Singapore Savings Bonds

lzydata

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
5,978
Reaction score
2,225
Today (29 Jun 905am) ST published news article on SSB 2.71% "highest since 2015" .. luckily they only published after applications closed.. otherwise maybe maybe everyone will get less than $18k... :s13:

https://www.straitstimes.com/busine...ar-average-return-hits-271-highest-since-2015
This article is very strange, reporting 2.71% as news even though the rates were all announced on 1 June, and after the application period for the same SSB closed so that any reader cannot do anything about it. But it is fine since MAS had already published an announcement of the rates in the newspaper.

Zaobao seems more familiar with SSB and what is going on. The real news was the record amount applied, and the next SSB to come.
 

havetheveryfun

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
26,294
Reaction score
3,421
This article is very strange, reporting 2.71% as news even though the rates were all announced on 1 June, and after the application period for the same SSB closed so that any reader cannot do anything about it. But it is fine since MAS had already published an announcement of the rates in the newspaper.

Zaobao seems more familiar with SSB and what is going on. The real news was the record amount applied, and the next SSB to come.
not strange la.. just reporter trying to clock his article count haha
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,119
Reaction score
3,014
Periodic reminder: nominal interest rates don't matter. Only real interest rates do. Singapore dollar inflation is running at 5.4% at last report (Singapore's CPI, April to April, year on year). If Singapore dollar inflation is similar or even fairly substantially lower than the last reported annual inflation rate then the next SSB (and current SSB) will have negative real interest rates.

Yes, OK, if you're using (a reasonable amount of) SSBs for emergency cash reserves (for emergency month #2 onward), that's fine. And/or for a specific large spending objective a couple years from now, such as a down payment on a home or a university tuition bill. A less negative (but still negative) real interest rate might be the best you can do in these circumstances. But SSBs are NOT designed to be long-term investment vehicles. Even the government will tell you that.

I was much more excited/interested in SSBs at slightly lower nominal interest rates back circa 2019, and I told you so in so many words. Those were better deals with about 3 years of low inflation ahead, still for the roles that SSBs are designed to play. Today? "Eh." Nominal rates are "high" precisely because inflation expectations are "high." I think we'll see that 5.4% inflation rate come down, but if forced to predict I think it'll come down fairly slowly. (I could be wrong, of course, but that's my current forecast.)
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
59,066
Reaction score
3,747
Periodic reminder: nominal interest rates don't matter. Only real interest rates do. Singapore dollar inflation is running at 5.4% at last report (Singapore's CPI, April to April, year on year). If Singapore dollar inflation is similar or even fairly substantially lower than the last reported annual inflation rate then the next SSB (and current SSB) will have negative real interest rates.

Yes, OK, if you're using (a reasonable amount of) SSBs for emergency cash reserves (for emergency month #2 onward), that's fine. And/or for a specific large spending objective a couple years from now, such as a down payment on a home or a university tuition bill. A less negative (but still negative) real interest rate might be the best you can do in these circumstances. But SSBs are NOT designed to be long-term investment vehicles. Even the government will tell you that.

I was much more excited/interested in SSBs at slightly lower nominal interest rates back circa 2019, and I told you so in so many words. Those were better deals with about 3 years of low inflation ahead, still for the roles that SSBs are designed to play. Today? "Eh." Nominal rates are "high" precisely because inflation expectations are "high." I think we'll see that 5.4% inflation rate come down, but if forced to predict I think it'll come down fairly slowly. (I could be wrong, of course, but that's my current forecast.)
yes nominal interest rates don't matter, but real interest rates do.

but unless and until real interest rates get published, looking for the highest nominal interest rates is what matters.
 

lzydata

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
5,978
Reaction score
2,225
Yes, OK, if you're using (a reasonable amount of) SSBs for emergency cash reserves (for emergency month #2 onward), that's fine. And/or for a specific large spending objective a couple years from now, such as a down payment on a home or a university tuition bill.
Oh good, so SSBs do get your approval for some situations. I am sure everyone is thankful to read that.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,119
Reaction score
3,014
Oh good, so SSBs do get your approval for some situations. I am sure everyone is thankful to read that.
I'm just commenting on the basic math, lzydata. People can do whatever they want to do as long as it's legal, but the basic financial math will determine the outcome of financial decisions. That's important to remember.

