Primary residence (non performing asset) cannot be considered as net worth even fully paid up.
That's why some people stretch their loan to maximum tenure to leverage even if they can fully pay up.
Technically to up your net worth you must rent out condo for passive income.
Rent a luxury condo in JB to leverage gains plus lifestyle maintain status quo minus the stupid long queues at immigration!
Staying in Johor Bahru is a form of leveraging.
Car is also a depreciative asset so every year net worth become less but offset by income if any.
To boost net worth must be like bro hwarzoner.
Zero hard assets but cash rich.
CPF wise can see but cannot touch until 55.
If CPF also considered as net worth many Singaporeans are multi millionaires.
I estimate in 5 years time bro hwarzoner could see his first million but subject to stock gains or losses.![]()
Primary residence (sans the outstanding mortgage, if any) is definitely an asset, but its not a liquid or investable asset, and unlike other assets the only way to monetize it requires the owner to take a hit in his standard of living. Of course this is not to say that a person who owns a paid up 2rm flat + 500k cash is richer than a person who owns a paid up semi-d but has no cash.
Many people choose to extend the loan tenure (increase leverage) when real interest rates are negative i.e inflation > interest rates, and they have been negative for several years because Singapore does not have an independent monetary policy, people who are overextended are going to be caught with their pants down should economic conditions between the US and SG diverge significantly.
