KPC's Inappropriate Content Warnings & Infraction PM Conversations

Status
Not open for further replies.

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
@kaypohchee so you are suggesting through your long essay that all this is [KPC : NOT] made up?

I am simply using interesting extracts from the lawsuit newsletter to provide you the requested Concrete Proof of the ongoing lawsuits ....

I have YET to get on to the Lawsuits proper .... that was only the background info for easier understanding of the lawsuits

How those WEF Elites made use of Deutsche Bank for money laundering etc - getting the German judges to 'cover' their evil acts ....
How the elites transferred the citizens' assets to themselves for a song using the covid lockdowns - the Politicians creating Fear to Control the Populations etc etc etc ...
 
Last edited:

Intrinion

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Dec 15, 2012
Messages
35,880
Reaction score
2,481
I am simply using interesting extracts from the lawsuit newsletter to provide you the requested Concrete Proof of the ongoing lawsuits ....

I have YET to get on to the Lawsuits proper .... that was only the background info for easier understanding of the lawsuits

How those WEF Elites made use of Deutsche Bank for money laundering etc - getting the German judges to 'cover' their evil acts ....
How the elites transferred the citizens' assets to themselves for a song using the covid lockdowns - the Politicians creating Fear to Control the Populations etc etc etc ...
Noted. I have read but I am am not convinced by your links.

Kindly refer to this.
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...st-reliable-despite-commotion-about-ct-values
 

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
Continuation - Part 2
http://enformtk.u-aizu.ac.jp/howard/fuellmich/

Concrete Proof of ongoing Lawsuits

- so can re-instate my thread now since these lawsuits are real n not BS ?

As I said Dr Reiner Fuellmich and his team of legal n medical experts wouldn't want to destroy THEIR own reputations here by pretending to file lawsuits against WEF WHO etc ...


On the lawsuits​

As you will know, a number of institutions and law firms have coordinated worldwide in order to have the courts ascertain the background illustrated above and in order afterwards to demand compensation from the ringleaders and concerns for the many who have been harmed by the Drosten-Test lockdown.

The lawsuits being pursued globally are not uncoordinated – they are largely the result of detailed joint planning by the scientists and lawyers involved. The two facts (i) that the Drosten-Test recommended globally by the WHO cannot detect infection, and (ii) that there are no asymptomatic infections (and therefore no real pandemic, at most a PCR casedemic) are of central importance for the outcome of the lawsuits. These facts will cause the house of cards of the pandemic fraudsters to collapse everywhere.

It also follows that whatever is established in the USA, Canada, Australia, Italy, France etc. in this context, (using the help of witnesses and experts, as well as expert opinions) can also be used as evidence in all other courts of the world.

I. Our PCR test complaint on behalf of Dr. Wodarg and the complaint against Drosten and subsequent complaints​

The complaint is pending at the Regional Court of Berlin under the file number 27 O 436/20. On account of an “oversight” – which we consider very strange – the complaint was only delivered to the opposing party weeks after its submission. It was alleged that the court fees which we had remitted had erroneously been booked as payment for a final settlement of accounts and only when – after our phone call – this "oversight" was put right was the complaint formally delivered. We are now waiting for the opposing party to reply.

The complaint against Drosten is based on the Cease-and-Desist letter to Drosten:

http://bit.ly/3rcnWlB

(Original German version: http://bit.ly/3nrn62b )

The complaint will be completed in the coming days and then, it too, will be submitted to the Regional Court of Berlin. Together with a group of lawyers we are working on a number of further precedence case complaints, but above all (because this is faster and less expensive) also on many cease and desist letters against those in positions of responsibility. This way we obtain in effect something like a German class action. The cease and desist letters ensure that the visible puppets Drosten, Wieler, but also the members of The Leopoldina National Academy of Sciences and others including the individuals who, in their official capacities, bear personal responsibility for imposition of quarantine and similar measures – the cease and desist letters ensure that these people are put under pressure even if, thereafter, the necessary justification of the claims arising from the letters will need many months. In this time, a few of the precedence case lawsuits (which all concern the PCR tests and asymptomatic infections) will proceed by taking evidence (i.e. questioning of ordinary and expert witnesses and the drafting of expertises). Their results can then be used for rulings on the parallel “dormant” proceedings: the lawsuits dormant until this point of time will not be able to come to any other conclusion since the facts will have been established in the parallel precedence cases.

II. PCR test lawsuit in New York​

On December 16, 2020, the US colleagues working with Robert F Kennedy, Jr´s Children’s Health Defense and advised by the same experts as ourselves, submitted a PCR test complaint in New York on behalf of a number of plaintiffs.

