trying to say that those who think AOS is the thinking draining their battery 40% overnight need to recheck again what is draining their phone and not blaming the AOS% only. And should not be too concerned about the % also. But I also unhappy Samsung never resolve this issue when they managed to resolve it on the Nexus S.

[magnus]

mine also bought from fareast. Went to all the 3 famous shops there and saw non have plastic wrap and some sets even have broken seal. i checked mine to make sure the sealed sticker has not been open b4. hehe

Maybe mustafa have their own dept to wrap all their stocks.

ym901s wrote:

I bought from that famous fareast retail shop that starts with "W" before and can confirmed that their handsets are definitely NOT plastic wrapped

[Oinkize]

Vulpix wrote:

You don't believe me what can I do? I change router and the Android OS really drop. Then I switch back it went up, don't believe me I also don't benefit from you believing me. If there is a fix to the high AOS % got wrong to post about meh? Siyah kernel did decrease the AOS % what.

I think maybe my england not good enough, but I've only been trying to say that those who think AOS is the thinking draining their battery 40% overnight need to recheck again what is draining their phone and not blaming the AOS% only. And should not be too concerned about the % also. But I also unhappy Samsung never resolve this issue when they managed to resolve it on the Nexus S.

did it occur to you that the little bird who told me that samsung is not really the 1 doing the f/w and it is goole that is doing could be true?

[ym901s]

magnus wrote:

mine also bought from fareast. Went to all the 3 famous shops there and saw non have plastic wrap and some sets even have broken seal. i checked mine to make sure the sealed sticker has not been open b4. hehe

Maybe mustafa have their own dept to wrap all their stocks.

Why do you think these famous shops sell cheaper than elsewhere?

[magnus]

no idea. maybe due to competition within the same mall and they want make by selling volume and not higher marked up

As long as the set is sealed with stickers intact im ok with it.

ym901s wrote:

Why do you think these famous shops sell cheaper than elsewhere?

[kennyboy]

Vulpix wrote:

You don't believe me what can I do? I change router and the Android OS really drop. Then I switch back it went up, don't believe me I also don't benefit from you believing me. If there is a fix to the high AOS % got wrong to post about meh? Siyah kernel did decrease the AOS % what.

I think maybe my england not good enough, but I've only been trying to say that those who think AOS is the thinking draining their battery 40% overnight need to recheck again what is draining their phone and not blaming the AOS% only. And should not be too concerned about the % also. But I also unhappy Samsung never resolve this issue when they managed to resolve it on the Nexus S.

You ask them not to be concerned about it, but when there's a fix for it, you're also the first to be concerned over it....catch no ball. Besides, given the reams of documentation on it, it has nothing to do with wifi router, most probably a placebo effect/chance.

Just leave it be lah...you being so emo and schizophrenic over this issue isn't making things easier for the people who don't care or understand.

Now you say it's not important, don't care about it. When there's a fix, suddenly it's important, good fix to fix a non-important problem. So it's an important fix for a non-important problem? I getting headache liao....

People ask, I just say it's like that one. No need to waste time explaining something that doesn't matter practically. They wanna kpkb compare to iphone, leave them be lor, their loss. They wanna blame AOS, let them lor.....it's not as if they ripping off a chunk of your meat everytime someone does that.

[simic]

whats the selling price at mustafa?

higher than far east?

[kennyboy]

Oinkize wrote:

did it occur to you that the little bird who told me that samsung is not really the 1 doing the f/w and it is goole that is doing could be true?

Some people damn despo to prove their point.

No one said Google isn't doing the fw for their Nexus phones....but how sure are you the manufacturers have ZERO involvement in the fw?

[Dallen]

simic wrote:

whats the selling price at mustafa?

higher than far east?

Becareful..i think export set

[Vulpix]

kennyboy wrote:

You ask them not to be concerned about it, but when there's a fix for it, you're also the first to be concerned over it....catch no ball. Besides, given the reams of documentation on it, it has nothing to do with wifi router, most probably a placebo effect/chance.

Just leave it be lah...you being so emo and schizophrenic over this issue isn't making things easier for the people who don't care or understand.

Now you say it's not important, don't care about it. When there's a fix, suddenly it's important, good fix to fix a non-important problem. So it's an important fix for a non-important problem? I getting headache liao....

People ask, I just say it's like that one. No need to waste time explaining something that doesn't matter practically. They wanna kpkb compare to iphone, leave them be lor, their loss. They wanna blame AOS, let them lor.....it's not as if they ripping off a chunk of your meat everytime someone does that.

Well, I didn't say it was important when the fix was out, just thought it was interesting a kernel managed to get the AOS to become lower and get rid of the suspend bug. It was kinda exciting to me at that time anyway.

simic wrote:

whats the selling price at mustafa?

higher than far east?

Dallen wrote:

Becareful..i think export set

just make sure the warranty card address is a local singapore service centre.

[kennyboy]

Vulpix wrote:

Well, I didn't say it was important when the fix was out, just thought it was interesting a kernel managed to get the AOS to become lower and get rid of the suspend bug. It was kinda exciting to me at that time anyway.

Just leave them be lah.....no need to stand up in defense of your new favorite gadget every time you sight a perceived wrong.

That kind of action is only left to the fanboys, like Apple and Sony Ericsson. Don't stoop to their levels. You know first hand how obnoxious SomE of them can be.