they do actually, with career conversion programme.
the candidate's salary is funded 90% for a few months.
https://www.wsg.gov.sg/home/individ.../career-conversion-programmes-for-individuals
must go for fully funded courses during off work hours.
Analysis of WSG Career Conversion Programmes (CCP) for Individuals Singapore
This analysis examines the provided article "WSG Career Conversion Programmes (CCP) for Individuals" from the website of the Singapore Workforce Development Agency (WSG) for inconsistencies, contradictions, ambiguities, flaws, weasel words, loaded language, data discrepancies, and types of propaganda and fallacies.
1. Inconsistency and Contradiction:
- Eligibility Criteria: The article states that "individuals who have a continuous employment gap of at least two (2) years prior to the programme's commencement will be allowed to apply for CCP job roles similar to their previous jobs." This contradicts the earlier statement that "Career conversion is required" for CCPs. This inconsistency creates confusion about the actual eligibility criteria for individuals with employment gaps.
2. Ambiguity:
- "Substantially Different" Job Roles: The article mentions that the new job role under the CCP should be "substantially different" from previous job roles for new hires. This lacks a clear definition of "substantially different," leaving room for interpretation and potential disputes.
- "Good Prospects" and "Growth Job Roles": The article frequently uses phrases like "good prospects" and "growth job roles" without providing specific metrics or criteria to define these terms. This ambiguity can lead to subjective interpretations and potentially misleading expectations for jobseekers.
3. Flaw:
- Lack of Transparency on Employer Selection: The article mentions that "employer-specific shortlisting processes may apply for different CCPs." However, it does not provide details about the selection criteria or the process, which could raise concerns about fairness and transparency in the program.
4. Weasel Words:
- "Good Prospects": This phrase is a weasel word as it lacks concrete evidence or guarantees about future job opportunities. It creates a positive impression without providing specific details.
- "Industry-Recognized Training": While this phrase suggests high-quality training, it lacks specific information about the accreditation or recognition bodies involved.
5. Loaded Language:
- "Mid-Career Individuals": This phrase implies that individuals are past their prime and need to "convert" their careers, potentially creating a negative connotation for those seeking career changes.
- "Long-Term Unemployed": This term carries a negative stigma and can be perceived as demeaning to individuals who are actively seeking employment.
6. Data Discrepancy:
- Number of Sectors: The article states that CCPs are offered in "around 30 sectors." This vague statement lacks specific details about the sectors covered, making it difficult to assess the program's scope.
7. Propaganda and Fallacy:
- Bandwagon Effect: The article emphasizes the popularity of CCPs by stating that they are "targeted at mid-career individuals" and "help mid-career jobseekers or existing employees reskill." This appeals to the bandwagon effect, suggesting that everyone is participating in the program.
- Appeal to Authority: The article mentions that CCPs are "aligned to Industry Transformation Maps/Jobs Transformation Maps," implying that the program is endorsed by authoritative bodies. This appeal to authority can create a sense of legitimacy and trust.
Conclusion:
The article "WSG Career Conversion Programmes (CCP) for Individuals" contains inconsistencies, ambiguities, flaws, weasel words, loaded language, and uses propaganda and fallacy techniques. These issues can create confusion, mislead jobseekers, and raise concerns about the program's transparency and effectiveness. It is important for WSG to address these issues and provide clearer, more transparent information about the CCP program.