Magnus Energy Group *Official* (SGX:41S)

vin111328

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2016
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Sharing is caring - I found this article online. Have you guy read it ?

sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/magnus-energy-inks-deal-jointly-020700394.html

Magnus Energy inks deal to jointly manage construction projects in Java

Singapore Business Review &ndash Tue, Feb 2, 2016 10:07 AM SGT

It will provide up to $2 million as working capital.
A subsidiary of Singapore-listed Magnus Energy has entered into an agreement with Indonesian company PT Hanjungin to jointly manage an infrastructure construction project in West and Central Java.
The projects are expected to be completed within six months.
Magnus Energy said that the deal will allow the company to participate in the management and net profits of the road project. Magnus Energy will provide up to $2 million as working capital for the project for a period of up to six months.
The project is expected to have a positive effect on Magnus Energy' s net tangible assets per share and earnings per share for the current financial year.

Any comment ?
 

HaplessN

Junior Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2016
Messages
75
Reaction score
10
Just throwing my 2 cents out here, but company fundamentals looks quite poor, so I wouldn't touch this counter too. Did a very brief glance at their financial report (so please take what I say with a grain of salt) and 3 things stood out right away
Massive loss in 2014, on the order of something like 7 million plus. Sometimes companies have bad year or one off losses, doesn't necessarily mean they are terrible, but this amount is too massive, considering their profit of only 4 million plus in the previous year. Personally feel the downside risk is just too big

Secondly, they have poor cash flows. Naturally, with such volatile earnings. They also disposed significant financial assets indicated in their cash flow statements to meet their cash flow requirements (naturally they have to do that since they have a weak balance sheet) that dropped their nav significantly.

Lastly the article you link, I pretty much read it as "a business clinched a business deal". i don't mean to sound guailan but there's too little information in the article and in essence the only thing you can garner from the article is that they clinch a deal, which businesses do all the time, and they got a capital infusion, which businesses achieve most of the time when they cinch deals. Considering company fundamentals, I wouldn't dare to touch this counter.
 
Last edited:

vin111328

Junior Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2016
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi.. HaplessN, Thanks for reply. If you want to read more about this article , you can find it in their website.

magnusenergy.com.sg/announcements%5C2016/20160201General%20Announcement%20Road%20Projects%20in%20West%20and%20Central%20Java%20Indonesia.pdf
 

limster

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
12,491
Reaction score
3,546
The project is expected to have a positive effect on Magnus Energy' s net tangible assets per share and earnings per share for the current financial year.

Any comment ?


Mark to Market Strikes Again! :D

They are providing $2m capital, and in return, they get to "participate" in management and a share of the profits. There is no reason for NTA is increase except for MTM ....

Seriously, if the coy treats this as an increase in NTA rather than recognising the income as it occurs, you had better read their accounts carefully.
 

IAmZTX

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2011
Messages
2,303
Reaction score
70
Magnus Energy (41s)

Hey all,

need your advice in this counter! Is the fundamentals strong?

Since it is cheap, is there room for growth? Price: 0.0003...
 

birdbirdman

Master Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
3,744
Reaction score
40
I think is same group as Asiason liongold blumont one.. nvr collapse maybe got chance pump magnus.. but collapse liao i think now is a goner too
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
2,442
Reaction score
1
Undervalued gem, decent balance sheet. Current assets>current liabilities, acid test ratio at 3.691. Don't seem like this company will go bust. Only concern is the the management, limited growth but definitely worth more than 0.001.

Net asset value per ordinary share was 0.63 cents.

http://www.sgx.com/wps/portal/sgxweb/home/company_disclosure/stockfacts?page=1&code=41S&lang=en-us


TA wise, price bottoming out. At least 2500%-5000% gain if soley base on TA. DYODD.
806ab69193d67029594fffd7ef1500059b6ae541.png
 
Last edited:

Takodoro

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2008
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
3
Undervalued gem, decent balance sheet. Current assets>current liabilities, acid test ratio at 3.691. Don't seem like this company will go bust. Only concern is the the management, limited growth but definitely worth more than 0.001.

Net asset value per ordinary share was 0.63 cents.

http://www.sgx.com/wps/portal/sgxweb/home/company_disclosure/stockfacts?page=1&code=41S&lang=en-us


TA wise, price bottoming out. At least 2500%-5000% gain if soley base on TA. DYODD.

Price already at bottom. Either (1) get trade-halt-->go bust or (2) onwards and upwards.

Huge huge resistance at 0.002. But buy volume seems to slowly creep up.
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
2,442
Reaction score
1
Price already at bottom. Either (1) get trade-halt-->go bust or (2) onwards and upwards.

Huge huge resistance at 0.002. But buy volume seems to slowly creep up.

I will rule out that this company will go bust. Look at the financial statement, don't look like will go bust, this company can liquidate everything and pay back shareholder, per share also more than 10cents. To add on, current 0.002 resistance is to scare people off, they want to accumulate at 0.001, but when it burst, it will be crazy profits.
 

ctstalin

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2007
Messages
26,444
Reaction score
3,982
holding 650k shares for quite a while already and waiting for the huge burst :s13:
 

Average

Banned
Joined
Apr 14, 2012
Messages
28,995
Reaction score
290
Undervalued gem, decent balance sheet. Current assets>current liabilities, acid test ratio at 3.691. Don't seem like this company will go bust. Only concern is the the management, limited growth but definitely worth more than 0.001.

Net asset value per ordinary share was 0.63 cents.

http://www.sgx.com/wps/portal/sgxweb/home/company_disclosure/stockfacts?page=1&code=41S&lang=en-us


TA wise, price bottoming out. At least 2500%-5000% gain if soley base on TA. DYODD.
806ab69193d67029594fffd7ef1500059b6ae541.png
u are twocentsanalysis?

Sent from 金鸡 using GAGT
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top