[POLL] Do you think it is OCBC fault?

Issit ocbc fault

  • Yes

    Votes: 202 62.3%
  • No

    Votes: 122 37.7%

  • Total voters
    324

dannytan87

Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
56,983
Reaction score
2,482
Should sue the outsource coy..... Cognizant HCl or wadever for millions then take the money compensate back to the customer
 

Sauron

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2001
Messages
19,485
Reaction score
5,230
Surprising 63% (so far) thinks it's the banks fault.
 

noname2016

Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2016
Messages
7,196
Reaction score
5,282
I was looking through my Ocbc sms and realized that I didn’t receive any warning sms not to click on suspicious links on Dec 23. I only received on Dec 30 and Jan 5.

but Ocbc said they send out warning sms on Dec 23.. did they really send to all customers?
“OCBC added that it sent out its first media advisory on Dec. 23 to warn of a surge in these scams
It also sent out a second advisory on Dec. 30, to warn of a potential surge in attacks over the New Year weekend”
 

dannytan87

Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
56,983
Reaction score
2,482
Not entirely their fault but they can definitely handle the situation better
It's their fault for releasing the fund and not detecting anomaly......

People have spending behaviors and sudden big sums xfer should be detect as anomaly.......

Should have a sms message...... U r about to xfer 1000000 dollar please reply yes to proceed ....... Are u sure to proceed with this xfer.....
 

Nicholas92

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
11,269
Reaction score
3,002
iPhone / Safari / Chrone fault la

how come never block the phishing website?
 

Tuckie

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
24,516
Reaction score
1,037
Both are at faults.

OCBC could have stopped it earlier.

MAS and banks could have strengthened the security protocols.
Maybe some suggestions of how to strengthen. After they strengthen, some people will write in to say too many layers of protection, cumbersome process, can banks look into simplifying. Here we go again.
 

PippingCafe

Master Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
4,939
Reaction score
2,437
Overseas addition of payee should have a 24 hr lockup period before money can be sent.
 

Lafiel

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Messages
12,074
Reaction score
847
33.33% stupid user fault
33.33% ocbc fault
33.33% telco fault for divert sms hack
 

dannytan87

Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
56,983
Reaction score
2,482
Maybe some suggestions of how to strengthen. After they strengthen, some people will write in to say too many layers of protection, cumbersome process, can banks look into simplifying. Here we go again.
Is not strengthen everything petty sum like under 100 dun need strengthen...... Unless consecutive 50 times 100....

But sum more then 50 percent is anomaly
 

Capitalist

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2006
Messages
39,150
Reaction score
5,050
OCBC fault. How can let scammer take money out from the account holder?
Cos the scammers impersonated the bank, ... conned the account holders into giving details to facilitate them to impersonate the account holders to con the bank into executing the transactions under the impression that they were the ‘instructions of the account holders’? :s13:
 

ramlee

High Honorary Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
159,622
Reaction score
54,142
Im shocked people here can blame the victims. Scammer trf the money without otp notification triggered is their fault?

just hope your aged relatives dont fall victim cause you would be singing a diff tune then
Needles never poke their flesh so they won’t field pain :(
 

Tuckie

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
24,516
Reaction score
1,037
Is not strengthen everything petty sum like under 100 dun need strengthen...... Unless consecutive 50 times 100....

But sum more then 50 percent is anomaly
So what would be the threshold? Who decides? MAS? Bank? Consumer? I am not sure everyone’s risk threshold?
 

dannytan87

Banned
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
56,983
Reaction score
2,482
So what would be the threshold? Who decides? MAS? Bank? Consumer? I am not sure everyone’s risk threshold?
This can also be data analytics data science... User past data can detect anomaly.... Like usual month is xfer 1k around monthly for the pass 10 month.... This month 50k.

Anomaly is just unusual from the normal past data....... Just get a double confirmation with anomaly..... Do you wish to proceed xfer 50k question.....
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top