N Korean leader's to Trump:"I will surely and definitely tame mentally deranged US dotard with fire!

[singapurablue]

N Korean leader's to Trump:"I will surely and definitely tame mentally deranged US dotard with fire!

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un Friday warned he would make US President Donald Trump "pay dearly" for threatening the destruction of his country at the United Nations.

Here is the full text of his statement as published by the official KCNA news agency:

"The speech made by the US president in his maiden address on the UN arena in the prevailing serious circumstances, in which the situation on the Korean peninsula has been rendered tense as never before and is inching closer to a touch-and-go state, is arousing worldwide concern.

"Shaping the general idea of what he would say, I expected he would make stereotyped, prepared remarks a little different from what he used to utter in his office on the spur of the moment as he had to speak on the world's biggest official diplomatic stage.

"But, far from making remarks of any persuasive power that can be viewed to be helpful to defusing tension, he made unprecedented rude nonsense one has never heard from any of his predecessors.

"A frightened dog barks louder.

"I'd like to advise Trump to exercise prudence in selecting words and to be considerate of whom he speaks to when making a speech in front of the world. The mentally deranged behaviour of the US president openly expressing on the UN arena the unethical will to 'totally destroy' a sovereign state, beyond the boundary of threats of regime change or overturn of social system, makes even those with normal thinking faculty think about discretion and composure.

"His remarks remind me of such words as 'political layman' and 'political heretic' which were in vogue in reference to Trump during his presidential election campaign. After taking office Trump has rendered the world restless through threats and blackmail against all countries in the world. He is unfit to hold the prerogative of supreme command of a country, and he is surely a rogue and a gangster fond of playing with fire, rather than a politician.

"His remarks which described the US option through straightforward expression of his will have convinced me, rather than frightening or stopping me, that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last.

"Now that Trump has denied the existence of and insulted me and my country in front of the eyes of the world and made the most ferocious declaration of a war in history that he would destroy the DPRK, we will consider with seriousness exercising of a corresponding, highest level of hard-line countermeasure in history.

"Action is the best option in treating the dotard who, hard of hearing, is uttering only what he wants to say.

"As a man representing the DPRK and on behalf of the dignity and honour of my state and people and on my own, I will make the man holding the prerogative of the supreme command in the US pay dearly for his speech calling for totally destroying the DPRK.

"This is not a rhetorical expression loved by Trump.

"I am now thinking hard about what response he could have expected when he allowed such eccentric words to trip off his tongue.

"Whatever Trump might have expected, he will face results beyond his expectation.

"I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire."

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/09/21/552756716/kim-jong-un-issues-statement-on-trump-a-frightened-dog-barks-louder

 

[ferocity]

Dotard = retard that plays Dota?
Trump wants to rain fire and fury on n.k = Underlord
Bui bui kim wants to tame Trump = Chen or enchantress

 

[xLupDup]

too worldwide best mud slingers at work

 

[ferocity]

too worldwide best mud slingers at work

You know what they say about sticks and stones, but apparently these 2 feel its the other way round.

 

[delceer]

North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un Friday warned he would make US President Donald Trump "pay dearly" for threatening the destruction of his country at the United Nations.

Here is the full text of his statement as published by the official KCNA news agency:

"The speech made by the US president in his maiden address on the UN arena in the prevailing serious circumstances, in which the situation on the Korean peninsula has been rendered tense as never before and is inching closer to a touch-and-go state, is arousing worldwide concern.

"Shaping the general idea of what he would say, I expected he would make stereotyped, prepared remarks a little different from what he used to utter in his office on the spur of the moment as he had to speak on the world's biggest official diplomatic stage.

"But, far from making remarks of any persuasive power that can be viewed to be helpful to defusing tension, he made unprecedented rude nonsense one has never heard from any of his predecessors.

"A frightened dog barks louder.

"I'd like to advise Trump to exercise prudence in selecting words and to be considerate of whom he speaks to when making a speech in front of the world. The mentally deranged behaviour of the US president openly expressing on the UN arena the unethical will to 'totally destroy' a sovereign state, beyond the boundary of threats of regime change or overturn of social system, makes even those with normal thinking faculty think about discretion and composure.

