Singapore Treasury bills (T-bills)

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,070
Reaction score
5,791
1-yr TBill
Issue date: 31 Jan 2023
Maturity date: 30 Jan 2024

So 31 Jan funds credited to cpfis
Manually transfer via IB/ATM to CPF OA on 31 Jan
1 Feb funds credited to CPF OA

Transacted date will be 31 Jan or 1 Feb? Thanks!
You will likely lose 14 months instead of 13 months of interest
 

dreamwork7878

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2011
Messages
24,490
Reaction score
182
tbill.png


Bid higher to help the poor
Higher yield to finance your medical bills.

> 5%
 

henrylbh

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2004
Messages
16,160
Reaction score
864
1-yr TBill
Issue date: 31 Jan 2023
Maturity date: 30 Jan 2024

So 31 Jan funds credited to cpfis
Manually transfer via IB/ATM to CPF OA on 31 Jan
1 Feb funds credited to CPF OA

Transacted date will be 31 Jan or 1 Feb? Thanks!
Very likely Feb's interest down the drain. Best is to avoid such risk as movements of fund involve MAS, CPFIA, yourself and CPF.
 

reddevil0728

Great Supremacy Member
Joined
Dec 16, 2005
Messages
66,070
Reaction score
5,791
never calculate before :o
2.5% X (number of months interest loss) / (number of months of t-bill)
Very likely Feb's interest down the drain. Best is to avoid such risk as movements of fund involve MAS, CPFIA, yourself and CPF.
Technically just have to add a premium you are willing to accept to the higher breakeven
 

xy2010xy

Junior Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2020
Messages
30
Reaction score
1
My experience is that CPF OA money will be deducted one day after auction date which is before issue date, so Jan 2023 interest will be forfeited since interest is not earned in the month of withdrawal.

Maturity date for DBS usually will be credited back to CPFIA within 1 business day after maturity date. If you transfer back to CPF OA before/on 31 Jan, will start earning CPF interest again in Feb 2024. If you forget to transfer back, will stay in CPFIA not earning interest for 2 months of inactivity before it gets transferred back to OA.
for Tbill purchased by cash, it will return back to bank account automatically after maturity? cash returning to bank account is on maturity date or next day? Thanks a lot.
 

vsvs24

Arch-Supremacy Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2018
Messages
11,332
Reaction score
3,691
for Tbill purchased by cash, it will return back to bank account automatically after maturity? cash returning to bank account is on maturity date or next day? Thanks a lot.
Same day after 5pm (DBS) to the bank account linked to your CDP
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
Based on the logic of those calling out low ballers
take the case of total tbill amount = 5000
A bid 0% 1k
B bid 1% 1k
C bid 2% 1k
D bid 3% 1k
E bid 4% 1k
f bid 5% 1k
G bid 6% 1k
COY = 4%

1. D scold A : you stupid lowballer. if you bid higher we could get a higher COY.
True? If A bid 4%, COY is still 4%

2. is A a lowball guy? yes he is. if he did not bid, the COY would have risen to 5%. his bid helped to bring the COY to 4%

3. is E a lowball guy, yes he is, if he did not bid, the COY would have risen to 5%. his bid helped to bring the COY down to 4%.

Is it wrong to say that everyone that is allocated are lowballers based on the above example?
 

BernardWYF

Banned
Joined
Jun 2, 2021
Messages
8,813
Reaction score
2,774
take the case of total tbill amount = 5000
A bid 0% 1k
B bid 1% 1k
C bid 2% 1k
D bid 3% 1k
E bid 4% 1k
f bid 5% 1k
G bid 6% 1k
COY = 4%

1. D scold A : you stupid lowballer. if you bid higher we could get a higher COY.
True? If A bid 4%, COY is still 4%

2. is A a lowball guy? yes he is. if he did not bid, the COY would have risen to 5%. his bid helped to bring the COY to 4%

3. is E a lowball guy, yes he is, if he did not bid, the COY would have risen to 5%. his bid helped to bring the COY down to 4%.

Is it wrong to say that everyone that is allocated are lowballers based on the above example?

if the COY is 4%, bidders A, B, C, D will benefit from their tactic since if they get full allocation, they are actually collecting 4% and not their 0-3% ... that's why low-balling bidders will benefit ... right?
 

milkfish

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2022
Messages
208
Reaction score
138
Yeah. Scolding low ballers is basically saying "I should get, you should not get". So I think it's kinda dumb.

Unless you can collude with significant portion of bidders, low ball or high ball makes no difference. It boils down to who get vs who don't get. Don't blame people who bid smarter than you can?
 

surefire888

Master Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2008
Messages
2,564
Reaction score
238
take the case of total tbill amount = 5000
A bid 0% 1k
B bid 1% 1k
C bid 2% 1k
D bid 3% 1k
E bid 4% 1k
f bid 5% 1k
G bid 6% 1k
COY = 4%

1. D scold A : you stupid lowballer. if you bid higher we could get a higher COY.
True? If A bid 4%, COY is still 4%

2. is A a lowball guy? yes he is. if he did not bid, the COY would have risen to 5%. his bid helped to bring the COY to 4%

3. is E a lowball guy, yes he is, if he did not bid, the COY would have risen to 5%. his bid helped to bring the COY down to 4%.

Is it wrong to say that everyone that is allocated are lowballers based on the above example?
"Lowballer" is not a complimentary term so i wouldn't suggest calling everyone who is successful a lowballer. It is true that everyone successful has a part in fixing the COY but this does not make him a lowballer. More important is the intention and frame of mind of the bidder. If say, by freak chance the COY is 10%, it would not be correct to call someone who bid 9.9% a lowballer. And what if the issue was not fully subscribed and there were no bids above 10%?

Rather, i would say the real lowballers are those who bid at a level that they themselves would not be happy to accept. For eg, a person using cash may be happy only if he gets 4% but he still bids 0.5%. Or a person using CPF may be happy only if he gets 2.9% but he bids 0.1%

If everyone bids at the minimum level that they honestly are happy to be successful at taking into account alternative investment options and personal preferences, you wont have any complaints when COY suddenly drops to say 2%. Right now, these real lowballers are exposing themselves to exactly this risk
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
"Lowballer" is not a complimentary term so i wouldn't suggest calling everyone who is successful a lowballer. It is true that everyone successful has a part in fixing the COY but this does not make him a lowballer. More important is the intention and frame of mind of the bidder. If say, by freak chance the COY is 10%, it would not be correct to call someone who bid 9.9% a lowballer. And what if the issue was not fully subscribed and there were no bids above 10%?
glad you understand that everyone that is allocated has done their part in preventing the coy on going higher.

on your freak example of coy at 10%. the effect of a guy 9.9% is the same as the effect of a guy that bid 1% on the coy. so if a 9.9% guy is not lowballing, then the 1% guy is not lowballing. so stop calling the guy that bid 1% a low ball guy
 

dork32

Supremacy Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
9,366
Reaction score
1,578
Rather, i would say the real lowballers are those who bid at a level that they themselves would not be happy to accept. For eg, a person using cash may be happy only if he gets 4% but he still bids 0.5%. Or a person using CPF may be happy only if he gets 2.9% but he bids 0.1%
this is not just lowball, this is stupid. this guy that you are talking about is just a stupid lowballer.

if he bid 4%, he is just a lowballer, not stupid
 
Important Forum Advisory Note
This forum is moderated by volunteer moderators who will react only to members' feedback on posts. Moderators are not employees or representatives of HWZ Forums. Forum members and moderators are responsible for their own posts. Please refer to our Community Guidelines and Standards and Terms and Conditions for more information.
Top