Translator’s note: Supplementary information describing the PCR test complaint will be issued shortly as an update to this translation.

III. The Canadian class action, which will develop to be an international class action for all those harmed by the Drosten-PCR-Test-Lockdowns​

In the last week Canadian colleagues working with Michael Swinwood have submitted a class action. It is being added to, on the instructions of the court. The complainants initially represented are Indians, a group of small business people and a representative of disabled people. In contrast to all complaints submitted to date, this complaint narrates briefly the historical background of the power structures behind the Davos clique which have been constructed over the course of centuries.

Translator’s note: Supplementary information describing the class action will be issued shortly as an update to this translation.
The Indians (Algonquin) as a complainant group are of special significance since they – together with the Indians of the USA and Latin America – have for centuries been the object of attempted genocide by the conquerors. In the words of Michael Swinwood, “We are all Indians now.”

TBC
 

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
Part 3 - Continuation

Official Court Link etc ...

https://crlisboa.org/wp/juris/processo-n-o1783-20-7t8pdl-l1-3/


IV. Court rulings from Portugal and Ecuador​

  1. Some weeks ago, an appeal court in Portugal ruled that the PCR tests are not able to ascertain infection let alone illness, which is exactly what the inventor of the PCR tests, the Nobel Prizewinner Kary Mullis repeatedly emphasised - At issue was the case of four German tourists, one of whom had tested positive, and all of whom the authorities had placed under what the court determined to be a kind of house arrest – similar to the action of German administrative courts who follow blindly German fake science; thereby the appeal court confirmed an earlier finding that the quarantine was unconstitutional.
    This judgement is a slap in the face for the German administrative courts, which were forced to concede that PCR tests cannot ascertain the presence of infection but nonetheless – in a case of crass perversion of justice – imagined that they had to follow the instructions of the Robert Koch Institute in its reliance on PCR tests and assumed that the healthcare system was on the brink of being overwhelmed (e.g. Higher Administrative Court Münster) – in this respect the Portuguese judgement demoted the German administrative courts to the status of banana republic. This is the shape of lessons in the rule of law by a Portuguese for a German court (the judgement linked to is in Portuguese so may need professional or machine translation).
    Translator’s note: this english language report on the Portugal case was not included in the Fuellmich newsletter but has been added here to provide further background on the judgement.http://cognitive-liberty.online/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-test-as-unreliable/
  2. A judgement pronounced on January 2, 2021, by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador ruled that all anti-Corona measures to date are based on mere conjectures without any basis in fact. After nine months it should finally be possible for the acting politicians to communicate clear, evidence-based assertions and base their measures on these. But since this has not happened, all the measures are unconstitutional. Below is the link to the judgement (we shall publish the judgement itself in the original on the website of the Corona Committee).
https://ricapod.buzzsprout.com/1409...3VGglPOxC2UCy3Fxfh_tveVRsBUSwFmLkdnsrdCYCwTao

Not one of the German administrative courts ruling on urgent injunctions nor indeed the Federal Constitutional Court have made any such pronouncement for Germany although of course the finding applies equally for Germany. This is a lesson from an Ecuadoran Court in the rule of law for the German courts.

V. Lawsuit to declare void vaccine approval; constitutional complaint by a German judge against the measures of a Federal Government which has practically been kidnapped by the Davos Clique – measures which are destroying democracy and the rule of law​

  1. Parallel to all these efforts, the Italian lawyer Dr. Renate Holzeisen is working with us and experts on a lawsuit against the EU Commission to have its approval of vaccines declared null & void – vaccines which are de facto untested and highly dangerous – in the case of the manufacturers Bioentech/Pfizer and Moderna, these are prohibited genetic experiments on humans. Meanwhile, the superbly versed and hard-hitting anti-Mafia public prosecutors are investigating the WHO and its Italian backers. In France work is progressing on a complaint to the Court for Human Rights.
  2. A German judge (who we are in contact with) has submitted a constitutional complaint against the blanket measures of the Federal Government, these measures undermining democracy and the rule of law; the hope here is that – notwithstanding all concrete appearances – the head of the Constitutional Court has retained his independence. We have published these constitutional complaints on our news website and they can be submitted by anyone.
https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Verfassungsbeschwerde-Richter-anonym-30122020.pdf

We shall continue to keep you up to date about the legal developments, including with videos (although here there is a danger of them being removed from the platform). At the same time we must work on making the true facts known to as many people as possible. We will win because we must win.

