gregory_choo
Arch-Supremacy Member
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2007
- Messages
- 10,553
- Reaction score
- 2,009
even at this rate, the demand is still high.

reits still giving more than 5%
probably more once rate cuts improve their margins and distributions
There will almost always be over-subscription, so nothing surprising even if the rate is very loweven at this rate, the demand is still high.
yes but they are different instrument
equity comes with risk
tbill no risk
not everyone has the appetite for risk
Eh not a like for like comparison. Want to compare risk also need to compare like for like ma.this is a standard answer and many will agree with u due to a shallow understanding of risks
there is something called reinvestment risk which exists for tbill every 6 mth
eventually what will happen once yield starved investors have no where to go when tbill/deposit/fixed D rates drop towards 1-2% ?
they end up w the real risks of loading up on equities when prices are high, reit ETF CLR CFA > $1
then when prices drop they kpkb and then start telling everyone, their family and children that stocks are very risky and the vicious cycle continues
must have over subscription, else everyone will get 60% yield if one crazy guy bid at 60%.There will almost always be over-subscription, so nothing surprising even if the rate is very low
this is a standard answer and many will agree with u due to a shallow understanding of risks
there is something called reinvestment risk which exists for tbill every 6 mth
eventually what will happen once yield starved investors have no where to go when tbill/deposit/fixed D rates drop towards 1-2% ?
they end up w the real risks of loading up on equities when prices are high, reit ETF CLR CFA > $1
then when prices drop they kpkb and then start telling everyone, their family and children that stocks are very risky and the vicious cycle continues
lol. I know your theory. I'm vested in equities but look, not everyone are into equities investment. investment required knowledge and not everyone is keen. who dunno will lose to inflation? theologically equities certainly better as yield higher. but again it boils down to different ppl different risk right? can't expect all the same as you
ppl kpkb is human nature. they just want to rant it out lo. let them be. no need to be so huan lo. their money their call right?
https://www.mas.gov.sg/bonds-and-bi...ill?issue_code=BS21101T&issue_date=2021-01-26must have over subscription, else everyone will get 60% yield if one crazy guy bid at 60%.
same for coe, can get $1 if underscribed.
I am talking about bid to cover ratio, it is surprisingly high, given the 'low' yield.
People can think logically yet they just don’t have the guts to do itAgreed, think its the knowledge or at least to bother learning about it
anyway I also benefitted from tbills and enjoyed it while it lasted
to clock the 'income' category to hit the max amount for 4.1%Why need to do that
Are you aware of the alternate way?to clock the 'income' category to hit the max amount for 4.1%
the buy-and-sell UT way that you shared about?Are you aware of the alternate way?
Nope. Essentially cost neutral.the buy-and-sell UT way that you shared about?
just not my preference to pay those broker commissions.. especially if it's in the 30k range each month.
Madam Goh and Mr Liew always lodge non-competitive bids.
Madam Goh said she is content to earn some extra interest above the savings account rate of 0.05 per cent.
Mr Liew is not worried that the yield he gets is too low, as he believes the opportunity cost of missing out on a T-bill issue is greater.
anyone that can count to 100 and know the 26 alphabet can be a portfolio managerFor housewife Madam Goh not to know about competitive bids is one thing, but "portfolio manager Daryl Liew" should do better than that!![]()
have you tried reading or searching about the breakeven? it's been talked about many times... can't recall the exact values.When BY23103V 1-Year T-bill matures on 22 Oct what is the minimum percentage I can roll into for breakeven? Assume using CPF-OA?