theMKR
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2016
- Messages
- 70,993
- Reaction score
- 13,608
Well, the house has been devalued gao gao as well. Who will want to buy in future?
Still higher than average inheritance.....
Well, the house has been devalued gao gao as well. Who will want to buy in future?
1. See he can continue to happy how long; and
2. After he passed on (since nobody is an immortal), whether his beneficiaries will berate him for making this decision not to sell, .. and now they inherited this property, instead of cash (or other investments should he sell and re-invest the proceeds).
anyway when the project built finish, the 2 house got no more sun already...
How can URA even allowed such a sale...in other country, the landscape has to be consistent or neighbours are agreeable to the change of landed to condo...
Personally I feel the developer lowballed the other 5 owners who sold.
https://www.99.co/blog/singapore/owners-of-geylang-terraces-refuse-to-sell-to-condo-developer-becomes-up-in-real-life/
1. See he can continue to happy how long; and
2. After he passed on (since nobody is an immortal), whether his beneficiaries will berate him for making this decision not to sell, .. and now they inherited this property, instead of cash (or other investments should he sell and re-invest the proceeds).
Nv change what.
It is liddat. U want landed, u buy in landed zone....
if i remember correctly, there is a service road between the houses fronting guilemard road and facing lorong 28.
So that service road is public property or state land??
if so, then govt totally sabo the 2 houses.
2) then the service road is 99years, but noma is sold as freehold. so after 99years how?
*some service road are freehold private property, so hard to say....
edited: ok, seems like the service road is privately owned.
Hv lah. Now all around is 4 storeys high and only his get stucked in the middle.
The landscape is really very horrible. Go there and see.
If it is landed zone, it should remain as landed zone.
this kind of old folks vvv stubborn one.
they dont need the money actually just wait to die, so no point they sell
I think you all got it wrong.
The house with owner living in it is on the side which is still okay and there are still uses for it in future. The 1 stuck in the middle is a temple and the owner is not living in it which I think is devalued.
Do you guys know who own which house or not. Zzz.
Don't think developer lowballed the owners, cos if you check URA sales record, 2 years ago developer bought the 5 units at $20+M, meaning each owner got around $4m? I think it's quite a good deal, and the sole owner left behind had made a bad decision. He should have just sold it, took the money and buy another landed around the same Geylang area at lower price and kept the surplus.
Now that the developer has already started constructing, his house is of little value now. Developer won't need his land anymore, and I doubt any buyer will be interested in buying a house stuck in between 2 tall walls.
Anyway, it's his life, his choice, lor.
I think you all got it wrong.
The house with owner living in it is on the side which is still okay and there are still uses for it in future. The 1 stuck in the middle is a temple and the owner is not living in it which I think is devalued.
Do you guys know who own which house or not. Zzz.



Nice, so temple can develop higher?
Funny that a temple is in the middle of fh landed.
all along it was zoned residential, not zoned landed.... since the oldest masterplan published by ura....