Best regards

Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, LL.M.

- Attorney –
 
Last edited:

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
Add-On to Post #53 your use of Dubious Sources etc [this one again attacking IVM] ....

See how non-objective the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) really is ....

https://www.biznews.com/thought-leaders/2021/05/12/mailbox-ivermectin

Ivermectin-1.jpg


Don’t mention Ivermectin; it’ll upset the vaccine rollout​

12th May 2021 by Editor
By Andrew Bannister*

What if there was a cheap drug, so old its patent had expired, so safe that it’s on the WHO’s lists of Essential and Children’s Medicines, and used in mass drug administration rollouts? What if it can be taken at home with the first signs COVID symptoms, given to those in close contact, and significantly reduce COVID disease progression and cases, and far fewer few people would need hospitalisation?

The international vaccine rollout under Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) would legally have to be halted. For an EUA to be legal, “there must be no adequate, approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing or treating the disease or condition.” The vaccines would only become legal once they passed level 4 trials and that certainly won’t happen in 2021.


This would present a major headache for the big public health agencies led by the WHO. The vaccine rollout, outside of trials, would become illegal. The vaccine manufactures, having spent hundreds of million dollars developing and testing vaccines during a pandemic, would not see the $100bn they were expecting in 2021. In a pandemic, and for the next one, we need big pharma to react quickly, and the best way to that, is to reward them financially. Allowing any existing drug, at this time, well into stage 3 trials, to challenge the legality of the EUA of vaccines, is not going to happen easily. On the 31st of March 2021, the WHO recommended against the use of Ivermectin for COVID treatment, citing safety and lack of large RCT proof.

The question of why the WHO would do this is difficult to answer, only if you ignore the importance of the legality of the EUA, and the time tested advice, of following the money. The WHO, a once noble organisation funded by the worlds countries, now receives less than 20% of its budget from member states. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second biggest sponsor after the USA. The GAVI Alliance, a private/public organisation promoting vaccines, was founded by Gates, and now pushing for vaccine passports, are the 4th biggest sponsor to WHO. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director-General, served on the GAVI board for several years. The WHO, in 2021 changed the definition of “herd immunity”, to occurring only when the global population has been vaccinated.

The WHO has either made serious mistakes in their analysis or deliberately undermined Ivermectin and other early treatment drugs, in favour of vaccinating the world. Obviously this is a huge windfall for vaccine manufacturers, with Pfizer set to receive over a trillion rand from vaccines over the next five years according to Morgan Stanley.

In January this year, the several months long, Ivermectin research, meta-analysis of Randomised Control Trials (RCT), commissioned by WHO was released. The paper showed that Ivermectin reduces death by 74% and is 85% effective as prophylaxis. The trial leader, Dr Andrew Hill, was on Zoom meetings saying that governments should secure their source before demand outstrips supply and that it would be immoral, not to roll it out. The same month, two other independent, unsponsored meta-analysis confirmed a similar range of effectiveness at various stages of the disease. While effective at all stages of the disease, Ivermectin is most effective as a prophylaxis and about 80% in early treatment, depending on dose used.

The WHO currently have no advice or recommendation’s for early treatment apart from recommending against self-medication. If you don’t heal in the first week, when symptoms are generally mild, by the time you have to go to the hospital with breathing problems, your chances of dying have increased significantly. The use of Ivermectin and other repurposed drugs, could prevent that. As its safer than paracetamol, it should be available over the counter. As is happening in Mexico City and some states in India, anyone testing positive or feeling sick should take it, and give it to those they are in close contact with. It may be possible, if you want to attend a large social event or travel in a plane, that you take a pill, four hours before, and you will have significant protection for a few days. Lockdowns could end.

Ivermectin has been used in humans for 35 years and over 4 billion doses have been administered. Merck, the original patent holder, donated 3.7 billion doses to developing countries. 2015 the two individuals who developed Ivermectin were awarded a Nobel Prize for medicine. While known primarily as an anti-parasitic, Ivermectin has powerful anti-viral and anti-inflammatory properties. Its safety is documented at doses twenty times the normal. Only 19 deaths are known and side-affects are generally mild and short. As a comparison, approximately 450 US citizens die from paracetamol every year.
 
