HeadQuarters
High Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2005
- Messages
- 34,938
- Reaction score
- 1,843
Then what he suggest huh?
He is one of the authors of the Great Barrington Declaration. The 3 authors from Harvard, Oxford, Stanford.A leading scientist has told The Telegraph that lockdowns are the biggest public health mistake in history. Jay Bhattacharya is a professor of medicine at Stanford University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
In the context of Singapore, what difference in availability of shops open with food and supplies is there? Got lockdown no lockdown also go to the same NTUCs and kopitiam to buy things what.And this is why the infection increase in a lockdown. Wuhun virus is airborne. People need to buy food and supply in a lockdown. Only a few place will be open. Infected people go to the same place as healthy people in a lock down to buy food and supplies. The shop will be contaminated. The infected people will infect the healthy. These people that just got infected will contaminate their building.
You need to think it logically. Step by steps.
Covid is supposed to rid of selfish and reckless people who die die refuse to stay home and must go out to endanger othersHe is saying it is causing massive collateral damage. Psychologically and economically.
It may be better to let people die if the cost of lockdown is greater.
A leading scientist has told The Telegraph that lockdowns are the biggest public health mistake in history. Jay Bhattacharya is a professor of medicine at Stanford University and a research associate at the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Speaking to The Telegraph’s Planet Normal podcast, Professor Bhattacharya said:
“I do think that future historians will look back on this and say this was the single biggest public health mistake, possibly of all history in terms of the scope of the harm that it’s caused.”
Ya.Yes we all saw what happened last year in countries that didn't take the virus seriously or had half-hearted lockdowns
Full ICU capacities, high number of deaths, an overburdened funeral industry - like what happened in India
Staying at home obviously a worse choice compared to the above
And this is why the infection increase in a lockdown. Wuhun virus is airborne. People need to buy food and supply in a lockdown. Only a few place will be open. Infected people go to the same place as healthy people in a lock down to buy food and supplies. The shop will be contaminated. The infected people will infect the healthy. These people that just got infected will contaminate their building.
You need to think it logically. Step by steps.
It's a bio weapon design to reset mankind.
If lockdown, economy suffer, people tiao lao. If don't lockdown, people suffer from infection or die.
Either way also tio checkmate. There is no way to escape.
The best any Gov can do is to try to contain the spread as much as possible while preserving the economy and livelihood of its citizens.
It's an acid test on the capability of Governments on a global scale.