Haha what makes u think you will not raise your hard cut off target?i can't remember how many times I have revised my target upwards
But my hard cut off is 55 years old. I will try to ask for voluntary retirement then
Haha what makes u think you will not raise your hard cut off target?i can't remember how many times I have revised my target upwards
But my hard cut off is 55 years old. I will try to ask for voluntary retirement then
because time will be running out for a good quality retirement past 55 i believe.Haha what makes u think you will not raise your hard cut off target?
i can't remember how many times I have revised my target upwards
But my hard cut off is 55 years old. I will try to ask for voluntary retirement then
i will disagree. I find age to be a real factor to decide when to quit. Perhaps I am one without many hobbies so work does keep me occupied physically and mentally. Of course if work has become a pain to the point it drains you, then it is a no brainer to call it a day.That's why you shouldn't set too low a target then won't have to keep revising. If your portfolio size is 10x your annual salary then you might be tempted to work 1-2 more years to give yourself more buffer. If your portfolio is 30x your annual salary then working for that 1-2 years won't make much of a difference. Instead of comparing to my expenses, I like to compare it to my income instead, make it easier to decide when to quit.
Unfortunately some MIW may feel 55 is too early hence they keep raising the retirement age. Of cuz they did not force you to keep working beyond 55 but based on their policy it seems they are encouraging you to work beyond that.i will disagree. I find age to be a real factor to decide when to quit. Perhaps I am one without many hobbies so work does keep me occupied physically and mentally. Of course if work has become a pain to the point it drains you, then it is a no brainer to call it a day.
before 50 is too early for me and after 60 will be too late. 55 seems to be a sweet spot for me
i don't give a hoot ass about what the MIW thinkUnfortunately some MIW may feel 55 is too early hence they keep raising the retirement age. Of cuz they did not force you to keep working beyond 55 but based on their policy it seems they are encouraging you to work beyond that.
Like you I feel 55 is nice. Yesterday my boss say they do employ current company retired employees on freelance based on project basis so I think I may stay longer in current employment. Freelance means no cpf I also dunno as they are not local companies but since I like software development I can keep doing after 55.
Hahaha... another oppie I see. I switch sides when I get "retrenched" and discover depressed salaries for so many years in my IT line. Only in recent years my payslip jump up more which means in my earlier working years my salary is depressed due to many come in do same kind of job. If I born late then better start off earn much more liao.i don't give a hoot ass about what the MIW think
i think you will continue to try to hit 3 after you hit 2
i will disagree. I find age to be a real factor to decide when to quit. Perhaps I am one without many hobbies so work does keep me occupied physically and mentally. Of course if work has become a pain to the point it drains you, then it is a no brainer to call it a day.
before 50 is too early for me and after 60 will be too late. 55 seems to be a sweet spot for me
do u feel that going up from 1m is harder than before? as in need to rebalance portfolio and revise strategy?2 mil i semi-close shop alr. find a brainless job to cover day-to-day expenses can alr
do u feel that going up from 1m is harder than before? as in need to rebalance portfolio and revise strategy?
do u feel that going up from 1m is harder than before? as in need to rebalance portfolio and revise strategy?
i can't remember how many times I have revised my target upwards
But my hard cut off is 55 years old. I will try to ask for voluntary retirement then
I did mention a hard cut of age for myself above. The reason I slot that as a OR condition is to prevent myself to keep moving the target higher. So the criteria is now $x or 55 years old whichever comes first (although X can still be revise higher until 55!)I thought we were discussing portfolio size instead of age. Age is of course a major factor but for me I have a upper limit but no lower limit, max 55 years old which I have decided since the first year I started working. I am only trying to decide when to call it a day before 55.
I remember you are getting married. Are you having kids and how will it affect your plans?dont think it will be harder. like laokorkor said, i now have $1 mil working for me on top of my work income. while my expenses has gone up due to mortgages and a small deg of lifestyle inflation, my income has gone up as well.
portfolio wise, my strategy now is very different from the way it was when i first started. its now much more passive than before. i have no plan to change my strat for now.
Yea, married already, and we do plan to have kids. My wife and i are both not the type that will spend a ton on kids enrichment, mind champ and what not, i think, given how we ourselves were both raised. But our thinking may change after we become parents.I remember you are getting married. Are you having kids and how will it affect your plans?
Yes, don’t worry too much on cost of raising kids.Yea, married already, and we do plan to have kids. My wife and i are both not the type that will spend a ton on kids enrichment, mind champ and what not, i think, given how we ourselves were both raised. But our thinking may change after we become parents.
Honestly, I might be underestimating the cost of raising a kid, but I'm also very conservative in projecting my asset growth, so there sld be some buffer there. And if the math dosnt work out at the end of the day, I can jus delay my retirement/semi retirement by a few years.
Regarding the subject of tuition for kids.Yea, married already, and we do plan to have kids. My wife and i are both not the type that will spend a ton on kids enrichment, mind champ and what not, i think, given how we ourselves were both raised. But our thinking may change after we become parents.
Regarding the subject of tuition for kids.
My wife and my combined income is very middle class (NOA ~SGD 120k). Initially, we decide to give tuition to our P3 son ourselves, but in the end spends SGD 800 monthly on his tuition due to our work commitments and lack of competence in the subjects. The fees are high despite our middle class income cos I've to feed my 2 parents and MIL and lifestyle creep. People told me that students who have a head start in tuition during primary perform differently during secondary and pre-U years and I agree.
The global advent of AI and its possible implication - the stratification of income, and the have and have-not, means that to be a middle or upper-middle class in my son's future, you now need not just a degree but a degree from a good University in perhaps STEM subjects.
If you just dump your kids to tuition, you'll end up with mediocre children who will one day, be a hardworking employee getting retrenched in his mid-30s. So think farther ahead, and be more holistic.Yea, married already, and we do plan to have kids. My wife and i are both not the type that will spend a ton on kids enrichment, mind champ and what not, i think, given how we ourselves were both raised. But our thinking may change after we become parents.
Honestly, I might be underestimating the cost of raising a kid, but I'm also very conservative in projecting my asset growth, so there sld be some buffer there. And if the math dosnt work out at the end of the day, I can jus delay my retirement/semi retirement by a few years.
I don't think it's as bad as crash and burn. He's has product endorsement and is working in a Temasek linked VC firm now.Another example: Joseph Schooling. His parents and himself, only focused on Olympic medal. After he got it, he crashed and burned. They could have been more wholistic about the approach, because there are so many other sports people they can learn from, and giving the excuse that this is the first time, is not acceptable IMO.
Well, I think Joseph would have preferred to continue his swimming career and winning a 2nd Olympic medal.I don't think it's as bad as crash and burn. He's has product endorsement and is working in a Temasek linked VC firm now.