Last edited:

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
Continuation


Merck’s patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996 and they produce less than 5% of global supply. In 2020 they were asked to assist in Nigerian and Japanese trials but declined both. In 2021 Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against Covid-19 and bizarrely claimed, “A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies” of the a drug they donated to be distributed in mass rollouts, by primary care workers, in mass campaigns, to millions in developing countries. The media reported the Merck statement as a blinding truth without looking at the conflict of interests when days later, Merck received $356m from the US government to develop an investigational therapeutic. The WHO even quoted Merck, as evidence, that it didn’t work, in their recommendation against the use of Ivermectin. It’s a dangerous world when corporate marketing determines public health policy. Global vaccine rollout, to everyone, is the policy.

The vaccine rollout is worth about $100bn in 2021, and there may well be annual updates to deal with new variants of COVID. The WHO answers to nobody but its’ funders. Less than 20% of its budget comes member states, the bulk coming from other sources. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest sponsor of the organisation. GAVI, a vaccine alliance, founded by Gates and WHO Director General Tedros Ghebreyesus, served on its board prior to his current position, is the fifth largest contributor.

In March 2021, WHO said that Ivermectin was not recommend for the treatment of COVID outside of trials. They did this by ignoring their own months long, in-depth investigation by Dr Andrew Hill, that found Ivermectin was associated with 74% reduction in fatalities, and replaced it with a hastily done analysis that cherry picked from five, seven or sixteen trials (the report contradicts itself) but only cite 5 trails. The figures ,the WHO report supplies, show a reduction of death by 81%, but with a “very low certainty of evidence”. The WHO report didn’t even mention prophylaxis, where Ivermectin’s most effective, saying that fell outside its mandate. The WHO will not approve Ivermectin’s use, without it first proving itself in a large RCT. These trials cost millions and nobody, except those with a financial interest in vaccines, have offered to fund. The WHO are best placed to run large RCT’s on existing drugs, but haven’t done so with Ivermectin, despite it being over a year, since Ivermectin was proved to kill COVID in a lab. As only big pharma can afford the large RCT, the only drugs that go through the large RCT’s, are the new ones developed by big pharma, and become the only ones approved by WHO.

Almost every media house around the world has contributed to the marginalisation of Ivermectin. No mainstream journalists have investigated the evidence or questioned and debated scientists supporting it. It’s called an “animal drug” and dangerous. Ivermectin is seen as a repeat of hydroxychloroquine and not to be taken seriously. Belief in it, worthy only of derision.

On 10 December 2020, at the World Press Freedom Conference, an extension to the Trusted News Initiative (TNI) was announced. Founded to prevent false information around elections, the TNI, whose members are leading media houses: AP, AFP, BBC, CBC, European broadcast Union, Facebook, Financial Times, First Draft, Google, YouTube, The Hindu, Microsoft, Reuters, Twitter and Washington Post, were now extending that to vaccines. In a surprisingly underreported event, many of the world’s biggest media, agreed to promote the global vaccine rollout and focus on combatting the spread of harmful vaccine disinformation. While noble and well-intended, this has unfortunately led to a media silence on promising, early treatments that could significantly drop hospitalisations.

The March this year, New York Times broke a story, repeated around the world, reporting a trial that proved “Ivermectin had no effect”. The Lopez-Medina trial, published in JAMA, a leading medical journal, was held as the gold standard for Ivermectin RCT’s. In the trial, reminiscent of a “big tobacco” hit-job, vaccine manufactures paid the researchers (documented in the papers Conflicts Of Interests section). There are many faults in the trial. Among them, they accidentally gave Ivermectin to both arms of the trial and changed the trials primary outcome, mid-trial, three times. Normally, nobody would pay a trial any attention after these significant problems. As the trial was on a young heathy population, in an area with high Ivermectin use, freely available from the mayor during their first COVID wave, you were allowed on the trial if you hadn’t taken Ivermectin for 5 days, despite it’s effects being noticeable up to a month after a single dose. Surprisingly less than 3% of the participants had disease progression, against an expectation of 18%. The rare but specific Ivermectin side effect, blurred vision, was within 0,3% (11.3/11.6%) of both groups as were other side effects. The results were collected telephonically and no physical examination was done. From their result, with surprisingly few people having disease progression (some suggest that the trial inadvertently proves Ivermectin’s efficiency), it’s not possible to arrive at the conclusion that Ivermectin doesn’t work, which is what they did, and the media bought it.

Unless you know where to look, you will find hardly any positive information on Ivermectin. Social media makes it very difficult to say anything positive about it without the poster getting blocked from the platforms for lengthy periods. YouTube has made the promotion of Ivermectin, a violation of its policies. There is no public conversation in the media about it. It’s just ignored. Respectable medical journals are sitting with piles of Ivermectin papers on their desks that they refuse to publish without providing reason, despite at least one of them having passed peer review by two FDA reviewers. The book “Manufacturing of Consent” comes to mind where Chomsky and Herman look at how mass media serves the rich. It’s a David against Goliath fight, a cheap generic vs Big Pharma.

