MyWill
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2016
- Messages
- 24,057
- Reaction score
- 3,947
Harnor. What happened to them?how about the rest of 86%?
Harnor. What happened to them?how about the rest of 86%?
The glass is 14.3% fullDon't look at the glass half empty.
The glass is half full.
the rich will prevent the poor from moving up as it will hurt status quoCause your assumption wrong liao. Everyone doesn’t have an equal chance.
Your status at birth does affect your status at 30s. The race is not fair from the day you born.
you born as rich man son vs poor man son the difference is damn big.
Society has implemented means to move up, but it’s not easy man.
That's why I am saying. The figures show that in Singapore, people don't have similar chance.Cause your assumption wrong liao. Everyone doesn’t have an equal chance.
Your status at birth does affect your status at 30s. The race is not fair from the day you born.
you born as rich man son vs poor man son the difference is damn big.
Society has implemented means to move up, but it’s not easy man.
It’s not really newsworthy to report someone born in bottom 20 and remain in bottom 20 mah.Survivor bias. Like what the other edmwer said, what about the majority 86% ? You don't hear stories about those who failed.
History are written by the victors
Cause your assumption wrong liao. Everyone doesn’t have an equal chance.
Your status at birth does affect your status at 30s. The race is not fair from the day you born.
you born as rich man son vs poor man son the difference is damn big.
Society has implemented means to move up, but it’s not easy man.
It’s not really newsworthy to report someone born in bottom 20 and remain in bottom 20 mah.
success stories get more attention cause we all wish we can be that success person.
Maybe got 0.1% strike TOTO or got windfall.Let's face it, life isn't fair, but for 14.3% of the bottom 20% to make it to the top. That's very impressive already, they probably climbed up through education. So if you're born poor, better study hard. You may need to work harder than those already born with a silver spoon, but at least you get a chance to break out of poverty, unlike those in your position born in a 3rd world country.
the perfect example of rich father famous son is donald trump lor. trump is not the most intelligent person but due to his father he could do anything he wanted, president, real estate mogul, etc.
particularly in east asia u can also see those ppl grandfather rich, father famous, son rich and famous, etc.
but probably with these two faced 'xiao ren' is they backstab everyone even family and friends and sometimes u can see publicly breakup with wife, friends, family...then u see sue wife, sue siblings, etc lor.
get into business or politics is all their cronies one.
But not every son with one million dollar loan became as rich as Trump eventually
So it is better to be borned poor.In his speech on Friday, Mr Wong said that the level of Singapore’s carbon emissions is what determines the trajectory of its fiscal strategy, alongside the level of inequality and its aging population.
Singapore’s Gini coefficient, which measures inequality, has been on a steady decline since 2007, especially after taking the Government’s redistributive policies and transfers into account, he added.
“It is not just about redistribution. Fundamentally, we want every Singaporean, regardless of background, to have the opportunity to progress and succeed based on his or her own effort and talents.”
A 2015 study by the Ministry of Finance, which looked at children born from 1978 to 1982, found that 14.3 per cent of children born to the bottom one-fifth of income earners later moved on in life to become the top-fifth income earners among their peers in their 30s.
Although the figure has dropped slightly to 14 per cent for those born from 1985 to 1989, Mr Wong pointed out that this proportion is better than many other countries.
To this end, Singapore has invested heavily on education, and rolled out social policies such as SkillsFuture and the Workfare Income Supplement scheme. The latter works as a negative income tax since it hands out cash supplements to workers whose incomes are below a certain threshold.
These programmes require recurrent funding, which are borne by taxes that apply to the current generation who benefit from such policies.
Read more at https://www.todayonline.com/singapo...xt-budget-current-level-too-low-lawrence-wong