I hold some SSBs, so obviously I'm not opposed to them. But I also know what they are: not very good right now! All SSBs are currently losing real purchasing power, and (call me crazy!) I don't get excited about that. Sorry to rain on this parade, but some rain is deserved.
 

hyperfuse

Master Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2019
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
1,315
I'm just commenting on the basic math, lzydata. People can do whatever they want to do as long as it's legal, but the basic financial math will determine the outcome of financial decisions. That's important to remember.

I hold some SSBs, so obviously I'm not opposed to them. But I also know what they are: not very good right now! All SSBs are currently losing real purchasing power, and (call me crazy!) I don't get excited about that. Sorry to rain on this parade, but some rain is deserved.
yup ssb losing real purchase power but its better than putting in a tin can or a bank.

stocks also losing money and there is no guarantee that ppl buy the dip now, they can reap profits later on whereas SSB is a sort of guaranteed that you will get profits.

The past history performances of stocks, etf and what else doesnt mean the future will follow the past trend too also.

Because to be so anal about all this miniscule stuff, i can also say the time spend of someone typing in hardwarezone forum can be use to earn money elsewhere. So the time on hardwarezone is "losing purchasing power too" because it could actually use to earn more money hehe.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
59,066
Reaction score
3,747
I'm just commenting on the basic math, lzydata. People can do whatever they want to do as long as it's legal, but the basic financial math will determine the outcome of financial decisions. That's important to remember.

I hold some SSBs, so obviously I'm not opposed to them. But I also know what they are: not very good right now! All SSBs are currently losing real purchasing power, and (call me crazy!) I don't get excited about that. Sorry to rain on this parade, but some rain is deserved.
How did you deduce that you are raining on the parade?

Like you said, you are holding some SSBs, so others who are also holding some SSBs like you are just chasing the highest interest rate they can get for the some SSBs they want to hold.

Is that basic financial math?
 

stephenbishop

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2000
Messages
492
Reaction score
201
Because to be so anal about all this miniscule stuff, i can also say the time spend of someone typing in hardwarezone forum can be use to earn money elsewhere. So the time on hardwarezone is "losing purchasing power too" because it could actually use to earn more money hehe.
Very true and seriously funny.... :ROFLMAO:
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,119
Reaction score
3,014
yup ssb losing real purchase power but its better than putting in a tin can or a bank.
That's true! SSBs are outperforming ordinary Singapore dollar bank deposits, fixed deposits, and cash in a can. SSBs are slightly less liquid, though (maximum 5 weeks to withdraw). If the reduction in liquidity is acceptable then SSBs can be comparatively attractive.
stocks also losing money and there is no guarantee that ppl buy the dip now, they can reap profits later on whereas SSB is a sort of guaranteed that you will get profits.
No, SSBs are only nominally guaranteed by the Government of Singapore. You (the SSB holder) assume ALL omnipresent inflation risk, and future inflation over your holding period will determine the real outcome. You could come out ahead, even, or behind — even well behind. All those outcomes are entirely possible with SSBs.
The past history performances of stocks, etf and what else doesnt mean the future will follow the past trend too also.
Likewise, the past Singapore dollar inflation rate is not necessarily indicative of future results. Nobody is offering any real outcome guarantees here, sorry to say. SSBs (beyond reasonable Paragraph #1 holding amounts) are wagers in favor of low Singapore dollar inflation (i.e. wagers against moderate or high Singapore dollar inflation).

By the way, we should get another month of inflation data from Singstat before the next SSB's purchase deadline. We should also get the next SP Services quarterly electricity rate tomorrow (July 1), and we already know there's some more Singapore dollar inflation baked in with the successive GST hikes for the next 2 years. So we'll get a few more clues about inflation going forward, but it's still an uncertain wager.
Because to be so anal about all this miniscule stuff, i can also say the time spend of someone typing in hardwarezone forum can be use to earn money elsewhere. So the time on hardwarezone is "losing purchasing power too" because it could actually use to earn more money hehe.
A 5.4% inflation rate is not "anal" or miniscule. It's basically the whole ball game, actually. Reality is reality.
 

jayou8

Member
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
305
Reaction score
184
I'm just commenting on the basic math, lzydata. People can do whatever they want to do as long as it's legal, but the basic financial math will determine the outcome of financial decisions. That's important to remember.