There are now 27 RCT’s, about 7 meta -analysis and many observational trials, that show Ivermectin works. There is very little evidence that it doesn’t work. The WHO were very sparse in detail and process, in their recommendation against its use. New research from the All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS), on a group of over 3500 health care workers, using two doses of Ivermectin as prophylactic, reduced cases among health care workers by 83% in the following month. Mexico City has for several months been using a test and treat with Ivermectin strategy. A research paper by Mexico City Health, claims that, depending on dosing, they have reduced hospitalisations by 56-73%. India in its current destructive wave, has just taken the example set by its two most successful states, and authorised the use of Ivermectin in early treatment. Doctors who use it, swear by it. As for more proof, the Gates/Together trial is ongoing, but given Gates’s large investments in vaccines, its results, already mistrusted. In Goa they have just authorised giving Ivermectin to everyone who tests, not waiting for a result. If Ivermectin works, it should soon be clearly seen unless the “Ivermectin is dangerous” group wins. We need more studies, especially on higher dosing, but we know it’s safe, so no need to wait.

Ultimately what this means, is that if Ivermectin and other repurposed drugs (like the promising anti-depressant Fluvoxamine), work for early treatment, you won’t have to use a vaccine, that’s still in trial, with unknown long-term safety or ability to treat future variants, and for which, the manufactures accept no liability.

In case you get sick, keep Ivermectin close by for early, household treatment, and you will prevent viral replication early and almost certainly, avoid hospital. You would have also built an immune response that will provide natural protection against future infections. Its wide-spread use, should dampen waves of disease, while vaccines can use this time to prove themselves, with long term safety and efficiency.
  • Andrew Bannister says “I can provide proof for everything I have written” and was last published 30 years ago in the medical journal Lancet.

KPC : My Point being - YOUR Credible Non-Dubious Sources may well NOT be credible nor objective compared to the so-called Dubious Sources (the Media Davids)
 

MikeDirnt78

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
47,621
Reaction score
8,163
Yo KPC. In case you are not aware. This is a feedback section.

Not for you to spam propaganda or conspiracy theories.

I thought you already have a thread in EDMW? Just post there lah.
 

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
Yo KPC. In case you are not aware. This is a feedback section.

Not for you to spam propaganda or conspiracy theories.


I thought you already have a thread in EDMW? Just post there lah.

My apologies

I'm NOT doing that lah

I'm hoping (in my long-winded WOTY/Essay Way with lots of supporting examples etc) to try explaining to Intrinion WHY his use of "Dubious Sources" or "Conspiracy Theories" as the purported Reasons for Post Deletion etc NOT good nor sufficient reason to do so there
 

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
Noted. I have read but I am am not convinced by your links.

Kindly refer to this.
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...st-reliable-despite-commotion-about-ct-values

I will not bother to pursue on with the PCR Test issue at this time as I find it rather dry n technical - not interesting enough for me to want to wade thru' the material
Think will just leave it to Reiner Fuellmich & Team to do THEIR work there bah

Hmmm really don't know which link then before you are finally satisfied ....
Be fair to the poor Davids against the rich Goliaths
Think I have already produced enough evidence that suits have been filed

Not dailyexpose.uk nor eutimes

Not https://albertapressleader.ca/?p=32211

This below should satisfy you - to re-instate thread ?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/sudbury/covid-pandemic-lawsuits-ontario-1.5897317

Ontario courts expected to be busy with COVID lawsuits long after pandemic​

Provincial law to head off civil lawsuits tied to COVID first has to be tested in court​


Erik White · CBC News · Posted: Feb 03, 2021 5:00 AM ET | Last Updated: February 4

Even when the pandemic is finally behind us, Ontario's courts will likely be dealing with COVID-19 lawsuits for years to come.

There are already some suits filed claiming wrongful deaths in long-term care homes, a lack of disability coverage for so-called COVID "long haulers" with lingering symptoms and a class action suit claiming the government's masking laws are violating constitutional rights.

A class action suit filed by Ottawa lawyer Michael Swinwood is going even further.

"It's a challenge to what is being put before humanity," he says.

