if you are only child this game is fine. if your siblings want to grab a share after the old man kaput then gg
uncle henry not the only child but his strategy worked.
his uncle can play it himself if he has the money

if you are only child this game is fine. if your siblings want to grab a share after the old man kaput then gg

stil trying to understand, why is old RSS better?

But isnt CPF Life monthly payout much higher than under RSS?
Say a 75yr old guy at BRS level of savings, shd opt in to CPF Life?
i believe there’s give and take. if give higher payout fr 20 years, after that a minority will spend everything and hv no money left fr their next few yrs before they pass on. with cpf life u won’t be full but at least u won’t go hungry till pass on
Yeah some want the payouts to last till 5 years and some want to withdraw everything now.
So how to cater to so many wants?
Yeah some want the payouts to last till 5 years and some want to withdraw everything now.
So how to cater to so many wants?
To me, old RSS is definitely much better than CPF Life!
But as the saying goes, good thing don't last!![]()
You don't need to pay annuity insurance premiums and subsidize other people (unless you are very confidence you can live past 95 years old!)![]()
Yes, there is no one plan for all.
Take this as a supplement.
When you are young, you want everything now. When you get older, you think of how to get stable income.
LOL....if really just take CPF as supplement.....they have to change their Mission statement...
"To enable Singaporeans to have a secure retirement, through lifelong income, healthcare financing and home financing."
i used the cpf life calculator on cpf website.
for the fixed amount in RA. start this year @70 yrs old
old RSS -1012 (from cpf letter) xirr - : 4.96%
cpf life std plan - 1085 (cpf life online calculator) xirr : 5.69%
stil trying to understand, why is old RSS better?


If I have a choice, my personal preference is the old RSS too.![]()
5.69%? Doesn't seem possible. What death age are you looking at for this?
not sure if i follow this train of thought.
again is it becoz of the pooled resources?
both start and end is the same for both old RSS and cpf life
26 years payout from age 70 (as per cpf letter)
with same RA balance
or, did i get my calculations wrong?
I dislike most about CPFLife is the complete "flexibility" that they have to adjust the payout as and when they see fit.
Also personally I don't need the longevity insurance and I would not like to pay for something that I don't need.
What I like the most, is the 4% interest rate and the higher limit (ERS) that can enjoy this 4%.
The old RSS fits my needs better.
Ah, but you would pay if CPF LIFE didn't exist. There'd be more elderly Singaporeans living in deeper poverty, and you would be involved in supporting them through government transfer payments, funded from general tax revenues -- your higher taxes.Also personally I don't need the longevity insurance and I would not like to pay for something that I don't need.
Ah, but you would pay if CPF LIFE didn't exist. There'd be more elderly Singaporeans living in deeper poverty, and you would be involved in supporting them through government transfer payments, funded from general tax revenues -- your higher taxes.
I don't have much sympathy for the argument that a BRS-level CPF LIFE annuity would "crimp your style." What would actually crimp your style-- and result in a lot more Singaporean misery -- is lots more elderly Singaporeans in deeper poverty. Universal or near-universal longevity insurance helps prevent that, and that's all to the good.
Don't just build a random strawman and then proceed to destroy it with gusto.both start and end is the same for both old RSS and cpf life
26 years payout from age 70 (as per cpf letter)
with same RA balance
or, did i get my calculations wrong?