"His remarks remind me of such words as 'political layman' and 'political heretic' which were in vogue in reference to Trump during his presidential election campaign. After taking office Trump has rendered the world restless through threats and blackmail against all countries in the world. He is unfit to hold the prerogative of supreme command of a country, and he is surely a rogue and a gangster fond of playing with fire, rather than a politician.

"His remarks which described the US option through straightforward expression of his will have convinced me, rather than frightening or stopping me, that the path I chose is correct and that it is the one I have to follow to the last.

"Now that Trump has denied the existence of and insulted me and my country in front of the eyes of the world and made the most ferocious declaration of a war in history that he would destroy the DPRK, we will consider with seriousness exercising of a corresponding, highest level of hard-line countermeasure in history.

"Action is the best option in treating the dotard who, hard of hearing, is uttering only what he wants to say.

"As a man representing the DPRK and on behalf of the dignity and honour of my state and people and on my own, I will make the man holding the prerogative of the supreme command in the US pay dearly for his speech calling for totally destroying the DPRK.

"This is not a rhetorical expression loved by Trump.

"I am now thinking hard about what response he could have expected when he allowed such eccentric words to trip off his tongue.

"Whatever Trump might have expected, he will face results beyond his expectation.

"I will surely and definitely tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire."

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/09/21/552756716/kim-jong-un-issues-statement-on-trump-a-frightened-dog-barks-louder

Dotard ??
I never heard before the word.
Kim Jong Un got so good in English ??

 

[gravity_infinity]

yeah right. buikim is No different from what he describe about trump. lol two loud mouth exchanging insults.

 

[LetsGoBoys!]

2 bui kias shouting at each other all day long

 

[gravity_infinity]

Kim Jong Un of North Korea, who is obviously a madman who doesn't mind starving or killing his people, will be tested like never before!
2 hours ago · Twitter

(Donald Trump)

 

[hardwriter]

Ww3 come already? Coming 23rd september liao wor

Sent from SGneeds10MillionPax using GAGT

 

[frenchbriefs]

Kim Bui Bui english is power

 

[Michael_Scofield]

bui kim is techies la

 

[trumperater]

This bui kim needs to be put in his place, only talk big nia.

Sent from meow meow jin cute using GAGT

 

[junnosuke]

i saw fussbudget

 

[gravity_infinity]

Pyongyang's foreign minister has said the North is considering a nuclear test around the Pacific, after a personal statement from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un to US President Donald Trump. Analyst Ankit Panda decodes this unprecedented statement - and what the Pacific threat could actually mean.
The threat follows another remarkable statement by the North, a first-person address from Mr Kim to Mr Trump.
Kim Jong-un's statement - the first of its kind - came shortly after the North Korean delegation led by Foreign Minister Ri Yong-ho arrived in New York for the annual United Nations General Assembly debate.
As such it merits a close reading and serious consideration.
Why did it come now?
The statement was manifestly a response to the US leader's braggadocio on Tuesday at the General Assembly, when he threatened to "totally destroy" North Korea if the United States was forced to defend itself or its allies.