"We're saying straight up that there is no justification for the declaration of a pandemic ... I'd go so far as to say that what medical science says is that this is no worse than a seasonal flu."

michael-swinwood.JPG

Ottawa lawyer Michael Swinwood is behind a class action lawsuit claiming that the Canadian and Ontario governments don't have the "lawful authority" to impose COVID restrictions on the public. (Micki Cowan/CBC)

The suit is filed against the Canadian and Ontario governments, individual political leaders, as well as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Health Organization and the Pope.

It claims that all the defendants allowed for the bringing in of COVID restrictions and shutdowns "without lawful authority and due process on behalf of the mind, body and health of the Canadian Public."

The class of Ontario claimants includes the owner of a convenience store in Henvey Inlet First Nation south of Sudbury, a small business owner in Peterborough, a man living with disabilities in Balderson and a single mother in downtown Toronto.

Each is seeking $1 million, as are the likely millions of "John and Jane Does" named in the suit representing everyone else affected by the pandemic.

Swinwood says he expects the governments will claim the suit is "frivolous and vexatious" but "that doesn't matter, the facts are all there."

The Ontario government is trying to limit COVID lawsuits, with a law passed in November forbidding claims against employers and others who make an "honest effort" to follow guidelines and prevent spread of the virus.

Elizabeth Keenan— an employment lawyer with Matthews, Dinsdale and Clark in Toronto— says what exactly that means is "the big question" that will have to be tested in court.

"One would imagine that there's a purpose in using that language," she says.

But Keenan says workers can still file COVID-related Workplace Safety Insurance Board claims against their employers and those who lost work during the shutdown are already starting to file for what's called a "constructive dismissal" in hopes of getting severance pay.

"We anticipate a flurry of those actions," she says.

"I think we're going to feel the repercussions of this for a long while."

Toronto personal injury lawyer and York University law professor Joseph Campisi says he expects a range of different suits to come after the pandemic.

"The next major hurdle will be actually getting in front of a judge," he says

"The backlog is significant before you even get into a court to have your case heard."

While some cases have been heard in courtrooms and online during the past 11 months, many have been delayed.

The province is not allowing any jury trials until mid-May at the earliest and civil lawsuits are likely to get priority after criminal and family law matters.

Erik White is a CBC journalist based in Sudbury. He covers a wide range of stories about northern Ontario. Connect with him on Twitter @erikjwhite. Send story ideas to erik.white@cbc.ca
 
Last edited:

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
59,066
Reaction score
3,746
My apologies

I'm NOT doing that lah

I'm hoping (in my long-winded WOTY/Essay Way with lots of supporting examples etc) to try explaining to Intrinion WHY his use of "Dubious Sources" or "Conspiracy Theories" as the purported Reasons for Post Deletion etc NOT good nor sufficient reason to do so there
doesn't seem to be working.
 

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
@kaypohchee I know you will be posting queries as to why you have received two infractions

You have received the two infractions for the following reason:

Globally all governments and health care experts are advocating for vaccination.


Your posts and advocation of non vaccinating (KPC -Where ?) is highly irresponsible especially when we are in the midst of this pandemic.

Please refer to an alternate view and rebuttal of your posted claims:

https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...nce/doomsday-prophecy-dr-geert-vanden-bossche
https://factcheck.afp.com/mass-covid-19-vaccination-will-not-lead-out-control-variants

1) Thursday at 7:17 PM

You have received a warning at www.hardwarezone.com.sg.

Your post (Changi Airport, 4-5 Hospitals clusters with vaccinated staffs. Vaccines needs more questioning?) has resulted in a warning worth 3 points. Your account's access may be limited based on these actions. Please keep this in mind when posting or using our site.

Kindly read this for an alternate view: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...nce/doomsday-prophecy-dr-geert-vanden-bossche
teddy123 said:
Virus mutate faster than medical research

Mankind is doomed
That is bc of Ignoring Geert's Warnings against Mass Vaccinations in the middle of a pandemic

End up with Immune Escape n more infectious variants that attack even healthy young etc



2) Thursday at 7:19 PM

You have received a warning at www.hardwarezone.com.sg.

Your post (May 13 Hari Raya - Already 5 Hospitals infected with Covid liau) has resulted in a warning worth 3 points. Your account's access may be limited based on these actions. Please keep this in mind when posting or using our site
Kindly read this for an alternate view: https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/c...nce/doomsday-prophecy-dr-geert-vanden-bossche
Newsman said:
Awaiting cases from Other Hospitals

Something is very wrong when there are more cases amongst Vaccinated people than with unvaccinated ones.

I am sure the Hospital CEOs all cannot sleep properly.
That is from IGNORING Geert's Warnings lor

NOT to mass vaccinate in the midst of ongoing pandemic !!