I hold some SSBs, so obviously I'm not opposed to them. But I also know what they are: not very good right now! All SSBs are currently losing real purchasing power, and (call me crazy!) I don't get excited about that. Sorry to rain on this parade, but some rain is deserved.

Just reading an article on "Strategists see lower returns as economy mirrors 1970s". If anything similar to 1970s, stocks and bonds might have similar poor returns against inflation.

the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which was just above 800 at the start of the 1970s, had only advanced to about 839 by the end of the decade, an overall gain of 5% over this 10-year period. Furthermore, when adjusted for inflation, stock market investors were down about 49% over the course of the decade.

Firstly I am not saying we will be like 1970s. But I would like to find out what excites people now to put their money to beat inflation. The article did mention the below and so I think sex is not the answer here. :LOL:

The 1970s was fun. Way more fun than now. There was an astonishing amount of sex,” said Ferguson. “There was actually a very rigorous study that was based on multidecade surveys which proved conclusively that there has never been a generation that has had more sex than the generation that was born in the 1950s.
 

sgbird

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2009
Messages
664
Reaction score
134
Quite sad to see useless argue here. I would say we are all adults and we take the responsibilities for what we buy. Blindly following is a not the fault of financial product but the nature of human characteristics.
In this thread most ppl come here for checking when to buy SSB, how to buy SSB and where to check SSB. Not to argue SSB is worthy or not
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
59,066
Reaction score
3,747
That's true! SSBs are outperforming ordinary Singapore dollar bank deposits, fixed deposits, and cash in a can. SSBs are slightly less liquid, though (maximum 5 weeks to withdraw). If the reduction in liquidity is acceptable then SSBs can be comparatively attractive.

No, SSBs are only nominally guaranteed by the Government of Singapore. You (the SSB holder) assume ALL omnipresent inflation risk, and future inflation over your holding period will determine the real outcome. You could come out ahead, even, or behind — even well behind. All those outcomes are entirely possible with SSBs.

Likewise, the past Singapore dollar inflation rate is not necessarily indicative of future results. Nobody is offering any real outcome guarantees here, sorry to say. SSBs (beyond reasonable Paragraph #1 holding amounts) are wagers in favor of low Singapore dollar inflation (i.e. wagers against moderate or high Singapore dollar inflation).

By the way, we should get another month of inflation data from Singstat before the next SSB's purchase deadline. We should also get the next SP Services quarterly electricity rate tomorrow (July 1), and we already know there's some more Singapore dollar inflation baked in with the successive GST hikes for the next 2 years. So we'll get a few more clues about inflation going forward, but it's still an uncertain wager.

A 5.4% inflation rate is not "anal" or miniscule. It's basically the whole ball game, actually. Reality is reality.
The point is, you are giving good info, keep it at that.

but your delivery needs refining, I.e., don’t talk down to people with the “I know better than thou” kind of attitude. Rubs people the wrong way when you keep hitting on the same point as if people don’t know.

Is not like people writing in this forum is writing legal paper that requires such precision to hedge that they know is about real interest in all the post they make
 
Last edited:

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
59,066
Reaction score
3,747
Quite sad to see useless argue here. I would say we are all adults and we take the responsibilities for what we buy. Blindly following is a not the fault of financial product but the nature of human characteristics.
In this thread most ppl come here for checking when to buy SSB, how to buy SSB and where to check SSB. Not to argue SSB is worthy or not
Some people just want to give the “I know better than thou” kind of rub down
 

CaptainWu

Senior Member
Joined
May 18, 2019
Messages
774
Reaction score
147
People who got more than $18k to deploy don't need to wait for SSB. Just keep $18k for the next SSB, and find something else to invest in for the rest. I managed to buy some Astrea V at face value ($1) on Monday.

Looking at how fast it is building up the reserves account, I am happy to buy more at $1. But Liquidity is so low, pls don't follow me and bid up the price, thanks! :cool: 🌵 📈
I queued Astrea V at lower price (0.996/7) last week and could'nt get it and now the price rise recently!
 

stephenbishop

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2000
Messages
492
Reaction score
201
Firstly I am not saying we will be like 1970s. But I would like to find out what excites people now to put their money to beat inflation.
I guess that depends on one's risk appetite and investment time horizon?

