Hi all, planning my parent's retirement and was considering SSB. But seeing the current interest rate is ~2% for 10Y wait, would it make more sense to place the money in retirement account and earning 4% interest?
Anyway my parents met FRS and
can withdraw anything above the BRS amount
SSBs are attractive for what they are. But if your parents already have enough liquidity — enough to handle a new $1,000 refrigerator if theirs breaks, to pick an example — then CPF RA is the better overall deal. Boosting their RAs means they get more lifelong monthly retirement income. The effective expected yield is substantially higher than current SSBs.
However, if you're concerned about their liquidity, there are a couple better deals available:
1. "All three account" Voluntary Contributions to their CPF accounts would yield >2.5% since some portion would land in their Special Accounts (4.0% interest). This works particularly well if their MediSave Accounts have reached their Basic Healthcare Sums since that portion of the VC would bounce into their OAs. Since they've met the FRS every dollar (except any dollars landing in MA) would be liquid. (MA dollars are only liquid for MediSave purposes.) That beats the current SSB. "All three account" VCs must fit within the CPF Annual Limit. If they're retired and have no compulsory CPF contributions then the full CPF Annual Limit of $37,740 per year per person is available.
2. OA repayment. That'd yield a flat 2.5%. That's very slightly less than the 2.53% yield on the current SSB, but you only get 2.53% on the SSB if you hold it for the full 10 years. And the SSB's interest payouts are "backloaded."
Note also that if you (and any other children, for example) have already set aside a "sufficient" amount for your own retirements in your CPF accounts then you can transfer OA dollars into their RAs. In other words you don't necessarily need unrestricted cash to boost their RAs. You may be able to tap your OA instead. And this works very well right now, actually, since OA at 2.5% is somewhat less attractive for you since you have a longer time horizon.
Consider this scenario, for example:
(a) You (and siblings, if applicable) transfer OA dollars into their RAs instead of cash. (You still maintain sufficient emergency reserve, inclusive of any OA dollars you want to retain for paying your mortgage.)
(b) You instead take your spare cash and prudently invest it in long-term vehicles for your retirement, such as a low cost stock index fund. You wouldn't
plan to tap these invested dollars any time soon (before retirement), but in a dire emergency you could — they'd still be liquid.
That
should be a very winning formula. Note also that if the recipient of your OA transfer were to die too early then his/her CPF nominee(s) would receive whatever is left over in cash. In other words the OA dollars could bounce right back out as unrestricted cash, free to invest again. So in this formula you upgrade OA dollars to RA/CPF LIFE performance (yes, good), and you upgrade some cash to long-term global stock index performance (yes, also good). And your net liquidity is unaffected. Seems like a great combination to me.