Hope u r under eldershield. If u under careshield life, u r trapped and cant opt out.
Practically everybody who has ElderShield now, such as decibel., won't be
forced to switch to
CareShield Life.
There are basically three cohorts:
1. If you were born before 1970, nothing much happens. If you have base ElderShield (no supplements), the government will start servicing your policy from mid-2021. You may be able to switch to CareShield Life, and you should seriously consider doing so. (CSL is better.)
2. If you were born sometime within the years 1970 to 1979, and if you have ElderShield 400, you will be automatically switched to CareShield Life in mid-2021. You should seriously consider sticking with the automatic switch, but you have until December 31, 2023, to switch back to ElderShield 400.
3. If you were born in 1980 or later, and if you are a Singaporean citizen or Singapore Permanent Resident, you will be required to participate in CareShield Life starting from your 30th birthday. Unlike MediShield Life,
there is no participation exception for Singaporean citizens who are long-term residents of a foreign country.(*) However, also unlike MediShield Life, the CareShield Life benefits will be claimable outside Singapore.
If you were born in the first half of 1980 and join ElderShield 400 (which I think is allowed) then it's possible you'll effectively fall into cohort #2. Regardless, CareShield Life will be compulsory for you (if a citizen or PR).
If you were born in 1980 or later and don't want to participate in CareShield Life, then you'll have to terminate your Singaporean citizenship or Singapore Permanent Residence, as applicable, then cancel CSL. Financially that won't be a smart thing to do if you're "vested" or nearly vested.
(*) One could argue that Singapore will join the ranks of status-based (sometimes misleadingly called "citizenship-based") taxation countries from mid-2020 with the introduction of CareShield Life. I would make that argument, and I've made it before. Is a "compulsory premium" a tax? I don't see why it wouldn't be. For what it's worth, the U.S. Supreme Court didn't see any difference between a compulsory insurance premium
paid to a private insurer and a tax. This compulsory premium is paid to the government.