IREIT Global *Official* (SGX: UD1U)

funnycow

Master Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Messages
3,534
Reaction score
28
New ipo...!

88 cents again.

8% yield for FY 2015

Listing on 8 Aug :o :o

Nav 78 cents
 
Last edited:

funnycow

Master Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Messages
3,534
Reaction score
28
Haha. Hm but the NAV 78 cents though.....

I read Chinese tycoon plans to buy about 60% of the ipo
 

Bedokian

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
2,199
Reaction score
7
I see a lot of 8s around, perhaps more for auspicious reasons to have these figures?
 

Minx99

Master Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
0
Anyone have a link to this IPO prospectus? Can't seem to find it on SGX opera website? Thanks.
 

lzydata

Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
6,455
Reaction score
2,747
After skimming through:

- German office properties - that's a first for Singapore.
- Investment mandate of office properties in Europe - also a first.
- Projected DPU of 7c per year through to 31 Dec 2016 or about 8.0% yield on IPO price of 88c, supported by a guarantee of 100% distribution up to then
- 13% premium to book value (78c)
- Gearing of about 31%

But the biggest thing that struck me is the structure of the REIT. The sponsor is a company owned by Itzhak Sella, a real estate investor-manager in Europe and Israel. At the level of the manager, Tong Jinquan will own 65%, the rest by a company that is 87.5% owned by Sella. At the level of the REIT units, Tong will own 60% and the public 40%. Sella will be executive director and CEO of the REIT and Tong a non-executive director. There is a third figure, Ms Jeremy Adina Bard Cooper, who will serve as CEO of the manager and CIO of the REIT, but she owns in effect only 4.375% of the manager.

While there will be an independent non-executive chairman, independent directors, the trustee and all the usual corporate governance safeguards, it seems this show is going to be run by two individuals: Sella and Tong. You could say that this may not be a bad thing because one has full rein over the operation and the other has the most skin in the game. But what if they disagree over strategy or decisions? Would that not be very troublesome, compared to a case where ownership and control was more spread out?

When Soilbuild listed its REIT I noted its somewhat unusual arrangement where the Soilbuild founder took the majority stake in his individual capacity and not the sponsor Soilbuild Construction Group. This is a totally different level. To me personality issues will be the greatest risk factor.
 

sandwicher

Senior Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2007
Messages
1,421
Reaction score
4
Sounds not too bad. However, I do not know and I'm not comfortable with the risk of:
1. Europe economy - Italy banks are recently in news again, hinting at a possible relapse of the EU breakdown.
2. Euro currency fluctuation which may affect the yield in SGD.
3. Russia/Ukraine crisis which may affect Germany (Germany buys gas and oil from Russia)
4. Stability of the Germany government? Not too sure.

8% is quite high. But for me, I think since they're such risks involved, I require a higher return in exchange.

But those who knows more about the German economy can take a look at this! :)
 

funnycow

Master Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Messages
3,534
Reaction score
28
yeah, its a portfolio with properties solely in Germany.

only 4 properties. freehold though.
 

actman

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2001
Messages
5,641
Reaction score
91
A smart Chinese tycoon that takes advantage of current low interest rate to buy in SREIT which is of higher yield.
 

SpeedingBullet

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2004
Messages
38,532
Reaction score
1,352
A smart Chinese tycoon that takes advantage of current low interest rate to buy in SREIT which is of higher yield.

hes just shuffling his excess billions outside of China like any rich Chinese man would :s13:

The others are buying real estate in Europe/US.
 

kenpachi82

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2007
Messages
16,487
Reaction score
5,212
$ made in China have to be transferred to offshore investments to turn it into legitimate $..
 

Minx99

Master Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
2,905
Reaction score
0
$ made in China have to be transferred to offshore investments to turn it into legitimate $..
Yes, we can sort of guess from the REITs that he have invested so far, not exactly the creme de la creme type ;)
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top