dannytan87
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2011
- Messages
- 56,983
- Reaction score
- 2,482
Should sue the outsource coy..... Cognizant HCl or wadever for millions then take the money compensate back to the customer
It's their fault for releasing the fund and not detecting anomaly......Not entirely their fault but they can definitely handle the situation better
I has to be their fault partially, if it isn’t then why would they implement such measures after this incident?those voted YES are noobs ...
Maybe some suggestions of how to strengthen. After they strengthen, some people will write in to say too many layers of protection, cumbersome process, can banks look into simplifying. Here we go again.Both are at faults.
OCBC could have stopped it earlier.
MAS and banks could have strengthened the security protocols.
Is not strengthen everything petty sum like under 100 dun need strengthen...... Unless consecutive 50 times 100....Maybe some suggestions of how to strengthen. After they strengthen, some people will write in to say too many layers of protection, cumbersome process, can banks look into simplifying. Here we go again.
Cos the scammers impersonated the bank, ... conned the account holders into giving details to facilitate them to impersonate the account holders to con the bank into executing the transactions under the impression that they were the ‘instructions of the account holders’?OCBC fault. How can let scammer take money out from the account holder?
Needles never poke their flesh so they won’t field painIm shocked people here can blame the victims. Scammer trf the money without otp notification triggered is their fault?
just hope your aged relatives dont fall victim cause you would be singing a diff tune then
iPhone fault lah33.33% stupid user fault
33.33% ocbc fault
33.33% telco fault for divert sms hack
Have. PapDefinitely partial blame.
Nobody is faultless in this saga
You steel want to say 風涼話?Ownself stupid but blame others are the worst.
So what would be the threshold? Who decides? MAS? Bank? Consumer? I am not sure everyone’s risk threshold?Is not strengthen everything petty sum like under 100 dun need strengthen...... Unless consecutive 50 times 100....
But sum more then 50 percent is anomaly
This can also be data analytics data science... User past data can detect anomaly.... Like usual month is xfer 1k around monthly for the pass 10 month.... This month 50k.So what would be the threshold? Who decides? MAS? Bank? Consumer? I am not sure everyone’s risk threshold?