If one believes high inflation will be with us at least for the next 2 or 3 years (which I do not), and one has a long enough investment horizon (which also I do not), then the commodities and energy sectors may be exciting. However, if one also believes that the high inflation would be accompanied by low growth (i.e. stagflation), even these sectors would not be very exciting. Real estate and real estate related equity securities may be a good hedge but not particularly exciting.

For me a big portion will remain in cash and short term SGS given my risk appetite and investment time horizon.
 

hyperfuse

Master Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2019
Messages
3,594
Reaction score
1,315
No, SSBs are only nominally guaranteed by the Government of Singapore. You (the SSB holder) assume ALL omnipresent inflation risk, and future inflation over your holding period will determine the real outcome. You could come out ahead, even, or behind — even well behind. All those outcomes are entirely possible with SSBs.
Oh nominally guaranteed. Able to further elaborate?

I know the capital is guaranteed. So then the interest is not guaranteed?
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,119
Reaction score
3,014
Just reading an article on "Strategists see lower returns as economy mirrors 1970s". If anything similar to 1970s, stocks and bonds might have similar poor returns against inflation.

Firstly I am not saying we will be like 1970s. But I would like to find out what excites people now to put their money to beat inflation.
Possible the next 10 years will be like the 1970s! But nobody who seriously looks at this stuff uses the DJIA. That immediately raises a "cherrypicking" red flag. (The DJIA is just a "fun" historical index of 30 stocks, but that's all it is. It doesn't even pretend to be representative of the U.S. stock market except perhaps up to the 1950s at the latest.) Let's take a look at the U.S. S&P 500 index to get a much more accurate sense of what happened in the U.S. context:

January 2, 1970: 93.00
December 28, 1979: 107.84

So in nominal U.S. dollar terms the U.S. stock market was up 15.96% over that decade. Not great, but a lot better than the DJIA's 5%. And the S&P 500 stocks were also throwing off 10 years of rather nice dividends. Here are the gross nominal dividend yields for each year in that decade:

1970: 3.49%
1971: 3.10%
1972: 2.68%
1973: 3.57%
1974: 5.37%
1975: 4.15%
1976: 3.87%
1977: 4.98%
1978: 5.28%
1979: 5.24%

Add that all up (reinvested net dividends) and you probably held real value over the decade if you bought $X at the beginning of the decade and sold everything at the end. Toss in dollar cost averaging effects and you did a bit better than that.

Let me see if I can find U.S. Treasury interest rates... OK, hard to find exactly, but it looks like the 10 year U.S. Treasury purchased at original auction on or about January 2, 1970, would have had a gross nominal yield of right around 7.0%. So that was decent as it turned out, if held to maturity anyway. In the 1970s Series E U.S. Savings Bonds were available. I can't instantly find their historical interest rates, but I'm pretty sure they were substantially less attractive than U.S. Treasuries and most probably real losers over the decade.
 

BBCWatcher

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
20,119
Reaction score
3,014
Oh nominally guaranteed. Able to further elaborate?
The Monetary Authority of Singapore only promises to pay specific numbers of Singapore dollars when you buy a SSB. There are nominal interest payments at 6 month intervals and then return of nominal principal.
I know the capital is guaranteed. So then the interest is not guaranteed?
Both are guaranteed but only nominally. The MAS makes no adjustments whatsoever to account for Singapore dollar inflation. If for example the Singapore dollar loses real purchasing power at an average rate of 4% per year (which is substantially less than the current Singapore dollar inflation rate) then the current SSB will be a substantial real loser.

All purchasers/holders of all Singapore Government Securities, including SSBs, must assume ALL of the Singapore dollar inflation risk inherent in all Singapore dollar-based promises. That's the real deal on offer.

I should add the footnote that there is one possible offer on the table in terms of a guaranteed real outcome. PIMCO is offering a bond fund in Singapore that contains high quality inflation-indexed (a.k.a. real return) sovereign bonds (that several other developed economy governments offer), and then the fund is Singapore dollar hedged. But that's not quite an explicit, direct guarantee of a real outcome especially over short holding periods.

None of the above are recommendations. I'm just explaining how this stuff actually, really works (or doesn't work), and then you can decide what you want to do.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top