Can I request that these 6 points be Removed OR Reduced Accordingly since this is my 1st Warnings on posts of the SAME NATURE occurring WITHIN 2 MINUTES of each other - essentially for my possessing a Non-Experimental EUA Vaccination Cautious Rational Stance here in the light of my knowledge concerning Geert's Warnings on the dangers of mass vaccinating in the midst of an ongoing pandemic & my own prior misgivings of taking a still-experimental EUA no-liability jab here !

Pls confirm my current Infraction Point Tally too. TY !

I know better now and will take care to post in a more safe general "indefinite wishy-washy 'maybe' 'I think' 'might be true' ?" way - I will ALSO attach that mcgill link whenever I need to make mention of Geert's Warnings in my Future postings too. I take comfort that more forummers are awakened and posting their own questioning threads/posts here
[but why am I the targetted one ??]

As seen above I did not ask anyone Not to Vaccinate !
I'd simply mentioned/attributed possible cause to Geert's Warning being manifested there


My aim in my postings is to create awareness and to urge readers to Think Critically for Themselves of the issues under discussion ...

Whether THEY also want to follow MY own decision not to vaxx in the meantime is SOLELY THEIR Own Decision to make too .... no ???
Pls note that in those 2 posts I had not mention I was NOT going to vaccinate too

How sure are YOU
that all these governments and health care experts have REALLY considered ALL ASPECTS of the Safety Issues and are not simply 'blindly' following corrupt evil WHO FDA CDC GAVI Bill Gates Fauci Big Pharma etc in this Mad Mass Vaccination Rush and convinced by the "Benefits outweigh the UNKNOWN RISKS argument" - I'm Not !
And you CAN'T PENALIZE Me for holding/sharing such Legitimate Points of View can you ???

eg For one the UK gov leaders have been accused of Pandemic Fraud - apart from the earlier "Nuremberg2 Trial" for Crimes Against Humanity led by Dr Reiner Fuellmich
which you now acknowledge is NOT some fake conspiracy theory and I am now permitted to post on it




As the Great Reset Build Back Better Agendas manifest themselves esp in certain countries, I'm able to see for myself that it's true and not some simple Conspiracy Theory after all - as it's so obvious n well-coordinated n
well-documented by WEF which makes no attempts at concealment etc ....
Their huge monopolies etc
I am reminded of the well-coordinated global sudden "Keto Crotch Campaign" 2 years back against the LCHF Camp brought by these same crowd of Anti-Meat WEF Davos Elites ....
I was able to 'connect the various dots' here

What if Geert was right after all - with the more infectious variants etc he seems to be accurate there ... no ? Even well respected experts like Dr. Peter McCullough believe in Innate Immunity n such etc ....

I'm all for Alternate Views being presented in good faith (but have my innate distain for "bought-over non-objective" fact-checkers acting NOT on good faith] - but sadly not much earnest discussion n true debate here ....

I'm ADDING this very Thought-Provoking short video clip which addresses the very issue of being "fact-checked by Facebook" with their "independent" Fact-Checker Lead Stories (experts ?) claiming that Geert is a HOAX [next-level fake news being weaponised etc !] - I hope you are able to distinguish n digest the very VALID Points raised there by Bret Weinstein on his soap box !


Facebook 'warns' us against Geert Vanden Bossch podcast (from Livestream #77) 4 May 2021​

DarkHorse is fact checked by Facebook. Clip with Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying. Reference: https://youtu.be/BNyAovuUxro
Clip taken from DarkHorse Podcast Livestream #77 (originally streamed live on April 24, 2021): https://youtu.be/0VtiU9bWAVw


Well we'll have to let the course of nature decide how this pandemic pans out then if no sane steps are taken to intervene etc ....

...........................................................................

For the record :

Your post in the thread KPC : Ivermectin Approved for Covid19 Use in South Africa was edited. Reason: If it’s personal medication then there is no need for you to continually announce it, unless you want a report to be made by other users to relevant authorities etc.
14 May at 10:54 AM

TY - I appreciate the non-deletion there !
 
Last edited:

MikeDirnt78

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2002
Messages
47,621
Reaction score
8,163
My apologies

I'm NOT doing that lah

I'm hoping (in my long-winded WOTY/Essay Way with lots of supporting examples etc) to try explaining to Intrinion WHY his use of "Dubious Sources" or "Conspiracy Theories" as the purported Reasons for Post Deletion etc NOT good nor sufficient reason to do so there

You must understand this.

