[GE2025] Extensive changes to electoral boundaries due to population shifts; only 5 GRCs, 4 SMCs left intact

mryang

Banned
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
156,984
Reaction score
17,580
GE2025: Opposition Parties Respond to Electoral Boundary Changes

Source: The Straits Times and Must Share News (as cited in the provided article)

Published Date: March 11, 2025

Article Summary:

The Workers' Party (WP), Progress Singapore Party (PSP), and Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) have responded to the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee's (EBRC) report released on Tuesday, March 11th. The EBRC report outlined changes to electoral boundaries in Singapore, impacting various constituencies.

Workers' Party (WP):

- The WP acknowledged the EBRC's justifications for the redrawn boundaries, including population growth in certain districts.

- The WP highlighted that there were significant changes to areas where they have been actively working for the past few years.

- They will share more information on potential candidates and constituencies they will contest in due course.

- The WP has been engaging residents in at least eight constituencies, including Tampines GRC and Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC.

- Significant changes include the transfer of three polling districts in Tampines West from Aljunied GRC to Tampines GRC.

- Sengkang GRC and Hougang SMC remained largely unchanged.

Progress Singapore Party (PSP):

- The PSP welcomed the EBRC's increased reasoning behind its decisions compared to previous reports.

- The PSP felt that the EBRC could have addressed population shifts without making significant changes to major electoral boundaries.

- They suggested that the development of the new Tengah estate could have been managed by merging Hong Kah North SMC with Yuhua SMC and Bukit Batok SMC to create a new GRC.

- The PSP questioned why the EBRC used population shifts as a reason to alter the electoral boundaries of:

- Jurong GRC

- West Coast GRC

- Chua Chu Kang GRC

- Tanjong Pagar GRC

- Radin Mas SMC

- The PSP will review the report and announce its contesting constituencies at a later date.

- The PSP's founder and chairman, Tan Cheng Bock, plans to run in the next election and confirmed that the party will contest West Coast GRC regardless of boundary changes.

Singapore Democratic Party (SDP):

- The SDP expressed disappointment over the removal of Yuhua and Bukit Batok SMCs.

- They noted that the boundary changes happened soon after successful fundraising events for the SDP campaign in Bukit Batok.

- The SDP criticized the lack of transparency in the boundary redrawing process, which they claim has been a concern for decades.

- The SDP remains committed to contesting the election with candidates dedicated to holding the Government accountable.

- The SDP will examine the changes and refine their plans accordingly.

- They stated that Singaporeans are struggling with the rising cost of living and lack of meaningful government action beyond providing vouchers.

Overall:

All three opposition parties have indicated that they will review the EBRC report thoroughly and announce their election strategies and potential candidates in due course. The report has led to significant changes in several constituencies, prompting varying reactions from the parties, ranging from disappointment to acceptance.

Key Takeaways:

- The EBRC report has had a significant impact on the upcoming GE2025, prompting the opposition parties to re-evaluate their strategies.

- The WP, PSP, and SDP have each highlighted specific concerns and perspectives on the changes, demonstrating diverse responses to the electoral boundary adjustments.

- The parties are now focused on reviewing the report and making informed decisions regarding their contesting constituencies and potential candidates.
 

vegaspace

Senior Member
Joined
May 16, 2021
Messages
2,029
Reaction score
2,733
chee dinner / lunch donation drive emphasis for Bt Batok fight only---for him only

The problem with SDP is CSJ hogging the limelight at every election. If he wants to build a party and a movement that lasts long after he is retired, it is time to raise the profiles of other candidates.

The Bukit Panjang fight is just as important as Bukit Batok SMC would have been and yet there isn't as much attention on it. SDP should divert all those funds to Bukit Panjang to help Paul Tambyah win.

At the same time, they can get a fresh new face for other potentially winnable areas such as the new Sembawang West SMC.
 

Medicated Oil

Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
147,441
Reaction score
60,910
The more popular opposition parties like WP,PSP and SDP all never reveal their cards at all. They all need to think on how to campaign going based on the 30% hardcore oppo supporter, 40% hardcore Pap and the rest being swing voters...
My lucky guess on their deployment:
(Based on their 2020 campaign and some wild guess.)

WP
- Hougang SMC (1).
- Seng Kang GRC (4), Punggol GRC (4), PR/ C GRC (4).
- Aljunied GRC (5), East Coast GRC (5), MP/BH GRC (5),
Tampines GRC (5).
- 33 candidates.

PSP
- Marymount SMC (1), YCK SMC (1), Pioneer SMC (1), KB SMC (1).
- CCK GRC (4).
- Nee Soon GRC (5), WC/JW GRC (5), Tanjong Pagar GRC (5).
- 23 candidates.

