"Lee managed to retrieve his device and discarded it and its memory card in his Segar Road public housing block’s rubbish chute. The spycam and incriminating videos were not found or recovered."
He could have admitted in theft instead of destroying evidence right? Since there is no proof but only the cleaner's claim that it's a spy camera. Nobody can proof the content in the sd card and that the camera is in working condition as they were not found or recovered.
Lee, who was unemployed after graduating from the National University of Singapore (NUS) recently, was sentenced to six months' jail on Thursday (Oct 14) on two charges - one for destroying evidence to be used in court and the other for installing equipment used to commit an offence.
Roughly two weeks before the incident in August 2020, Lee purchased a spy camera disguised as a clothing hook from e-commerce site Lazada, according to court documents.
He planned to use it to covertly view men urinating as he had a fetish for such videos. The camera has a memory card slot to enable recordings to be saved.
He would head to the gym at HillV2 mall at different times of the day up to three times a week to install the camera in the men's toilet without being discovered.
"Lee, who works as a client accounts manager at a bank, has lodged an appeal against the sentence. His lawyer Johan Ismail had sought either probation or a mandatory treatment order (MTO) for Lee, whom he said had been suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder due to a traumatic childhood incident."
his lawyer - one of thse bas ta rsd lawyers who will say anything ... am well familiar with these sort -
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.
Please refer to our Terms of Service for more information.