It also marks what is perhaps the apotheosis of a slowly simmering war of words between the Trump administration and the North Korean regime.
In August, we watched as Kim Jong-un posed with a map threatening an enveloping ballistic missile strike on the US territory of Guam and Mr Trump promised "fire and fury" - possible nuclear first-use, in other words - to North Korea in exchange for continued threats.
Military parade in PyongyangImage copyrightAFP
Image caption
Pyongyang relentlessly pursues its nuclear ambitions
While North Korea's state media serve as a propaganda tool, more often than not the reclusive state's regime tells us exactly what it wants and exactly what it is planning to do in these statements.
Could it be about Donald Trump, personally?
First, even readers unaccustomed to North Korea's public messaging will note the wide range of ad hominem insults levied at Mr Trump in the statement.
Mr Kim lambasts the US leader - who'd dubbed him "Rocket Man" - as "mentally deranged," a "dotard" and a "frightened dog".
Second, notably, Kim Jong-un makes no reference to the US "hostile policy" in his statement.
The "hostile policy" is North Korea's paramount grievance about the US's East Asian alliances, permanently deployed military presence in South Korea and Japan, and provision of nuclear umbrella coverage to Seoul and Tokyo.
That Mr Kim chose to ignore it in a speech bemoaning the US president's threat to "destroy" his country appears notable in combination with his personalised critique of Mr Trump.
North Korean leader Kim Jong-un and US President Donald TrumpImage copyrightGETTY IMAGES
Image caption
How much of the tension is personal rivalry?
The implication here is that Mr Kim may regard Mr Trump as a sui generis phenomenon - his threats count as an affront to North Korea's dignity, but do not carry the weight of US policy.
Just as Donald Trump implied Kim Jong-un was irrational on Tuesday by noting that he was on a "suicide mission", so does Mr Kim imply that Mr Trump, instead of making a mundane speech at the General Assembly, chose to deliver "unprecedented rude nonsense one has never heard from any of his predecessors".
Finally, it's noteworthy that despite the overall bellicosity of the statement, Kim Jong-un does not opt to threaten the American people or the country itself. If there's a bottom line here it's that now it's personal.
The North Korea crisis in 300 words
Does the latest nuclear test mean war?
A pretext for a major provocation?
Doubling down, Mr Kim noted that Mr Trump's open expression of the "will to 'totally destroy' a sovereign state… makes even those with normal thinking faculty think about discretion and composure".
The implication here is clear - Kim Jong-un does not see Mr Trump as a man in possession of "normal thinking [faculties]".
What then does Mr Kim propose to do with a leader that he clearly regards as unstable and irrational? Clearly angered by the threat to "destroy" his country, Mr Kim promises to "tame the mentally deranged US dotard with fire".
This is not hard to interpret - Mr Kim is using this statement to provide a pretext for a spectacular provocation involving his ever more impressive ballistic missiles and his increasingly more powerful nuclear weapons.
These provocations could come in many forms. Kim Jong-un has already got his foot in the door in terms of overflying Japan with ballistic missile systems - he has done so twice in the past month.
Kim Jong-un watches a missile launch from North Korea, 16 SeptemberImage copyrightREUTERS
Image caption
Kim Jong-un watched a recent missile test in person
He could endeavour to do so with North Korea's Hwasong-14 intercontinental-range ballistic missile.
Separately, he could test-fire a longer-range submarine-launched ballistic missile or salvo-launch intermediate-range ballistic missiles in the direction of the US territory of Guam.
What missiles does North Korea have?
Are Pyongyang's missiles a risk to planes?
What are North Korea's other WMDs?
Finally, North Korea hasn't carried out deliberate conventional attacks against the US or its allies since 2010, when it shelled a South Korean island and sunk a South Korean naval ship, killing more than 40 sailors. It could attempt to seize the initiative with new provocations of this kind.
The provocations do not stop there, however. Immediately after the release of Mr Kim's statement, North Korea's foreign minister told reporters that the "highest-level" action Kim Jong-un is considering is possibly the "strongest hydrogen bomb test in the Pacific".
What could the Pacific threat really mean?
This raises a terrifying spectre - one that North Korea watchers have mulled for some time, but which did not seem realistic until this year.
Kim Jong-un could conduct an atmospheric nuclear detonation in the Pacific Ocean.
There are two mechanisms for a test like this. One is for Kim Jong-un to mount the nuclear device he showed the world before his 3 September nuclear test and fire it over Japan, into the Pacific Ocean, and demonstrate a credible thermonuclear capability.
What is an H-bomb?
The most powerful nuclear blasts in history
A US Air Force B-1B Lancer bomber sits on the runway at Andersen Air Force Base, Guam July 18, 2017Image copyrightREUTERS
Image caption
The Pacific island of Guam is home to the US Air Force's Andersen air base
Presumably, witnessing this feat would "tame" Trump into accepting the "equilibrium" that North Korea alluded to earlier this week - a state of stable nuclear deterrence.
Given the inadequacy of existing US and Japanese ballistic missile defence systems, it is far from a sure thing that such a test could be intercepted.
Jeffrey Lewis, an arms control expert at the Middlebury Center of International Studies at Monterey, alluded to China's fourth nuclear test as a reminder of why this logic may make sense to North Korea.
In the 1960s, US observers doubted Chinese nuclear capabilities until China placed a nuclear weapon on a ballistic missile and carried out an atmospheric detonation. Only then were they "tamed" to accept China as a serious nuclear state.
The last atmospheric nuclear test on Earth took place on 16 October 1980, by China.
What could the consequences be?
Nevertheless, the risks with a test like this are immense. Civil aviators and mariners in the target area may perish, given that North Korea does not offer international warning of its missile launch plans unlike other states that routinely test ballistic missiles.
Moreover, the environmental damage and fallout could be catastrophic. Should the missile fail over Japan - or prematurely detonate - the consequences would effectively guarantee a nuclear war in retaliation.