SDP
- Bukit Panjang SMC (1), Jurong Central SMC (1)
- Holland/Bukit Timah GRC (4), M/YT GRC (4)
- JE/BB GRC (5)
- 18 candidates.

It is just a guess and not to be taken seriously or officially.
Some parties may need to recruit more candidates to take part this year.
 
Last edited:

mouserabbit

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2017
Messages
5,974
Reaction score
1,072
My lucky guess on their deployment:
(Based on their 2020 campaign and some wild guess.)

WP
- Hougang SMC (1).
- Seng Kang GRC (4), Punggol GRC (4), PR/ C GRC (4).
- Aljunied GRC (5), East Coast GRC (5), MP/BH GRC (5),
Tampines GRC (5).
- 33 candidates.

PSP
- Mountbatten SMC (1), YCK SMC (1), Pioneer SMC (1), KB SMC (1).
- CCK GRC (4).
- Nee Soon GRC (5), WC/JW GRC (5), Tanjong Pagar GRC (5).
- 23 candidates.

SDP
- Bukit Panjang SMC (1), Jurong Central SMC (1)
- Holland/Bukit Timah GRC (4), M/YT GRC (4)
- JE/BB GRC (5)
- 18 candidates.

It is just a guess and not to be taken seriously or officially.
Some parties may need to recruit more candidates to take part this year.

For PSP, likely they give up yishun. In Nalla's FB (one of their candidates in yishun in GE 2020 but now walking in CCK), someone asked about PSP contesting in yishun and he said they require more manpower and resources.

I would also find it wierd if they gave up Marymount, which they get 45%~ in place for a pap stronghold of Mountbatten.
 

Medicated Oil

Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
147,441
Reaction score
60,910
For PSP, likely they give up yishun. In Nalla's FB (one of their candidates in yishun in GE 2020 but now walking in CCK), someone asked about PSP contesting in yishun and he said they require more manpower and resources.

I would also find it wierd if they gave up Marymount, which they get 45%~ in place for a pap stronghold of Mountbatten.
My guess is based on what they contested in 2020 for PSP and SDP.
My guess for WP is based on surrounding areas and their target in achieving one third of the house members.

Sorry one mistake in my guess.
Should be marymount instead of mountbatten.
 

charleslee1989

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
28,473
Reaction score
9,059
But Dr chee a really revealed he going to contest at bb smc

While WP and PSP continue their ground work out reach as usual

That was when it was a SMC...A GRC changes it up in terms of resources allocation!


My lucky guess on their deployment:
(Based on their 2020 campaign and some wild guess.)

WP
- Hougang SMC (1).
- Seng Kang GRC (4), Punggol GRC (4), PR/ C GRC (4).
- Aljunied GRC (5), East Coast GRC (5), MP/BH GRC (5),
Tampines GRC (5).
- 33 candidates.

PSP
- Mountbatten SMC (1), YCK SMC (1), Pioneer SMC (1), KB SMC (1).
- CCK GRC (4).
- Nee Soon GRC (5), WC/JW GRC (5), Tanjong Pagar GRC (5).
- 23 candidates.

SDP
- Bukit Panjang SMC (1), Jurong Central SMC (1)
- Holland/Bukit Timah GRC (4), M/YT GRC (4)
- JE/BB GRC (5)
- 18 candidates.

It is just a guess and not to be taken seriously or officially.
Some parties may need to recruit more candidates to take part this year.
Well, nomination day will be interesting!
 

dt1002

Member
Joined
Aug 29, 2014
Messages
293
Reaction score
86
Are new citizen allow to form a party? It will be interesting. Different background may have different idea to contribute
 

charleslee1989

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2009
Messages
28,473
Reaction score
9,059
Just having fun with the guess.
Yeah...it is interesting to see lah...


However, I feel sorry for the CECs of WP, PSP and SDP whose hard work over the last 4 years may not translate to votes.
Are new citizen allow to form a party? It will be interesting. Different background may have different idea to contribute
Theoretically yes. If they form a party that passes ROS' checks, then it is fair game.
 

Medicated Oil

Honorary Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2011
Messages
147,441
Reaction score
60,910
Yeah...it is interesting to see lah...

However, I feel sorry for the CECs of WP, PSP and SDP whose hard work over the last 4 years may not translate to votes.

Theoretically yes. If they form a party that passes ROS' checks, then it is fair game.
My guess is still within the areas that they contested in 2020.
WP is the one that will be stretched.
 

freshvibes

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2009
Messages
32,232
Reaction score
7,171
From this

bphOB73.png



To this


51dkBCD.png



 

icebleue

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
13,924
Reaction score
5,879
Are new citizen allow to form a party? It will be interesting. Different background may have different idea to contribute
Need pre-register a party... but then again they can contest under independents...
imagine some chinese new citizen decided to contest as independent... the fun will begin...
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top