When you pose conspiracy theories of let's say about China or US, there is possibly no harm to the general public.

But when you pose conspiracy theories or unapproved medications, there is potential harm to the general public.

So please understand the seriousness of your actions.
 

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
You must understand this.

When you pose conspiracy theories of let's say about China or US, there is possibly no harm to the general public.

But when you pose conspiracy theories or unapproved medications, there is potential harm to the general public.

So please understand the seriousness of your actions.

Now THAT is the general mainstream establishment Don't Rock the Boat type thinking

Think Out of the Box instead when the potential BENEFITS (rather than your alleged Harm) should be made known to the public in order for them to lobby for some sane action
eg the use of safe cheap IVM etc etc to be made available as a prophylaxis too OUTSIDE clinical use as a quick way to control "end" the covid crisis here

There are already LOTS of medical experts (except maybe for our kiasu toe-lining local ones ??) who See the Light using IVM etc to truly save their patients ....

Why not IGNORE corrupt evil WHO FDA CDC etc (with their own fraudulently-obtained EUA vaccines + vaccine roll out agendas etc) and do the Sane Right Action of heeding the call of These Frontline Medical Experts to use IVM etc ?

Btw IVM is far safer than even Panadol - there are comparative studies on that n mentioned in Dr John Campbell's latest video ! So we can put to rest its purported "non-safety issue" of an excuse not to use it once n for all !
 
Last edited:

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
59,066
Reaction score
3,746
Now THAT is the general mainstream establishmemt Don't Rock the Boat type thinking

Think Out of the Box instead when the potential BENEFITS (rather than your alleged Harm) should be made known to the public in order for them to lobby for some sane action
eg the use of safe cheap IVM etc etc to be made available as a prophylaxis too OUTSIDE clinical use as a quick way to control "end" the covid crisis here

There are already LOTS of medical experts (except maybe for our kiasu toe-lining local ones ??) who See the Light using IVM etc to truly save their patients ....

Why not IGNORE corrupt evil WHO FDA CDC etc (with their own fraudulently-obtained EUA vaccines + vaccine roll out agendas etc) and do the Sane Right Action of heeding the call of These Frontline Medical Experts to use IVM etc ?

Btw IVM is far safer than even Panadol - there are comparative studies on that n mentioned in Dr John Campbell's latest video ! So we can put to rest its non-safety issue once n for all !
somehow people disagree with you? so may be either you accept it and move on, or you can continue to post and you just accept the consequences?
 

Intrinion

Senior Moderator
Senior Moderator
Joined
Dec 15, 2012
Messages
35,880
Reaction score
2,481
Thanks .... but can re-instate original thread with discussion posts ?

then I just add-on the videos and articles etc ...
No. I will not be reinstating it. I have explained why.

If they are ongoing law suits, posted by reliable news sources such as the Canadian broadcasting channel or public court documentations from respective courts, then this is permitted. But please, post it on a separate thread and not this user support thread.
 

kaypohchee

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2005
Messages
15,493
Reaction score
600
somehow people disagree with you? so may be either you accept it and move on, or you can continue to post and you just accept the consequences?
Of course I cannot expect others to agree 100% with me

But in important issues or matters that count like in my SHARING n Creating Awareness etc, I will continue to work towards Better Acceptance here
Ie in trying towards the 90+% Agreement Target

Or at the very very least
To get my KPC-Haters etc to accept that there ARE other views different from those They Hold too
That they be intellectually mentally mature n NOT hit the Report Button as a Reflex Action to MY posts

Basically to Agree to Disagree in a civil fashion without dismissing our alternative views as being Fake News or Conspiracy Theories or from Dubious Source n the like there ....
 
Last edited:

PikaPika33

Honorary Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2016
Messages
139,961
Reaction score
22,281
Just pban ip ban this big pharma conspiracy theories nutcase siao lang troll. Best is lock up in imh.
Just want to go against the norm, sharing random twitter without reading and knowing and checking.
Last time is diet now is everything against the government.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
59,066
Reaction score
3,746
Of course I cannot expect others to agree 100% with me

But in important issues or matters that count like in my SHARING n Creating Awareness etc, I will continue to work towards Better Acceptance here
Ie in trying towards the 90+% Agreement Target

Or at the very very least
To get my KPC-Haters etc to accept that there ARE other views different from those They Hold too

Basically to Agree to Disagree in a civil fashion without dismissing our alternative views as being Fake News or Conspiracy Theories or from Dubious Source n the like there ....
You certainly can. just that you have to live with the likelihood that your post might be deleted and you you being infracted.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top