Media captionHow would war with North Korea unfold?
North Korea could choose not to use a missile for a test like this to mitigate some risk, but still demonstrate an awe-inspiring capability.
A second mechanism could be to sail a ship out to sea with a nuclear device and detonate it. Here, the odds that US intelligence would detect and interdict the North Korean vessel are higher.
What's critical to recall here is that North Korea gives no assurances of any specific action. Mr Kim simply insults Mr Trump, defends the dignity of his country and promises to consider further action.
Similarly, the foreign minister's words hint at one possible outcome of many.
An atmospheric nuclear test from North Korea would represent the climax of its provocative testing behaviour. It could even spark a military conflict should Washington, Seoul, and Tokyo determine that no more could be tolerated.
Does the North recognise red lines?
Fortunately, North Korea has proven to be deliberate and incremental in its ballistic missile and nuclear testing and recognises the existence of "red lines" for the international community.
For instance, after its nuclear tests, it noted that no environmental damage occurred, a token gesture of "responsibility" despite its illegal and provocative behaviour.
Ultimately, Kim Jong-un likely saw this statement as an act of proportionality.
Donald Trump's "unprecedented" threat to his country at the United Nations merited a proportionate response - an unprecedented first-person statement from him.
And so the war of words continues between the leader of the world's foremost nuclear superpower and its newest nuclear state.
Ankit Panda is a North Korea expert and senior editor at The Diplomat.

 

[demongod]

Wah his england jin good

Sent from This is Sparta using GAGT

 

[junnosuke]

Wah his england jin good

Sent from This is Sparta using GAGT

priest dunch undersextimate bui kim

 

[Chopin]

23rd sept will be the day NK released their most power nuclear, end of world is coming

 

[singapurablue]

Latest!....An expectant hush fell on the crowd as the giant screen outside Pyongyang's main train station went black on Friday afternoon.

Workers, students in gray uniforms, traveling families surrounded by piles of bags, women shielding themselves from the late summer sun with frilly parasols, for several minutes they all gazed at the rectangle with anticipation.

White text appeared on a red background: "The faith of the revolutionary is unchangeable even in death."

Despite being one of the world's youngest heads of state and less than half Trump's age, with six years in office Kim has significantly longer experience in politics.

The North Korean leader was "almost talking down to him and saying you are not supposed to speak that way at the U.N.", said Delury.

To the audience in Pyongyang, it was inspirational.

"We no longer need any words," said construction worker Kim Kwang-Hyok after watching the bulletin, clenching his fist. "I think that a crazy dog should be dealt with using a club and fire."

Ryu Ri Hwa, 74, said she had been through the Korean War and was feeling "indescribable anger."
"Now we have nuclear weapons so I am feeling very confident. We can win the war a hundred, a thousand times as long as we have our leader!" she cried, as onlookers applauded.

"Trump is a lunatic, lunatic! A lunatic who knows nothing!"

http://us.pressfrom.com/news/world/-85554-kims-words-find-rapt-audience-in-pyongyang/

 

[God Of Pcc]

ww3 cumming!!!

 

[fatbastardx]

Dotard ??
I never heard before the word.
Kim Jong Un got so good in English ??

He was schooled at the best Swiss private institutions since he was a kid