GE2020 61.24% vs GE2011 60.1%, which one worse?

Laneige

Honorary Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
103,420
Reaction score
11,941
If only LHY contested in Tanjong Pagar, the overall mandate for PAP is definitely less than 60%.

Wasted sia, this watershed election really wasted for PSP.

People need to understand majority seem wary of him if he runs for election
So it’s gd he’s doing behind work instead
 

SCHNOTTZ

Supremacy Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
5,988
Reaction score
4,894
2020 is definitely the worst.

the ground is much more sweeter now than in 2011. 100 billion spent, pandemic going on, to lose 2 grcs is really a bad result, u cant sugarcoat it.

I have more faith in Singaporean now, especially young voters. You can't buy them with cash handout ($600 x 2).
 

DarkStarer

High Supremacy Member
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
49,598
Reaction score
5,477
Maybe is the sengkang people queue up 1hr to vote then dulan liao so vote WP
 

sAVaGEmP5

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2002
Messages
10,132
Reaction score
1,235
Same number but more seats lost. Its a sign... Paper cannot wrap fire
 

DarkStarer

High Supremacy Member
Joined
May 10, 2008
Messages
49,598
Reaction score
5,477
Actually I thought the pandemic exposed the vulnerabilities of PAP.

They were so proud of the temp screening and SOP and kept chirping world class standards. Then suddenly top few cases in the world, lack of medical protective eq everywhere (masks, sanitiser, thermometer), foreign worker dorms spreading like wildfire.

People making a joke out of us. No face to hide.
 

jameskenrek

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2011
Messages
1,837
Reaction score
1,122
This one is worse. Everyone knows there is flight to security by voting incumbent. And yet, only 61%. I hope they do reflect over their work over the last five years.

Well said. Without the Pandemic, result will be worse?

Posted from PCWX using SM-N950F
 

OddEye

High Supremacy Member
Joined
May 27, 2008
Messages
31,934
Reaction score
2,585
Pap result could have been worse. Pandemic made some people vote to safety
 

standarture

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2009
Messages
46,796
Reaction score
9,891
How can be worst. Don't forget we supposed to have more new citizens to dilute the votes so this is damn good already.
 

chongquan82

Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2011
Messages
7,065
Reaction score
1,206
with the influx of new citizens over the last ten years, GE2020 is indeed worse than GE2011 for PAP.

GE2011
Valid votes 2,015,636
Total votes cast 2,060,373
Eligible voters (excluding walkover voters) 2,211,102
Electorate 2,350,873

GE2015
Valid votes 2,257,016
Total votes cast 2,304,331
Eligible voters (excluding walkover voters) 2,462,926
Electorate 2,462,926

GE2020
Valid votes 2,489,793
Total votes cast 2,535,565
Eligible voters (excluding walkover voters) 2,653,942
Electorate 2,653,942

150k more new citizens ???

:):):)
 

Courage

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
May 23, 2016
Messages
17,860
Reaction score
5,970
It doesn't matter which was worse since they are both under pinky. Pinky is shiat
 

SKenny

Banned
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
17,519
Reaction score
13
In 2020,
- they rushed into a GE in the middle of crisis which historically help their result
- Stroke Heng raided our reserve several times and gave away some $100 billion
- spent many years to try to pin blame on ATHC without success. Then "someone" started a civil suit against the 3 WP MPs
- they made the GE as the platform for endorsing their incoming 4G leaders
- started pofma which were used to quell political voices.

All the above should have a positive impact to their result. In the end, they were still down about some 9% on average and lost another GRC. They also almost lost a further 1-2 GRCs.

Lidat means good result anot?
 

iceblendedchoc

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
17,599
Reaction score
6,109
GE2011 Tanjong Pagar was walkover, that's why 60.1% right? If it was contested, it'll be a lot higher than 60.1% due to LKY presence, and likely higher than 61.24% now.

So you guys consider GE2020 to be the worst for PAP in terms of popular votes?

Should be the worse. 2020 is a mother of all crisis. But they garnered only 61%
 

Xeservico

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2018
Messages
1,828
Reaction score
32
Actually ah the better question is. Was 2020 the best outcome of a bad situation or the worst outcome of a good situation for them? Maybe PAP call the election early coz they scared way more people won't wanna vote them in after the pandemic.

2011 seemed like a worst outcome of a good situation for them while 2020 could be either way... Food for thought :s11::s11::s11:

See how the public mood is after the pandemic.
 
Last edited:

tanjiakpeng

Supremacy Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
5,811
Reaction score
543
The 39% will regret for shaking the political stability in sg

The reason why sg is able to attract FDI and flourish is because of political stability
 

Sultana

High Supremacy Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2016
Messages
29,485
Reaction score
6,314
If assume NC 30k per yr & 300k in 10yrs, 2020 is worse ...
 

TrueBeliever_jh

Honorary Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2006
Messages
112,795
Reaction score
4,436
GE2011 is worse.

considering LKY still alive and people still voted the other way round~ :mad:


even with the president election changes, COVID-19 screwjob, they still get better percentage~

then again. LKY ward is walkover right~? so how does the number get included~?
 

Ethan_

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2007
Messages
50,452
Reaction score
5,221
GE2011 Tanjong Pagar was walkover, that's why 60.1% right? If it was contested, it'll be a lot higher than 60.1% due to LKY presence, and likely higher than 61.24% now.

So you guys consider GE2020 to be the worst for PAP in terms of popular votes?
Walkover not counted into incumbent support base?

If 2011 lower %, how come they say until like this round is worse result since donkey years.
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts.

Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards, Terms of Service and Member T&Cs for more information.
Top